Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

its only limited to around 30% under about 3000rpm

And its a pain in the arse to tune around. I still have the throttle restriction, my 0-100 time would be around 4.5 seconds but it could be much better.

I think it could be related to speed, under 30kph perhaps?

And its a pain in the arse to tune around. I still have the throttle restriction, my 0-100 time would be around 4.5 seconds but it could be much better.

I think it could be related to speed, under 30kph perhaps?

im wondering how you intend on getting around speed cut :?

4.5 is damn quick. what mods have you got to get those numbers?

(i just had a look at your Garage). You gave exhaust 6/10 and intake 10/10? Did you do a full exhaust turbo back? or just cat-back?

No more boost/mods to pull those numbers?

Edited by Sage222
4.5 is damn quick. what mods have you got to get those numbers?

(i just had a look at your Garage). You gave exhaust 6/10 and intake 10/10? Did you do a full exhaust turbo back? or just cat-back?

No more boost/mods to pull those numbers?

Plenty of both, I haven't updated the garage for a few months.

The previous exhaust was too loud so I bought a s/h cat back and fabricated my own 3.5 inch dump into a highflow cat.

I run a fairly small highflow at 20psi on E85. Current tune is 300awkw.

  • Like 1
Plenty of both, I haven't updated the garage for a few months.

The previous exhaust was too loud so I bought a s/h cat back and fabricated my own 3.5 inch dump into a highflow cat.

I run a fairly small highflow at 20psi on E85. Current tune is 300awkw.

Hang on... a custom exhaust, some ethenal, a high flow turbo running 20psi and you make 300awkw?? wow thats impressive.

Can the factory transmission, ECU, and injectors handle all that?

(you have me very interested) :D

Hang on... a custom exhaust, some ethenal, a high flow turbo running 20psi and you make 300awkw?? wow thats impressive.

Can the factory transmission, ECU, and injectors handle all that?

(you have me very interested) :D

He has an FMIC, upgraded trans, 610cc injectors, Tomei fuel pump and is running an E-manage Ultimate.....plus a couple of other home made bit's all of which you will need.

He has an FMIC, upgraded trans, 610cc injectors, Tomei fuel pump and is running an E-manage Ultimate.....plus a couple of other home made bit's all of which you will need.

How much all up you reckon Scotty? 6-8k? Pretty good value I'd say...

Then again a friend of mine got his stock 04 WRX to 190 awkw for 6k...all done at STI at Docklands...

How much all up you reckon Scotty? 6-8k? Pretty good value I'd say...

Then again a friend of mine got his stock 04 WRX to 190 awkw for 6k...all done at STI at Docklands...

Gearbox wiped out the budget, 4k there, Highflow was another 2k, the rest was bit by bit. I would guess 10k total with me doing all the labour/fabrication.

200awkw is about the limit of the stock intake, stock turbo will flow that at higher boost but will then fail. I would be interested to see what a stock setup would do on e85...

Really? I thought M35 had ~140 - 150 awkw...so exhaust adds 50 awkw!???

Yes, You are correct..

I think Cam is referring to adding an Emanage or something similar to produce a more efficient result that should be tunable to 190kw on the stock injectors.

Scotty, What mods did you do to the gearbox to cost $4K??

Valve body upgrade, metal plates between the clutches laser cut from thinner material so they could fit extra friction plates, Dominator 3k high stall torque converter. It was the first one they had seen, its not like other RE5's apparently.

I think I hit 179awkw on stock boost, if the standard turbo was steel wheeled, 200 wouldn't be a problem.

  • Like 1
Yes, You are correct..

I think Cam is referring to adding an Emanage or something similar to produce a more efficient result that should be tunable to 190kw on the stock injectors.

Yep, hence what I typed.

Bargain! :)

Should be able to get around that power level from stock with just an exhaust and tune on a VQ25det M35!

OK for the tv to work youll need a new tv tuner, whats available now im not sure that Asuka dont sell them (so i read)

getting the tv working while youre driving is not advisable and against the law, but if you HAVE to, there are override boxes that can do all this and literally just plug in. they come from japan, im surprised your car didnt have one fitted already!

check under the DVD tray andsee if there is a green light that is also a button. thats the override button for the tv.

  • Like 1

yeh im pretty sure i dont have one.

looking at the Trans ecu it looks like something was added and then taken off back to stock. Both me and scott assumed it would be the overide.

where can I get a Tuner from? its it a simple Jaycar type mod or is it more complex than im thinking. I was expecting it to be like the FM Band expander.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...