Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You say you have unacceptable amount of piston slap , like how nuch clearence? What was the clearence ( piston to bore) when it was built? Was the ring gap meassured in the bore ? if yes what was the gap? Are the bores worn now? Can you still see the crosshatch hone ? How was th engine run in?

My guess is that the piston rings were broken in assebly or maybe you didn't have enough gap and they broke when they got hot and expended. I can't realy say without knowing the answers to the above . Don't forget when using forgies you have to have bigger piston to bore clearence than cast pistons .

Piston clearance and ring gap i will find out tomorrow.

I didnt measure myself the gaps and clearances when the engine was built, i can only ask the engine builder what he would of set them at...

Yes the bores are slightly worn now, no 6 is slightly scored from where the ring came past the piston and needs rebore. All bores are glazed with some patches of cross hatching.

Engine was run in on a dyno for its first kays, with running in oil for probly the first 1000, filter and oil changed within first half hour of running.

Will get pics of rings and measure top ring dimensions.

Today i got pics of the conrod bearings and the rings, took measurements.

Current 2nd ring end gap: 50thou !

Current piston to bore clearance: a tight 9thou (4.5 either side) !

And something else:

The conrod bearings; the top bearing (the one with load on it) appears to have slight pitting, you can see the copper colour coming through - see pic. The lower bearing of the same set is fine, no copper. Apparently this would be caused by the 'banging' of detonation.

Lower bearing on right, top on left.

post-17897-1190189687_thumb.jpg

Yes the second ring has the step in it as its sposed to, so the shape of the top rings is purely from wear.

Also the ring lands look like this:

post-17897-1190189444_thumb.jpg

Measurements of the broken top ring:

post-17897-1190189729_thumb.jpg

:D

I don't think you are measuring right, 9 thou is far to much clearence . Where do you measure the piston? piston to bore clearence should be no more then 4 thou for forgies and like 1.5-2 thou for stockers (cast).

50 thou ring gap is to bid as well, it should be like 15 thou max.

The bearings are shot, possibly due to detonation.

Start rebuilding and this time make sure whoever does it they measure everything and double check to make sure you don't have to built it again.

Today i got pics of the conrod bearings and the rings, took measurements.

Current 2nd ring end gap: 50thou !

Current piston to bore clearance: a tight 9thou (4.5 either side) !

And something else:

The conrod bearings; the top bearing (the one with load on it) appears to have slight pitting, you can see the copper colour coming through - see pic. The lower bearing of the same set is fine, no copper. Apparently this would be caused by the 'banging' of detonation.

Lower bearing on right, top on left.

post-17897-1190189687_thumb.jpg

Yes the second ring has the step in it as its sposed to, so the shape of the top rings is purely from wear.

Also the ring lands look like this:

post-17897-1190189444_thumb.jpg

Measurements of the broken top ring:

post-17897-1190189729_thumb.jpg

:(

I don't think you are measuring right, 9 thou is far to much clearence . Where do you measure the piston? piston to bore clearence should be no more then 4 thou for forgies and like 1.5-2 thou for stockers (cast).

50 thou ring gap is to bid as well, it should be like 15 thou max.

The bearings are shot, possibly due to detonation.

Start rebuilding and this time make sure whoever does it they measure everything and double check to make sure you don't have to built it again.

No, trust me im measuring right. The pistons fit like a dick in a shirt sleeve. Im measuring near the outside of the block, not say next to the next bore if that makes any sense.

If i can fit a 9thou feeler down in between the piston and bore (far enough down past the ring lands, yes) this is accurate yes? same deal with the ring gaps. Rings in bore, push down with the piston a little to make it square, then measure. i had to combine a 35th and a 15th feeler...!

Possibly the reason for the massive piston clearance is the extreme heating of the piston; expanding compressing explanding and then compressing finally to a smaller size maybe? Is this a fair assumption?

Theres no way the bores can wear that much? ill measure dia of the pistons tomorrow.

Thanks guys keep it coming if you can please.

I really dont want to have to build a third...

Here is the ACL RB26 page http://www.aclperformance.com.au/NissanRB2...rgedPistons.htm

5 thou is the clearance so the build was wrong from the start. Pistons won't shrink. There is no way the bore has worn that much if you can still see crosshatching.

That ring gap is horrendous.

Quite possibly the combination of the large clearances combined to induce excessive detonation through high quantities of oil in the combustion chamber. Oil is a detonation contributor.

I can offer a decent machinist/builder or two in Melbourne if you want, or just send it up to proengines for a good job. Word is he's tip top and has posted a detailed thread on here of one of his engine builds.

Thanks Geoff. What you really need to do is get an accurate measurement of everything. If the clearance is that large, you need to find whether it is the bore being too big or the piston collapsed. take it to someone who can measure it with a micrometer or bore gauge. If the bore is the right size, I'd imagine that the pistons have collapsed. They can do this if they are severely overheated. I haven't seen a set of pistons in years that have been made to the wrong size, they are made to give the correct clearance at the nominal size. The shape of the top ring land is a very good indicaton of detonation, the same with the hammering on the top conrod bearing shell.

The ring gap increases very quickly as things change, for every .001mm in bore size, you get .00314mm increase in ring gap (Pi x Diameter). The same deal as the outer face of the ring wears. If you measure the radial depth of the ring in different positions it will show the wear on the ring. They rarely wear as much right at the gap.

Take the parts back to whoever did the job and ask them to check it, if it ended up being a warranty job, they have first right of repair anyway. They may even help you out with fixing it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Appreciate the feedback. It is street car, but not a daily. Last week I got a quote from a good exhaust shop for a decat, one which is bolt-on, bolt-off to be easily replaceable. I got quoted for around €150. I usually do push the motor, but I wasn't in this case to make sure that no damage is done until I get the cat sorted. I think it's best to also ask the exhaust shop for the other option and see what they can do. If (big if) I were to decat though, would it be best to tune the car or would the stock ECU handle it? As far as I know, the stock ECU is not tunable and that would require additional purchases.
    • As above, definitely bash it or get it replaced with a high flow unit.
    • get some flares on them, or wider guards haha
    • Another question sorry, what stainless do u use in the turbo external WG plumb back piping? Is it 321, 316 or 304?
    • Right, its been a while for updating this car, but I made some small but important progress today. In the end I bought an Ecutek dongle from the Australian distributor Tunehouse (for local hardware support) but have gone with a remote tune from Racebox in the US (because they have done millions of these, and I could not find any tuner where I could access the tune anyway as they are all password locked). The App is reasonably easy to work with, but the PC software reminds me of Haltech's ECU Manager that you need to use with the Plat Pro ECUs, it is a nightmare.  Anyway, I sent the details over, got back a tune file and a request for data logs. I finally got a chance to access a private test track today as they want redline logs in 3rd and 4th, and have sent them back for the first round of reviews. The main difference in the tune is going from 1.0 (stock) to 1.3 bar (19psi), although I'm sure is a lot of other stuff in the background. Keeping in mind this is a dead stock car with 125,000klm, this is what the App's performance test claimed: Before After Interesting to note that both 400m tests had the same terminal speed (158klm/h) but different ETs. And no, the speed limiter seems to be higher than that at 186kl/h. Summary of the key logged parameters for the 3rd and 4th gear runs were: Those little turbos were certainly whizzing at 200,000rpm+.  Also I'm really not that excited about oil pressure 55psi at redline so I think I'll go thicker than 5w30 (nissan recommend 0w20....) and see if that improves it. Other than that (and the big boost spike....) everything looks good as a start to me.
×
×
  • Create New...