Jump to content
SAU Community

The Nissan Skyline-9th Best Sportscar Of Alltime


wizlb
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 199
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

This thread has been a good laugh. So its a 360? Ooops. I was too busy amusing myself whilst i shoudl be doing other things.

Hats off to the crazy guys that take golf buggies and tweak them. Mega props for having the balls to mess with somehting so valuable to start with. From

escalade_white.jpg

to this...

f430_hamann_01.jpg

Now thats what those Itlain biys hsoudl have done in the first place :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread has been a good laugh. So its a 360? Ooops. I was too busy amusing myself whilst i shoudl be doing other things.

Hats off to the crazy guys that take golf buggies and tweak them. Mega props for having the balls to mess with somehting so valuable to start with. From

escalade_white.jpg

to this...

f430_hamann_01.jpg

Now thats what those Itlain biys hsoudl have done in the first place :)

man that Hamann 430 is sex.

go on roy... admit it you softcock, youd love to give it a poking, yeah? :(:P :laughing-smiley-014:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hold on a minute there, can you explain why is it the 911 GT3 not a super car?

1005big.jpg

-driven by Walter Röhrl himself.

Which is directly related to this

2060726.003.1L.jpg

"a capacity of 3.8-litres with two 30.3 millimetre air restrictors. With the mandatory air restrictors, the unit delivers 359kW/485bhp at 8,500rpm. Maximum torque increased to 435Nm. Top engine speed is reached at 9,000rpm."

Because the 911 GT3RS is not a 911 GT3RSR for starters. Related or not they do not have the same attributes period. Second to that, you would compare that to a Z-Tune, and the Z-Tune ain't no Super Car either. Porsche built the Carerra GT as it was one of the few high end car manufacturers that did not ever make a Super Car. That being, something new and entirely different from any other previous platform.... which rules out any 911.

Roy, your biased and taking the piss. Well done, the 32 goes hard but why this conversation is still trying to compare a horse to a nisan is kinda stupid.

Someone mentioned before that Japan asnt produced a true supercar..well, what exactly then is the Toyota GT-1?

And Nissan? The R390 Gt-1? Anyone who says that its not a bespoke chassis, blah blah blah is talking crapola.

Nissan and toyotas had to make road going versions of these cars as the rules implied this for lemans competition.

Those two cars would dust just about anything on the top 10 list...

So there are full-spec road legal versions of these going around? Anyway, this is a GT-1 class track car. It's another category again. If you want to go down that track then you would have to include the home grown V8 'Super Cars' with a mere 650 bhp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Drugs? LOL, nope sleep deprivation from working farked up hours

:D

Porsche built the Carerra GT as it was one of the few high end car manufacturers that did not ever make a Super Car.

Huh, say what???? Porsche had never made a supercar? What do you call this beast then?

white959porsche01.jpg

0-100km/h: 3.7 s.

0-160km/h: 8.3 s.

0-200km/h: 12.7 s.

400m: 11.8 s. @ 119 mph (standing)

0-1000 meters: 21.6 s. (standing)

Top Speed: 198+ mph

All in 1987 or thereabouts

go on roy... admit it you softcock, youd love to give it a poking, yeah? :(:P :laughing-smiley-014:

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Drugs? LOL, nope sleep deprivation from working farked up hours

:P

Huh, say what???? Porsche had never made a supercar? What do you call this beast then?

white959porsche01.jpg

0-100km/h: 3.7 s.

0-160km/h: 8.3 s.

0-200km/h: 12.7 s.

400m: 11.8 s. @ 119 mph (standing)

0-1000 meters: 21.6 s. (standing)

Top Speed: 198+ mph

All in 1987 or thereabouts

thats " stick this in your pipe and smoke it" material roy you shit stirrer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont mean a second of malice in anything i have posted...i hope this is a good light hearted thread which is now just good fun. Well thats how im viewing it :P its always interesting to read peoples views on what makes a car apperaling...so many different takes. I know i have changed my opinion over time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont mean a second of malice in anything i have posted...i hope this is a good light hearted thread which is now just good fun. Well thats how im viewing it :) its always interesting to read peoples views on what makes a car apperaling...so many different takes. I know i have changed my opinion over time

i was taking the piss mate. :(:P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Huh, say what???? Porsche had never made a supercar? What do you call this beast then?

white959porsche01.jpg

0-100km/h: 3.7 s.

0-160km/h: 8.3 s.

0-200km/h: 12.7 s.

400m: 11.8 s. @ 119 mph (standing)

0-1000 meters: 21.6 s. (standing)

Top Speed: 198+ mph

All in 1987 or thereabouts

:P

Well, a good looking one anyway. I forgot about that one.... probably because it's fugly! I do stand corrected though. Nice pick up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Porsche built the Carerra GT as it was one of the few high end car manufacturers that did not ever make a Super Car.

Ahem...

1994-porsche-962.JPG

Dauer_Porsche_962_LM.jpg

Porsche 956 (late 1980's) and Porsche 962 (early 1990's)... Group C homologation editions, sold to the public (well... privateers who could afford them, but still "public") and road registered. Definitely Supercars right there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what was the build volume on those? Wasnt it somehting like 8? Definitely exclusive, farking fast, horn looking . So SUPERCAR!

Who was first with the Supercar. Ford, Lambo? Surely the GT40 was close to being the first? Or GTO Fuzz???? Whats considered the first supercar?

ferrari_250_GTO_side.jpg

The%20Parade%20Blue%20Miura.jpg

LOL...see the F430 in the background :P

ford_gt40.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol this happen in perth, the driver was having a few beers at the pub then he got into the car, some people @ the pub were egging him on so he drop it from the lights and hit the lights!

more money than brains because he was in Ferrari that week ordering another one :P

yeh i remember when that happened lol, the thread following the investigation and mobile phone pics of the guy being questioned by police after he tried to do a runner haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW, I totally forgot about two very unique and important japanese built supercars, that are real supercars in the sense of exclusivity, rarity and construction/spec.

The Tommy Kaira ZZ and Tommy Kaira ZZ2

tommy_kaira_zz2.jpg

and also the Toyota 2000GT

1969_toyota_2000_gt.jpg

only 337 made... and more expensive even now than a Porsche 911 ever was :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because the 911 GT3RS is not a 911 GT3RSR for starters. Related or not they do not have the same attributes period. Second to that, you would compare that to a Z-Tune, and the Z-Tune ain't no Super Car either. Porsche built the Carerra GT as it was one of the few high end car manufacturers that did not ever make a Super Car. That being, something new and entirely different from any other previous platform.... which rules out any 911.

Everyone has his/her own definitions of a supercar which is all subjective. It however should not be defined solely based on for example; if it has an exclusive bespoke chassis; or whether or not it was a derivative of a common platform. Supercar is an X factor thing. The bedroom poster quote is actually not too far from the truth. I would say its something a bit out of the ordinary with a definite character.

Below is a supercar classification list I found interesting.

"For me it's a car that takes things to the extreme which can't be seen as sensible.

Modern Absolute Supercars (last 20 years):

Murcielago, Enzo, F40, F50, XJ220, XJR15, F1, EB110, Veyron, 959, Carrera GT, GT, MC12, Zonda.

Past Supercars:

Daytona, Miura, GT40, 288GTO, Countach,

The Everyday Supercars:

Gallardo, 599GTB, 360CS, 575M, 911 Turbo, 911 GT3RS, Z06, Cerbera, F430, Skyline GTR, NSX.

Gallardo: It probably would be if it's bigger brother wasn't around.

360CS: It was built to be a track toy, it was derived from a lesser model and the Enzo existed.

575M: It was never supposed to be Ferrari's flagship and, for me, the engine's in the wrong place

996T: Quick as you like but far too practical and far too reliable. Relatively cheap, too.

GT3RS: See also: 360CS

Z06: It's the everyday supercar but it's not a Supercar.

Cerbera: For me it lacks the bloodline (yes, I know I included the Zonda) and they're even cheaper than a 996T.

F430: See 360CS.

A supercar is something that is pushing the boundaries of the technology of the time, or at least getting very close to the boundaries."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I conjure thoughts of a what classifies as a 'Super Car', I personally think of; the epitome of design (external & mechanical) from that manufacturer for the time, exclusivity, raw power (500bhp+, depending on the era), limited run made, not an everyday car, is road legal, aerodynamic low profile, carries a big price tag & probably without a lot of luxuries to keep the weight down.

This debate has been an interesting insight into what everyone classifies a 'Super Car'. I still think it's mirky between what is a sports car, and what is a Super Car though.

Put it this way, if a Rex can be made to be as quick around a track than a GTR, would this also be thought of as a Super Car by some?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I picked up an open Center with shafts. I was told the Open shafts will fit a mechanical LSD and looking at them. I think they will work. Will update 
    • The manual says a lot about the different ratios requiring different shafts. all the Centers are the same but depending on the ratio, this determines the shafts because different ratios need the center to be offset more or less or right to left.
    • those 2 sets of shafts will not interchange and if you’re lucky you haven’t damaged anything with all your pressing and bashing you said you’ve done 
    • Freshly built stroked RB25/28. Motor runs great but consumes a lot more oil then It should. This summer with the heat I was consuming roughly a quart per 1800-2000kms. Now with the cold weather coming in, I'm consuming a quart per 1000kms which is no bueno. I had originally chalked this out to break in taking a little longer then it should, but I'm now around 4000km's on this engine. I think it's fair to say something isn't quite right. Here's the kicker, can't find what's causing it. I've also spoken to my engine builder and Precision Turbo and can't figure it out. Here's my train of thought on possible causes and what I've done.  Precision Turbo - I originally started thinking my oil pressure might be a tad too high for my 6466 Gen2. I took the center cartridge out, and while yes there's signs of oil on the turbine heatshield, it's very moderate. There's also very minor in/out play that concerns me. I sent pictures and videos to precision and they said the residue and in/out play is minimal and they doubt this is the issue. For piece of mind, I went ahead and installed a Turbosmart OPR V2 to bring oil pressure down. Made no difference. Precision is willing to take it in on RMA for an inspection and I'll probably take them up on that offer for peace of mind. BTW. Is it just me or does the turbines inducer's look clipped and not even between each other? I just noticed this now while posting and looking at the picture zoomed in. Might just be the picture...  Rings - Hot compression test and leak down test look good. Compression is 160 +-2psi across the board. I leak down at 16% on cyl 1,2,3,5,6 and 18% on cyl4. Keep in mind I have a snap on leak down tester and they read high (I.E, 15% on my wifes 2018 Sentra with 70000kms). Sparkplugs show minimal oil (Only #4 seems to have a tad). At a quart per 1000km's though, I would be expecting them to be wet. Here's the kicker, I run WMI. I'm thinking what if my compression rings are great, but I have an oil control ring issue on cyl4 and my WMI is steam cleaning the pistons and sparkplugs? I can still see the "Spool" logo on top of my CP pistons. The only time I see smoke out of the exhaust is in the high rpm/load range. So far, this is my main culprit. I'll probably turn off my WMI and go out with the car at spring pressure tomorrow and repull the plugs. Other thing that's strange though is that I have never seen any oil in my catch can. Thing is still dry after 4000kms. Cyl1 - Left, Cyl6 - Right. Valve seals - They're new and I would expect oil consumption on idle, first cold start or during decel. None of which is happening.  Crankcase pressure - I have 2x 10an valve cover lines to a vented catch can. Head drain and opened up internal oil drain paths. I also don't run E85. I've never seen any oil in my catch can. Doubtful this is causing any issues.  Rear main seal - I have no visible leaks, but figured maybe it was my rear main seal. After now having added 2-3 quarts, I would expect oil to leak out the bottom drain channel and/or my clutch to be slipping.  Let me know your thoughts. With winter coming and taking the car off the road until spring, I'm fine with pulling the motor apart but I would hate to take it all apart and the turbo was the issue in the end.   
    • Actually, the best option is probably to get some of the stronger aftermarket driveshafts that have both the 5x1 and 3x2 pattern on them, so OP can do whatever the hell OP likes with the diff in the future and not have all this angst. I posted a link to them sometime in the last 2 weeks, I'm sure.
×
×
  • Create New...