Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

At the moment im deciding if i should make my car into a responsive type car or buy a 450rwkw straight line monster which i have on offer at the moment.

Ive been looking for a while now at turbos and have found that there is an r33 bolt on version of the disco potato which retails for $1350ish, just wondering if there is anyone with one of these fitted, or any informion on the subject.

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/185979-gt28rs-on-r33/
Share on other sites

GT3071/GT3076 will keep you happy for some time.

450rwkw straight line monster with rwd? Maybe at the drags with slicks and a big rpm launch.

It would be useless on the street; not because of the power but because it will lag like buggery and offer bugger all acceleration in the first 2 gears when rolling on the throttle.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/185979-gt28rs-on-r33/#findComment-3363814
Share on other sites

A GT2860RS is very similar to the HKS spec Garrett GT2530 , all its missing is an RB specific T3 flanged GT28 turbine housing which HKS had made for their RB specific version of the GT2530 .

The real GT3071R (cartridge no 700177-5023) is a step up in turbine and compressor size and in its smallest available 0.63 A/R integral gate turbine housing may be ok - at least its the propper non cropped GT30 turbine in its matching factory GT30 turbine housing and integral wastegate . To keep its external dimensions a little smaller you could possibly ask for one of these to be supplied with a T04B rather than T04E compressor cover .

For a buy/bolt turbo the real GT3071R is probably the go for an enthusiastically driven car . For best results you MUST insist on that 700177-5023 cartridge (centre housing and wheels) and MUST use the genuine Garrett GT30 integral wastegate exhaust housing . If you get sold smilar cartridges with cropped turbines and aftermarket exhaust housings (or modified OEM) then the result will suffer . You have to insist on the right bits to have any hope of it working as the design engineers intended , to the point where you won't discuss any variations on the real one . I know this sounds harsh but when buying tyres they're all black and made of rubber - they don't all work the same though do they .

Your bux your call , cheers A .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/185979-gt28rs-on-r33/#findComment-3363958
Share on other sites

I reckon I do . Firstly that turbo in the pictures is not using the 700177-5023 cartridge . Its compressor looks like the evil 7/14 blade T04S type so it won't be a 71.1 mm OD GT35 family comp wheel . Can't be bothered going into all the nitty gritty again but sufficient to say that a 76mm OD compressor won't like working with the Hitachi comp housing . The Hitachi exhaust housing and GT30 turbines are not the best bed mates either . Both wheels really need housings that can support more flow to give off their best . I think the real 0.63 GT3071R in its native 0.63 A/R turbine housing would be a better all round turbo on an RB25DET .

Cheers A .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/185979-gt28rs-on-r33/#findComment-3366932
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Means something is not set up right, tune/calibration related.  
    • Finally replaced the previous temporary mesh indicator surrounds (temporary was the last 10+ years 😂) with a 3D printed GTR style version for the front indicators. I think it looks a lot nicer than the old setup and at least the indicators now point in the correct direction rather than angled off. Needed a little bit of tweaking to deal with the intercooler piping but got there in the end. Old and new photos below. 
    • It's weird to me that you say this because I'm pretty sure locals with relatively standard standalone tunes (boost/barometric compensated alpha-N) still have driveability issues when they pop intercooler hoses. Maybe with enough data I can just train some kind of model that spits out an expected grams/cyl given every sensor input except MAF like what FCA did with their Pentastar 3.6 ECU logic. Basically stock everything. The main motivation honestly is to have a sensor that can be a decent baseline source of truth. In scenarios you're describing obviously it won't work every time but it seems to me the number of corner cases that exist in MAF load is maybe not as severe and difficult to manage vs ITB alpha-N with some MAP/barometric compensation.
    • What are your plans for your blow off valves? Purely plumb back? How soft will the spring in them be? AFM can be tricky to get super smooth and nice, especially depending on the rest of the system, and then can be very easily upset if something slightly changes. IE, even if you run recirc blow off valves, you could still see issues getting it to behave at certain load points as turbos might start to spool, but you release the throttle but it's not enough pressure to crack the bov open to recirc, and you can end up with reversion which can cause double metering, and hence dumping of fuel into the system, and stalling the engine.   If you're going to run a map sensor for closed loop boost control from the ECU, what makes you want to keep the AFM?    
    • It's not bad, it's just not flexible. And say if you have any leaks between the MAF and plenum, well then your load axis goes out the window. Here's a real world scenario, I blew off an intercooler hose last track day, as the clamp decided to Bluetooth itself somewhere. Still continued to do 2 laps and drive it to the pub for a couple of beers then home. Good luck doing that with a MAF setup 
×
×
  • Create New...