Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

is it? I am aware of thinner wheel 45 instead of original size 50. It may be totally offset from orginal tyre but just minor affect on the speed...

I though the original tyres are 215/55-17? if so a 235/50-17 will be the closest overall diameter.

A 235/45-17 tyre will put your speedo and odo out by about 4%

  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

+1 yup wot he said. So when your speedo reads100kph you're actually only travelling at 96.3kph. On the bright side that's in your favour when going thru a multinova and you'll clock up less K's on the odo than you will actually do :thumbsup:

Edited by mosoto

+1 yup wot he said. So when your speedo reads100kph you're actually only travelling at 96.3kph. On the bright side that's in your favour when going thru a multinova and you'll clock up less K's on the odo than you will actually do :thumbsup:

So if speedo reads 100kph and actually travelling at 96.3kph wont that mean that odometer reading of 100km will actually be only 96.3km travelled and hence will clock up 4% more kms than the odometer reads????

So if speedo reads 100kph and actually travelling at 96.3kph wont that mean that odometer reading of 100km will actually be only 96.3km travelled and hence will clock up 4% more kms than the odometer reads on the odometer????????

FIXED.

but yup you're right sorry my bad..............DOWNSIDE you'll clock up more K's on the odo than you've actually done.

Hey guys just my two cents, i run achilles on my V35 (sedan) 245/35r20, for the price they are they are awesome tyres done 20000 on them daily driving (i drive pretty hard on em too) got at least another 30000 left in them and and they stick like glue and have like no road noise. Also i better mention that we at bridgestone have just launched 2 new tyre ranges the MY01 and the Turanza serenity, but i cant vouch for them personally yet as i havent even seen them yet because we only released them on the 3rd of this month

  • 2 years later...

Hi Guys, I had one of my front tyres punctured (Bridgestone Potenza) and need a new tyre to replace that without having to spend too much. I have been quoted Sumitomo (HTR I think) $220 and Hankook K115 $190 fitted and balanced.

Any thoughts on that anyone?

By law your tyres must be rated to do a sustained speed equal to your car's top speed, regardless of whether that speed is legal or not.

I'd get that stuff right, as cops check that data when considering whether to defect your tyres as roadworthy or not.

What a load of rubbish.

The only legal requirements for tyre fitting are that the speed rating of Australian passenger cars be rated S or better and that the load index of the tyres meet or exceed the manufactures spec found on the tyre placard in the drivers door. There are other rules like tyre cannot ride outside of the body etc but basically if you meet or exceed the placard you are good to go.

FIXED.

but yup you're right sorry my bad..............DOWNSIDE you'll clock up more K's on the odo than you've actually done.

Sorry to hijack the thread but is it possible to get the speedo calibrated that it shows the correct speed?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It's weird to me that you say this because I'm pretty sure locals with relatively standard standalone tunes (boost/barometric compensated alpha-N) still have driveability issues when they pop intercooler hoses. Maybe with enough data I can just train some kind of model that spits out an expected grams/cyl given every sensor input except MAF like what FCA did with their Pentastar 3.6 ECU logic. Basically stock everything. The main motivation honestly is to have a sensor that can be a decent baseline source of truth. In scenarios you're describing obviously it won't work every time but it seems to me the number of corner cases that exist in MAF load is maybe not as severe and difficult to manage vs ITB alpha-N with some MAP/barometric compensation.
    • What are your plans for your blow off valves? Purely plumb back? How soft will the spring in them be? AFM can be tricky to get super smooth and nice, especially depending on the rest of the system, and then can be very easily upset if something slightly changes. IE, even if you run recirc blow off valves, you could still see issues getting it to behave at certain load points as turbos might start to spool, but you release the throttle but it's not enough pressure to crack the bov open to recirc, and you can end up with reversion which can cause double metering, and hence dumping of fuel into the system, and stalling the engine.   If you're going to run a map sensor for closed loop boost control from the ECU, what makes you want to keep the AFM?    
    • It's not bad, it's just not flexible. And say if you have any leaks between the MAF and plenum, well then your load axis goes out the window. Here's a real world scenario, I blew off an intercooler hose last track day, as the clamp decided to Bluetooth itself somewhere. Still continued to do 2 laps and drive it to the pub for a couple of beers then home. Good luck doing that with a MAF setup 
    • Is MAF load really that bad? I'm not trying to do big power, my only real desire is VCAM and flex fuel support so I'm not terrified of blowing my engine apart from CA's appalling 95 RON "premium" fuel. Stuff like playing with closed loop boost control and really dialing in my transient fueling and ignition are frankly just to prove to myself I remembered something from uni.
    • Thats what ive been doing. Ive got a million questions but i know theyve probably all been answered before at some stage. Todays research included nismo heritage seat covers, s3 projector headlight retrofits and how to remove/paint the rocker covers 
×
×
  • Create New...