Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

to be quiet honest if i end up selling this car, i might go for a 32 4 door shell n put in a rb25 again, the amount of tourque u get compared to the 20 is heaps good,

Out of interest can you post a dyno graph?

No doubt you get more low to mid range with the RB25. But i have noticed that an RB20 will often make the same power from about 4,000-4,200rpm onwards, about 110km/h. So sure you have more low end grunt which is nice for tootling around on the street. BUT, how often do you actually drive through the 2,500-4,000rpm range when you are up and trying to go quickly?

So, based on that alone i have stuck with the RB20. Its as quick as the RB25 etc R32 GTSts getting around when you are up it and having a go....and on the street its still nice and tractable...its just not punchy. I dont care if a bloke comes out of a 20km/h roundabout and pulls away from me. Im going for milk not a lap time. LOL its at the track where you can use the power that it matters to me :(

So no one solution suits everybody, and that includes their budgets :P

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Not saying one is better then the other. Im just posting up to highlight that the gap isnt as huge as ppl make out, and dont forget the TD06 is a bigger, plain bearing turbo and the RB25 above is running more compression with a smaller ball bearign turbo.

RB20s can give results that may satisfy what you want to do with your R32 without resorting to an engine conversion.

I had a R32 with a 25 Conversion about 5 years ago - while it was a great conversion , looking back on it I wudve rather worked a RB20!!!

I have owned my Cefiro now with the RB20DET in it for around 17 months and I cant stress how happy I am with this car. It is probably the least powerful import I have ever owned (despite making close to 200 rwkw) and it has given me trouble free motoring since I owned it - and those who know me know I dont drive my cars like a Pansy.

The RB20 is a very under rated engine. I will admit that in the past I have jumped on the bandwagon and said they have no low down torque and all the usual garbage you hear from people about these motors.

Its all a load of crap. My 20 has a small GT2510 turbo on it and its on full boost (1.1 bar) at around 3000 rpm with a stupidly urgent push all the way to 8400 rpm. It feels absolutely great and is thoroughly enjoyable to drive. My old JZX100 chaser with the torque monster VVTi 1JZ didnt feel as urgent down low!!!

Your best bet is to put a cheap RB20 replacement motor and enjoy the car without going thru all the headaches associated with engine conversions.

And why would you wanna make your Skyline sound like a Truck. Say NO to SR20 conversions :)

Edited by Starionturbo

wow i just realised a) this thread is hell old and b) i already posted a while back..

Dont get me wrong i love my 25, but i could have saved alot of money and just bolted a 2530 onto the 20 and ripped it up without a care in the world

i agree with alot of things said here, if ur on a budget stick with rb23 + hks 2530

but rb25s can handle 300 at the wheel and box safely from what every1 on here is saying.

how much can rb20s hold?

im thinking about getting some aggressive cams at the same time as the power fc (if i can friggen find one for under 13000 =)

i guess it all depends on ur driving style and needs, if u want ~200 at the wheel and use it alot of drift, just keep bouncing off that limiter and keep kicking the clutch and u will never need down low torque lol... plus rb20s go for like $700? while rb25s go for much much more.

like i said, i was looking to sell my car n get a 4door, but i changed my mind n sticking to the 25 =)

oh and btw roy which one is ur dyno sheet? both are very impressive i must say

The two sheets under yours are mine. Interloper and I put out cars on Dr Drifts dyno (the mainline chart) where mine is the blue line showing it to be a llittle more responsive and make more power then the GT-RS. Though i was running more boost so kind of expected. A few months after that dyno run i was chasing more power so tried some cams, then removed them and just spent a bit more time on the tuning and perhaps cam gear timing. The result is the Dyno Dynamics graoh showing 260rwkws. (The other line on that graph was with teh 260/8.8mm cams :nyaanyaa: )

Both have thier merits!

I think a light tune rb20 would have to be better than a stock rb25 (cause thats the decision that faces many)

Regarding response i have a mate who makes 270rwkw on his rb20 R32 using a Garret 3071R and i had a rb25 in mine making 270rwkw using a 3076R and at any rpm my car was able to pull away not by tonnes but it was noticeable! Oh pus i could turn the boost up later and make 300rwkw but he couldnt and would start crying about cheating! So despite the fact i had a bigger turbo my response was still better.

Emz uve never experienced RB20 powaah!! Ive never seen ur RB25 even turn the wheels in 2nd gear!!

Tim (silver R32 that drifts) has a TD06 L2 setup on his 32 with PowerFC - tuned by Racepace it pushes 270 rwkw!! Thats outta a stock RB20DET and he thrashes the ring outta it on limiter.

Power figures mean nothing - its about how the car is tuned and set up and how effectively it gets it power to the ground.

Another guy I know Imported a R32 GTS-T very recently that was built by STILLWAY in Japan.

All I can say is - what a freaking Monster!!!!

Stillway built RB20 stroker - 2.4 Liter, unknown cams (very very lumpy), stillway ECU and a Trust T78!!

Cross mission 25 box and Quad Plate clutch. Just listening to it, id be hard pressed to find another RB motor that sounded better.

Ceffy is due for some cams and Trust turbine love sometime this year!!

Edited by Starionturbo
Both have thier merits!

I think a light tune rb20 would have to be better than a stock rb25 (cause thats the decision that faces many)

Regarding response i have a mate who makes 270rwkw on his rb20 R32 using a Garret 3071R and i had a rb25 in mine making 270rwkw using a 3076R and at any rpm my car was able to pull away not by tonnes but it was noticeable! Oh pus i could turn the boost up later and make 300rwkw but he couldnt and would start crying about cheating! So despite the fact i had a bigger turbo my response was still better.

Interesting as there are a few RB25s at the track making between 280-320rwkws and coming onto the straights they sure as hell dont pull away from me. If anything i pull a bit on them. I think the only car i know of woudl by Adz who has a neat RB25 in his R32. Looking at vods of his car against mine he does seem to pull a car length or two on the long front straight at Sandown. I know the R33s and R34s i am referring to dont seem to pull any gap on me. Actually just remembered Lee Wilson oin the AVO R33 which runs a GT35 and about 310rwkws...he pulled about 2 car lengths on me down an entire straight at Sandown.

But i imagine on the street it would be far more pronounced as the rpm woudl often be less then 3,000rpm and you would die in an RB20. But at the track where you are always above 4,000rpm, if not 4,5000rpm there is more variation in the suspension cars are running then the power, torque the engien is making.

Still, the day will come where my RB20 will die...finances at the time will be the only thing to dictate me decision. $600 and another motor for a few more years of fun...or 330rwkws and 15k and try to chase down some of the quicker cars?!?!?!

2.5k and a mechanic and your problems will go away. Wrecker motor with 3 month warranty, new belts, pumps etc and all labour performed by someone else. I would expect that you wouldnt be up for much more then $2500, providing you can get a motor for less then $800

if you can do it with friends then even better, just be sure that its done properly

As said above IMO this is the best option.

Otherwise do a budget RB30 build for another 1k or so.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...