Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi I already have a apexi safc2 & have managed to score a brand new apexi sitc. I rang my tuner for a safc2 tune & I mentioned to him if it was worth me installing the apexi sitc, he said that it isn't worth installing because its old technology & known to be unreliable. Is this true? But I'm keen to install it as it was an effort to find it?

Hi there. My personal experience was first i had an SAFC2. Then i purchased a SITC and had this installed. There was no gain in power at all and the car did not feel any different. In my opinion this was a waste of money. So in my experience of now having a power fc (although they are hard to come by), Is a much better option in the way that it delivers it's power and it's ability to be able to handle after market mods like Z32 afm, bigger injectors, turbo etc. So if you ask me i would sell the SITC and the SAFC and try and source some sort of aftermarket full replacement ECU. Hope this helps. :)

Hi there. My personal experience was first i had an SAFC2. Then i purchased a SITC and had this installed. There was no gain in power at all and the car did not feel any different. In my opinion this was a waste of money. So in my experience of now having a power fc (although they are hard to come by), Is a much better option in the way that it delivers it's power and it's ability to be able to handle after market mods like Z32 afm, bigger injectors, turbo etc. So if you ask me i would sell the SITC and the SAFC and try and source some sort of aftermarket full replacement ECU. Hope this helps. :)

the only reason for this would be if the sitc wasnt adjusted at all. if you had the safc2 THEN got the sitc installed it wouldnt really be needed unless you started modding the car further than before.

it wont do anything if its set to 0.

the only reason for this would be if the sitc wasnt adjusted at all. if you had the safc2 THEN got the sitc installed it wouldnt really be needed unless you started modding the car further than before.

it wont do anything if its set to 0.

Of course this is true if the SITC is set to 0 it would not do a thing. It was adjusted and tuned on the dyno and still did not gain anything. Yet two weeks later i went back with the power fc with no other mods, this was installed and tuned and 15 kw was gained and the car was completely different in the way that it delivered the power. It was very smooth and just a totally different car to drive. Hope this help's. :closedeyes:

i noticed a big change over just having the safc2 i gained over 15rwkw with it i actually got all my parts stolen 6 months ago and put in an emanage ultimate and was more happy with the safc2 and sitc combo so i bought another one and went back to that. I know obviously the power fc will get you more gains and finer tuning points but for what it's worth i thought it was a decent upgrade.

  • 3 years later...

Just bumping an old thread here (sorry about that) but what is the adjustment on an S-ITC? I'm looking at getting one to increase my timing before boost and drop it a bit in the top end.

I googled them, and here http://www.ca.dsm.org/ARB/apexi_sitc.html it says + or - 15%, now 15% is SFA (on 15 degree base timing I’ll only get another couple degrees) is that correct? Or is it + or - 15 degrees (which would make more sense)?

Also, is it a blanket increase over the range (between rpms) then a spike to the next setting, or does it smooth and blend like an SAFC?

the only time i could see it useful is if you have an auto skyline?

otherwise you may find a powerfc would come up at the same price by the time you factor in two seperate installs, two seeprate tunes and buying both items

Why if you have an Auto skyline? PFC's for RB25's are well over $1k, I've already got an AFC Neo (cost $250) which I fitted my self, and i can get an S-ITC for $150 locally which i can also fit myself.

This looks like it should do what I need it to do, cheers though.

Personally I think half of your money probably goes towards the "rare" factor.

If PFC is not in your budget, then why not Nistune?

Plenty of good results and pricing is good, not too mention you could probably sell the SAFC you have now and be over half way towards the Nistune.

My 2c anyway.

I do agree that nistune is a great option, especially for a budget, but it’s just not what I'm after for this car. I'm happy with the stock tune; I just want to make mild adjustments here and there. This is still more cost effective than a nistune, without having to wire in a Z32 ECU (to keep VCT) and make other modifications for my Active LSD/AWD. Plus, simple fuel and ignition adjustments for correct mixtures are fine and easy to do myself, but a full tune with aftermarket management isn’t something that I’d want to tackle my self as it really requires a Dyno.

A nistune is definitely going to be my choice for my RB30DET (with RB20 ecu) build, as it has different cams, injectors, ecu, compression and capacity. But my R33 is a daily and has all standard running gear (turbo/injectors/afm etc) and perfect drivability, I’m just after some mild adjustment to give it a bit more response down low and allow me to run a bit more boost and drop the ignition timing up top.

Edited by SKiT_R31
I do agree that nistune is a great option, especially for a budget, but it's just not what I'm after for this car. I'm happy with the stock tune; I just want to make mild adjustments here and there. This is still more cost effective than a nistune, without having to wire in a Z32 ECU (to keep VCT) and make other modifications for my Active LSD/AWD. Plus, simple fuel and ignition adjustments for correct mixtures are fine and easy to do myself, but a full tune with aftermarket management isn't something that I'd want to tackle my self as it really requires a Dyno.
You need a dyno to tune SAFC and SITC. How are you measuring the afrs? Do you have a wide band meter? What are you going to use for knock detection?

SAFC and SITC are better than nothing - I used to have them before I converted to manual but they are crude tools compared to Nistune, PFC or Link etc.

why if you have an auto skyline? becuase there are no aftermarket stand alone ECU's that support auto properly

so you are stuck with the STD ECU & piggybacks on top

i see no legit reason to use SAFC and SITC and others on the normal ECU if you have manual GTST

its probably cheaper and easier and quicker and better results to just go powerfc (or nistune) straight off the bat

I have a wideband 02 sensor & EGT datalogger as well as electronic knock detection (tapping into the knock sensors) and a pretty good ear :O.

I self tuned my car a long time ago and have never had an issue; I'm just making some changes with my water+meth setup and boost delivery so i want some light ignition adjustment so I can keep low rpm economy and response.

I have quite lean AFR's (13:1), high compression (10:1), 20degree's timing running stock boost (6.5psi) before 4500rpm, where I wish to richen the mixture to 12:1 (currently at 12.5:1) I then wish to retard the timing ~ 5 degree's, up the boost to 10-12psi and run water+meth injection (boost activated at 7.5psi).

Currently I have 2 tunes, my econo-daily tune, and my power tune with high boost (which i have to retard the base timing) that utilises the water+meth injection.

All I am trying to do is incorporate both into the one usable tune (as its a paint in the ass to change and test every time) a compromise of having the power >4500rpm with the economy and response below it (without wasting the water+meth in daily driving).

My EGT's are loving it, I have no issues with detonation, relax kids it's not that high strung, I know what I’m doing, done it all too many times.

These piggy backs take basic rpm points to make adjustments with, quite easy to do on the street. Aftermarket management has multiple load points and variations which would make it a nightmare to tune on the street. It would be a headache to have to tune it on the track and I don’t want to pay for it to be left it in the hands of a Dyno tuner. And after all, it is just my daily which I’m only trying to get a bit more out of - I’m not building a ball breaking monster.

Edited by SKiT_R31

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, I refuse to buy their cheap ass crap! I do need to order a bunch of different nuts/bolts to refill my nut/bolt wall though. Maybe you could go for a walk through Bunnings for me? (Or send me some stuff from your work? )   I really struggle to work out how the US standardised to Metric in what the 70s or 80s, and yet, half a century later, there's been little done to actually bring it into fruition. It truly baffles me    On the whole Fastenal thing, I went reading their site (My god they sell a lot of varied stuff!), and it seems like it really depends what store you're near if you can walk in and just grab a few small things, or if that branch is primarily distribution with only a small window of "counter time" available (if at all). That definitely makes it harder, as move locations and it drastically changes your ability for success   For things like your M6x1.0, if you want to work on your own Skyline, and you also have a "home workshop" I'd recommend setting yourself up a small Nut/Bolt wall/section. It doesn't even need to be big at all. Most things depending on the diameter, will be a specific pitch, like the M6x1, M5x0.7 etc. Bigger bolts is mostly 1.5, except for a small number of things and that will come down to torque. From memory bolts for the brake calipers (and other things that need a lot of torque) will end up being a 1.25mm pitch. Save up a few dollars, and order a range of nuts/bolts. If you want to minimise cost a little, buy something like M6 x 40, and M6x70mm (1mm pitch) in both. In addition, buy yourself an M6x1mm thread chaser. That way you have long bolts that you can cut down to size, and then chase the threads out. Funnily enough, I find what I'd pay here for ordering 5 bolts, I can pay about 50% more and you'll get 100 of them.   If that doesn't quite work out due to space / ability to buy plenty up front, then each time you need some bolts, order 100 of what ever you're getting. Put them in clearly marked containers. Over a few years, you'll acquire plenty of different sizes, and will end up ordering less and less. And the cost for 100 bolts won't be much more than you paid for your 5 you needed to order anyway  Just takes a little planning ahead, by investigating what nuts/bolts you'll need, and ordering them before doing the job.     Edit: If it's also primarily for working on just the Skyline, for some reason my brain is screaming that at some point, either Nissan, Nismo, (Or possibly a third party) was selling a "kit" of every nut and bolt in a Skyline, purely for people restoring/rebuilding. It'd likely be quite expensive, but would give you every/any nut/bolt you need for stock/factory things. I'm not sure if it's still available, or even if it actually fully came to market, it's just something niggling in the back of my brain that you could look into further if that sort of thing interested you? (It might have been for the R32 GTR or something specifically too, and not just any Skyline)
    • 90lb/min @ 20psi is wonderful, not so much of a problem with the G35-1050's compressor efficiency (aside from how bad they roll back at higher pressure ratios).  The issue is more to do with the turbine's flow, which is why I'm not sold on going an even higher flowing compressor with the same turbine.  I'd say go back over Motive DVD's testing of the G35 1050 and Hawkins's comments regarding exhaust back pressure issues with it, I'd need to go back but I have in my head he went to the biggest hotside and ended up sacrificing a lot of spool (so it ended up behaving like a bigger turbo) and still had EMAP issues.  I've heard various other experiences along the lines of that. At this stage at least I rate all I've seen about Xonas (for transparency I've not used one directly, but I have spoke plenty with people who have) to have low exhaust restriction for the response they offer for any given setup - basically they allow the engine to breathe, which is good for the engine and makes making power a lot easier.  You arguably don't have to even push quite the same amount of airflow through an engine to make the same power if you don't have the bum plugged up with exhaust gas struggling to escape the engine due to an underflowing turbine.   In terms of reliability, to be fair I've had great luck with Garrett turbos as well - my GT3076R lasted forever, then I sold it and the next owner had no issues, then that car got sold and it was still going strong last I ever heard about it.  The trick is with the old GT-series turbos the compressors etc were no way near as efficient as what we have these days, it was almost hard to push them into severe overspeed situations without having a boost leak or something - and that is what often starts the failure situation.    In terms of your G35 I'm pretty sure you're running yours within sensible limits, something people with Xonas and Precision turbos aren't often so inclined to do.  The "compressor maps" are "Joe blogs ran 45psi through his 6466 so I can do the same" and built their setup to send it to the moon.  I've seen EMAP and compressor speed data where people have actually set that stuff up on Precisions and Xonas which have been run hard and the comp speed numbers are very very exciting at times - like I've seen 76mm Precisions run at rpm that you ideally shouldn't run a G35 1050 lol.   I know people who have run G-series Garretts hard and hard a failure, then replaced them with Pulsar turbos as a cheap "get it going" stop gap with the intent of doing a proper upgrade when THAT fails... and are still running the same thing.   Like anything, ymmv and it's not always to do with the quality or trustworthiness of said product. I've been provided with a bunch of compressor maps for Turbosmart turbos and will update my list based off that, they could prove to interesting reading and an interesting alternative as well.
    • Just cage it, call it a race car, and then fall in love with the chirp chirps through pit area!   Also, this is coming from someone with a completely locked diff...
    • I still have an old R32R left over from when they were a thing in the early 2000's. It was, for its time, done about right. But its time was 20 years ago.  I did try and update it a while back but it was cruelled by a (recommended) muppet of a tuna who couldnt tell his MAP from his TPS. The original spec was: Power FC, 700cc Sards, Nismo pump, 2860-5's, cams (Basically Poncam A's), Z32 AFM's and a half sorted oiling system. Thereabouts 430rwhp irrespective of what was done. So, yeah, very 1990's. I eventually got sick of it not being very refined and bought a Link G4 PNP with some 1000cc Bosch injectors. This was tuned badly and I put the car in the shed for a few years whilst I sulked and went and did other things. Ive come around to the idea of getting it going again so it has a new gearbox installed and some other minor things in the planning. So my questions are, variously (In the context of keeping the Link) What other sensors should I be running eg It has no wideband on it at the moment, nor fuel pressure. $? Is it worth chucking the old ignition system (ignitors etc) for new ignition coils? $2k? Cam/crank angle sensors? Can keep the aircon? $? Anything else? Sorry to launch another what should I do with my car thread but, you know, what should I do with my car? Random photo for historical context.
    • If you think that's harsh, go experience a KAAZ 🥲 Thoughts and prayers for Dose. I had mine modified by a diff shop to make it less brutal, no idea what they did but it's not as brutal as before. The Asian in me was being tight before and went KAAZ instead of a Nismo, lesson learned.
×
×
  • Create New...