Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have been thinking about this plenum/runner flow business a fair bit myself lately.

Testing the static flow of each runner on a flow-bench individually means nothing really, because you are flowing only one runner at a time, although getting them all the same is probably a good start.

What you need to do is flow all the runners together at the same time, so that for example, cylinder number one sees five cylinders worth of air passing right across in front of it.

The runner and plenum flows should be something like what happens in the car. To make it even more real, you might have to drive the inlet cam with an electric motor, so the runners pulse in turn.

I have not done it yet, but how about blowing air into the plenum under pressure, turning the inlet cam with a motor, then measuring the flow out from each combustion chamber with six identical orifice plates ?

The turbulent air into the plenum would approximate pretty much what comes out of the intercooler I would think. You could drive the inlet cam at any speed you really want as well. The only thing missing is piston action and exhaust reversion, but I think this would be as close to measuring reality as you could get.

Probably an ideal tool for plenum design testing.

I will definitely try this when my new larger flow-bench is completed, I should finally have enough airflow to do it.

A good starting point is Computational Fluid Dynamics Software. If someone can find pirated software (licence is worth tens of thousands) i can use it.

You see all the big car makers with their 3D modelling, its a very good place to start, and if you have access to the software you can setup accurate models. You still need to validate the model with calculations but you woud be surprised how easy the software is to use.

Anyone want something modelled in 3D then PM me:D

Sadly dont have access to Finite Element Analysis Softare (Forces and stresses) or Computational Fluids Software (looking at flows) but can still model stuff.

Sorry about being off topic!

...and same model different angle

Ill shut up now and let RB25 owners tell you what pistons to use.

As for compression ratios im looking at using up to 9:1 on the RB20 im building.

Im hoping to get good low rpm response, and get the turbo on song as quick as possible. (Still have to check with engine builder that im not building a hand grenade)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If you are keeping the current calipers you need to keep the current disc as the spacing of the caliper determines the disc diameter. Have you trial fitted the GTS brakes fit on a GTSt hub or is this forward planning? There could be differences in caliper mount spacing, backing plate and even hub shape that could cause an issue.
    • Hi there I have a r33 gts with 4 stud small brakes, I'm going to convert to 5 stud but keep the small brakes, what size rotor would I need?
    • First up, I wouldn't use PID straight up for boost control. There's also other control techniques that can be implemented. And as I said, and you keep missing the point. It's not the ONE thing, it's the wrapping it up together with everything else in the one system that starts to unravel the problem. It's why there are people who can work in a certain field as a generalist, IE a IT person, and then there are specialists. IE, an SQL database specialist. Sure the IT person can build and run a database, and it'll work, however theyll likely never be as good as a specialist.   So, as said, it's not as simple as you're thinking. And yes, there's a limit to the number of everything's in MCUs, and they run out far to freaking fast when you're designing a complex system, which means you have to make compromises. Add to that, you'll have a limited team working on it, so fixing / tweaking some features means some features are a higher priority than others. Add to that, someone might fix a problem around a certain unrelated feature, and that change due to other complexities in the system design, can now cause a new, unforseen bug in something else.   The whole thing is, as said, sometimes split systems can work as good, and if not better. Plus when there's no need to spend $4k on an all in one solution, to meet the needs of a $200 system, maybe don't just spout off things others have said / you've read. There's a lot of misinformation on the internet, including in translated service manuals, and data sheets. Going and doing, so that you know, is better than stating something you read. Stating something that has been read, is about as useful as an engineering graduate, as all they know is what they've read. And trust me, nearly every engineering graduate is useless in the real world. And add to that, if you don't know this stuff, and just have an opinion, maybe accept what people with experience are telling you as information, and don't keep reciting the exact same thing over and over in response.
    • How complicated is PID boost control? To me it really doesn't seem that difficult. I'm not disputing the core assertion (specialization can be better than general purpose solutions), I'm just saying we're 30+ years removed from the days when transistor budgets were in the thousands and we had to hem and haw about whether there's enough ECC DRAM or enough clock cycles or the interrupt handler can respond fast enough to handle another task. I really struggle to see how a Greddy Profec or an HKS EVC7 or whatever else is somehow a far superior solution to what you get in a Haltech Nexus/Elite ECU. I don't see OEMs spending time on dedicated boost control modules in any car I've ever touched. Is there value to separating out a motor controller or engine controller vs an infotainment module? Of course, those are two completely different tasks with highly divergent requirements. The reason why I cite data sheets, service manuals, etc is because as you have clearly suggested I don't know what I'm doing, can't learn how to do anything correctly, and have never actually done anything myself. So when I do offer advice to people I like to use sources that are not just based off of taking my word for it and can be independently verified by others so it's not just my misinterpretation of a primary source.
    • That's awesome, well done! Love all these older Datsun / Nissans so rare now
×
×
  • Create New...