Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys just after some help and opinions on turbo setup.

I've got r32 gtst with rb26/30 its going to be built strong to support 500+ hp,just dont want to go to big and have to much lag nor go to small and run out of puff! still on the fence with single or twin aswell all the help will be much appreciated

thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/185121-turbo-setup-for-track-car/
Share on other sites

from my brief experience the amount of power is only as useful to how how much you can put to the ground.

ie. my car makes 220 rwkw and was sliding round corners and wheelspinning out of them, also braking, the shitter your tyres the longer the stopping distance.

don't forget suspension or tyres, otherwise 500hp and 250hp will be just as quick

Yeah I think with a relatively lightweight 32 gtst (which obviously is RWD), its not going to be as important how much power you are making, more *how* you make the power.

If you are making 500hp with a lightswitch style power delivery, youll most likely find that youll be faster with 400hp that is made progressivly and smoothly.

Also you need to ask some other questions...

What wheels/tyres are you planning on running?

What is the planned use for the cars? General thrashing on track days, or is it being built to suit regulations to race in a particular series?

How important is reliability? How much can you spend if something goes wrong?

A single power figure really doesnt mean much.

With an idea of the cars use people here should be able to give you a far better idea of what will suit your needs :yucky:

no worries ill give some more specs

ebach springs with bilstein shocks at the moment

r32 gtr diff with 1.5 way lsd

strut brace front and rear

full cams approved cage getting made at this time

sway bars

camber kit front

adj castor rods

adj control arms

bridgestone RE55S/ dunlop second hand full slick

brembo f50 calipers/ DBA 343mm rotor

etc!

track only car, super sprints and track days club campionships just what ever im able to get to,

did have roughly 320hp before didnt have trouble with grip but obviously cant go jumping on the throttle half way through a corner with 500hp, although with full slicks it stuck to the ground very well with previous power.not saying im going to run that kind of power was just trying to say im not just getting the motor thrown together, its get built as strong as possible and as much as i can afford

just after what other people have used or tried or what to stay away from

thanks

Edited by azzr32

26/30 and for circuit use? nice low mounts either 2530/GTRS or a T04Z (the little one). Assuming you aren't raising the rev limit you want early boost for flexibility. Will still make plenty of power for a rwd :D

thanks for the comments, its track only car it will only see the circuit, i want as much power as i can make without going to big with turbo setup, the guy im getting to build the motor has only really done setups for drag cars so im just trying to get a idea of what other people are having sucsess with,

im not building it to get a power figure i just want it responsive as much as possible with good power range and hopefully get good times out of it.

thanks

Ok, so of its going to be a dedicated track car, i would assuem you are going to bin A/C, trim all the silly stuff that Nissan thinks we want to be comfortable?

If so, stick with building a 300rwkws car. With only 1130-1180kgs of weight to move around you will be better of limiting power to 300-320rwkws. That is a stupid power to weight ratio and it means you are not going to have to go silly with diffs and shocks trying to get the thing to hook up and stop.

I will also remind you its easier to drive a slow car fast then a fast car fast. So a 300rwks sub 1200kg car isnt going to be slow..but it wont be too hard to drive. If you go chasing more power you will need more cooling, more brakes, more tyres, most likley 18" wheels which are mroe expesnive themselves as well as the tyres costing an arm.

So, its your car, and feel free to build whatever car you lile. But a GT30R would be the way i go.

Perhaps undrivable was a bit strong...

I see so many posts where someone has big plans with some fairly lofty horsepower goals and people advise them that they will never be able to put that power to the ground...

To my way of thinking, unless you can fry the tyres in 5th half way down the back straight, you do not have too much power. Part of the art of racing is learning the limits of traction available in each gear in a particular situation, putting your brain rather than your ego in control of your right foot, and utilising it to the max.

This is providing the motor is not a grenade and will be relaqtively reliable...

How often do ypu see posts where someone has built a motor and is now looking for more power, often needing to replace expensive parts they have already bought.

My advice is to set your horsepower goals where you want to end up, learn to drive the car to it's potential and develope your suspension/traction as you go...

Perhaps undrivable was a bit strong...

I see so many posts where someone has big plans with some fairly lofty horsepower goals and people advise them that they will never be able to put that power to the ground...

To my way of thinking, unless you can fry the tyres in 5th half way down the back straight, you do not have too much power. Part of the art of racing is learning the limits of traction available in each gear in a particular situation, putting your brain rather than your ego in control of your right foot, and utilising it to the max.

This is providing the motor is not a grenade and will be relaqtively reliable...

How often do ypu see posts where someone has built a motor and is now looking for more power, often needing to replace expensive parts they have already bought.

My advice is to set your horsepower goals where you want to end up, learn to drive the car to it's potential and develope your suspension/traction as you go...

Cant say i totally disagree...with the exception of the last line. 15k on power upgrades whilst you develop suspension etc will mean you end up with a slower car then you would if you had of pocketed your money, spent your money with a view to making your car quicker and more reliable...buys you a lot more of a chance to learn how to drive the thing. Not to mention that setting up a car like that will mean you will have to confront one of the more expensive upgrades earlier....brakes. Poor handling, slower corner speed, higher arrival speed, low grip means you wil need big brakes...which is another dead 5-8k :)

Perhaps undrivable was a bit strong...

I see so many posts where someone has big plans with some fairly lofty horsepower goals and people advise them that they will never be able to put that power to the ground...

To my way of thinking, unless you can fry the tyres in 5th half way down the back straight, you do not have too much power. Part of the art of racing is learning the limits of traction available in each gear in a particular situation, putting your brain rather than your ego in control of your right foot, and utilising it to the max.

This is providing the motor is not a grenade and will be relaqtively reliable...

How often do ypu see posts where someone has built a motor and is now looking for more power, often needing to replace expensive parts they have already bought.

My advice is to set your horsepower goals where you want to end up, learn to drive the car to it's potential and develope your suspension/traction as you go...

Mainly because good suspension/brakes/tyres and everything else comes first.

Is you strip all the crap out of the car you dont need power.

Its easier on brakes, suspension and tyres to boot, so its win-win

IMO your better off focusing on a nice responsive car (again, around the 300-330rwkw mark), and then focus on all the areas that come together to make the car fast. Power is but a small factor in the scale of it all.

Having to constantly battle a car thats going to shred tyres with the slightest miss use of throttle isnt for everyone, where a car with a good setup that have a board power range, is much better suited.

Totally agree...

I had assumed we were starting with a car that had a reasonable suspension/brake package as azzr32 had described earlier.

(ebach springs with bilstein shocks at the moment, r32 gtr diff with 1.5 way lsd, strut brace front and rear, full cams approved cage, sway bars, camber kit front, adj castor rods, adj control arms, bridgestone RE55S/ dunlop second hand full slick, brembo f50 calipers/ DBA 343mm rotor, etc)

Using this spec as a starting point it may well be easier to ' learn to drive the car to it's potential and develope your suspension/traction as you go...' with your target hp on board.

If nothing else it will show how far you need to go :)

With my own car I have spent just over $12k on a good adjustable suspension package, a 343mm/330mm brake setup, rebuilt LSD rear end and wheels and tyres. The basics...

And I'm still running around with the original 120kw...

I also agree with your comments regarding getting your priorities right with the engine build. For a track car the main focus should be on building a responsive usable package, although I still believe that can be achieved around the 500hp level.

Using my own plans as an example (as I think azzr32 and I are after a similar result) a forged bottom end, well preped head, the correct cams, decent manifolding and a pair of Garret HKS2530 equivalents should see the job done. I have mentioned 500rwhp only as an indication of the performance level I'm after. The priority is to build an engine with the widest, fattest torque curve possible and the best response I can achieve.

azzr32 is one step ahead of me as he has the RB26 ITBs...

Cheers

With my own car I have spent just over $12k on a good adjustable suspension package, a 343mm/330mm brake setup, rebuilt LSD rear end and wheels and tyres. The basics...

And I'm still running around with the original 120kw...

Can you let me know what suspension you have? Also more details about the brakes

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey lads  so im finally putting together my rb30 forged bottom end and ran into an issue. I measured my main bearing clearance with arp main studs torqued to 60 ft-lbs using ACL H series STD size bearings and standard, un-ground crank shaft journals and got an oil clearance reading of about 1.3 thou measuring straight up and down and about 2.8 thou measuring at a 45 degree angle (just above and below the parting line). My machine shop said they measured the main tunnel and it was all within spec (they didnt say the actual measurement) and to go with a standard size bearing, which i have done and the clearance is too tight, I'm guessing because of the extra clamping force from the arp studs distorting the main tunnel. I was wanting to run about 2.5 thou main bearing clearance.  My questions are: 1. could i just use the HX extra 1 thou clearance ACL bearings? that would fix my straight up and down clearance making it about 2.3 thou, but then would the side to side clearance be too big at around 3.8 thou? 2. what actually is the recommended main bearing clearance for measuring near the parting line / side to side. i know its supposed to be bigger as the bearing has some eccentricity built into it but how much more clearance should there be compared to the straight up and down measurement? at the moment there is about 1.5thou difference, is that acceptable or should it be less? 3. If i took the engine block + girdle back to the machine shop and got them to line bore the main tunnel (like i told them to do the first time, but they said it didnt need it) what bearing size would i buy? the STD size bearing shells already slide in fairly easily with no real resistance, some even falling out if i tip the girdle up-side-down. If im taking material out of the main tunnel would i need a bearing with extra material on the back side to make up for it? this is probably confusing af to read so if something doesn't make sense let me know and ill try explaining in a different way. My machine shop doesn't come back from christmas break until mid January, hence why i'm asking these questions here. TIA for any help or info 
    • I bought the model back in Japan in Feb. I realised I could never build it, looked around for people who could build it, turns out there's some very skilled people out there that will make copies of 1:1 cars or near enough. I'm not really a photo guy... but people were dragging me in a group chat for the choice of bumper as someone else saw the car before it was finished as they are also a customer of that shop. I took the photo in the above post because I was pretty confident that the lip would work wonders for it. Here's some more in-progress and almost-done pics. It gives a good enough idea as to what the rear looks like!   I have also booked in a track day at the end of January. Lets all hope that is nothing but pure fun and games. If it's not pure fun and games, well, I've already got half an engine spare in the cupboard 
    • Well, do ya, punk? Seriously though, let's fu<king go! The colour and kit looks amazing on the car. Do you have any shots from the rear? I don't quite follow how the model came around. You bought the white kit and he modified it to match your car? Looks nuts either way!
    • So my car is finally back from paint! This took an absolutely insane amount of work and should get it's own build thread - but I didn't build it. It was completed by Troy @ https://scalekustoms.com.au/ I originally bought the AOSHIMA URAS Type R kit while I was in Japan, it's supposed to look like this when assembled: Now, I thought that was cool enough until I opened the box with Dismay, as there's no way I could possibly have completed it. The thing is 1/24 and has details down to the steering wheel horn button, which is a 2mm diameter sticker. I originally wondered if someone could make it at all, as is - But then things got a little carried away. It's worth noting that the model does not have an openable bonne, let alone engine bay, OR an openable boot. - Troy has worked wonders with 3D printer and presumably better eyes than I will ever have. My photos suck, so I will post up some of his in-progress ones he sent to me during the way. Unsuprisingly, he is very detailed. A lot of these are out of order. But he: 1) Made a LS engine and an engine bay appear out of thin air 2) Made the bonnet removable 3) Printed the rims I will buy in the future (or any rim you want) 4) Printed and added the wing that is going on 5) Tinted my back windows as this is what my car has IRL (privacy glass) 6) Added a licence plate. 7) Somehow did the interior 8) 3D Printed my actual seats 9) Made the exhaust under the car connect even though this is likely invisible. 10) Created a boot with my fking battery box, power steering reservoir, subwoofer and toolboxes back there. To say it's insane is an understatement. And I f**ked it all up because when I was re-mounting the wing (it broke in transit) I spilled glue everywhere and ripped paint up and Gregged the rear half of the car. Which about makes sense. Also, this arrived on the same day. Quite the change from: I spent 16 hours per day over the next 3 days pre-christmas putting the interior back together, mounting lip, fixing various bodykit problems with window mouldings, etc. and servicing, rebuilding my 370z brakes to go on the car 'soon', messing with heights to check clearances for new wheels, etc. I also had a foray into mounting wiper-mounted washer jets which was an absolute disaster. The bodyshop has welded (and painted) over the stock jet locations for reasons unknown to everybody (i.e they forgot) I also wanted to wire in the oil pressure sensor on Christmas Eve which was a BAD IDEA. You do not know terror like pulling your ECU apart, pinning in half-fitting pins that aren't the right ones, but trying anyway because it's Christmas eve, putting your ECU back together and having a no-start condition with a fuel pump not priming. Then you undo all your work and the fuel pump still doesn't prime. So after all that terror and horror and pain and tedious disassembly, the issue was the relay in the boot which seems to have died/stuck when I was turning the car off and on about 700 times testing shitty washer jets. I also re-wired the fuel pump power plug which fell apart in my hands. I am very happy I had 3 extra pre-made ones from a few posts/last Christmas's breakdown. https://bluewireautomotive.com/products/10-x-pcm-ecm-ecu-terminals I have put an order for these in, so I can actually add the pins to the ECU properly. The commodore ECU does not have the pins for Oil Pressure via ODB2. However the ECU can support it if you create the pins and wire them in. So for round two, and somehow attempting to route that into the engine bay through my impossible engine bay grommet is a fight for another day. It's 40C in Melbourne tomorrow, I am half tempted to drive the car with the aircon on to deliver presents to my partner's family and see if it helps with the overheating-on-40C-days-in-traffic-with-aircon-on-only issue that the vents were intended to solve. Do I feel lucky?
    • Yes, while being... strictly unnecessary. Tuning is a bit like quantum physics. You don't need to understand what Schroedinger's equation actually means. You just need to run the computation and accept the answers. With tuning, you just push page up/down until the exhaust tells you that you've got the fuel right. The VE can stay hidden behind the curtain like the Wizard of Oz and you'll never need to know what he looked like.
×
×
  • Create New...