Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey, just need some advice on wat size exhaust housing is more suitable for a gt35r, its for r33 rb25, engine has stock internals but has all support mods, i've heard that the 0.86 comes onto boost at about 4000 and i'm pretty happy with that, but just want to know when boost comes on with the 0.63 housing, thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/186904-gtr35r-063-or-86/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

hey, just need some advice on wat size exhaust housing is more suitable for a gt35r, its for r33 rb25, engine has stock internals but has all support mods, i've heard that the 0.86 comes onto boost at about 4000 and i'm pretty happy with that, but just want to know when boost comes on with the 0.63 housing, thanks

Ive fitted a .63 to a stock rb26, it made 327rwkw at 18psi, and 309 at 16psi. comes on at about 3500

thanks for that mate, so on an rb25 boost would come on at about 3500 as well then, i've heard that it can come on real early at liek 2500 which is why i was leaning more toward the bigger housing, does the 0.63 choke the turbo up top as i want something that pulls hard to redline, i'm not too worried about lag if it's going to kill my topend

Edited by scarface
HypeR33 - What does it ramp up like? Light switch or does it come on smoothly?

its pretty smooth...there is a pretty big jump in acceleration and keeps on going past redline. I went for the bigger exhaust housing so that it was a bit more subtle and not a off/on boost transition. Still a lot of fun to drive :)

post-15008-1190811176_thumb.jpg

Thats not a bad curve, Id still want mine to come on at around 3500 as I've got stock rods and dont wanna rev past 7k rpm (my limiter is at 6900 atm) But then again im not chasing as much power as what you've got, and ive noticed that yours noses over at 7000. I want a 'more tractable' street engine i guess you could say

Edited by zebra
Thats not a bad curve, Id still want mine to come on at around 3500 as I've got stock rods and dont wanna rev past 7k rpm (my limiter is at 6900 atm) But then again im not chasing as much power as what you've got, and ive noticed that yours noses over at 7000. I want a 'more tractable' street engine i guess you could say

It's all personal choice but would be using the .82 A/R rear housing.

Thats not a bad curve, Id still want mine to come on at around 3500 as I've got stock rods and dont wanna rev past 7k rpm (my limiter is at 6900 atm) But then again im not chasing as much power as what you've got, and ive noticed that yours noses over at 7000. I want a 'more tractable' street engine i guess you could say

Thats on a stock bottom end :D It now hasn't been tuned for 18 months, so I am thinking its about time for a tune

yeah i tihnk im going to go with the bigger exhaust housing, rb25's are tough and with a good tune should be able to handle 300rwkw, have a mate with a to4z on a stock rb25 and its been running fine for almost a year now, puts out 340rwkw i think.

is there any people who have experienced the 0.63 housing??

Edited by scarface
Thats not a bad curve, Id still want mine to come on at around 3500 as I've got stock rods and dont wanna rev past 7k rpm (my limiter is at 6900 atm) But then again im not chasing as much power as what you've got, and ive noticed that yours noses over at 7000. I want a 'more tractable' street engine i guess you could say

Then buy a HKS GTRS :)

post-1811-1190886352_thumb.jpg post-1811-1190886393_thumb.jpg

PS: Tomei Poncams. Head porting, std bottom end.

With a std motor, the turbo may come on boost a fraction earlier but make a little less power in the mid and high range: Expect peak at 250rwkw, as an estimation.

PPS: Ignore the RED line, tested a different exhaust

this thread isn't to bad if your interested in getting an idea on power outputs from gt35 turbos

http://www.calaisturbo.com.au/showthread.p...;highlight=gt35

Not real a good indication considering the VL's have a 3.0ltr engine :)

yeah true, but they have a lower static compression ratio and sohc/smaller ports, so kind of puts them lineball at the end of the day.

the point i was getting at, is if your not planning to make that sort of power, why not run a smaller turbo or housing to reduce lag where possible. no use having extra lag if you only want to push it 50%

Al - When I said a more tractable street engine i meant around 20-30kw short of what HypeR33 has. I dont wanna go to the effort (re:cost) of changing cams where's the turbo ive chosen will give me 250rwkw easily on lowish boost and would (should) have a nice progressive torque curve. I just want a lazy engine which on low boost will pull cleanly to red line without being like a light switch or having everything down low and run out up top.

HKS Gt-RS turbos are great but in my opinion they are just too physically small for the RB25 - especially when you look through the RB25 Turbo Upgrade thread and guys with High-Flows Are getting better results than those with the GT28 sized HKS/Garret Turbos.

But Anyhoo i think ive hi jacked this thread enough :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • As somebody who works in the energy sector and lives in a subzero climate, i'm convinced EV's will never be the bulk of our transport.  EV battery and vehicle companies over here have been going bankrupt on a weekly basis the last year. 
    • With all the rust on those R32s, how can it even support all the extra weight requirements. Probably end up handling as well as a 1990s Ford Falcon Taxi.
    • Yes...but look at the numbers. There is a tiny tiny fraction of the number of Joules available, compared to what is used/needed. Just because things are "possible" doesn't make them meaningful.
    • Thanks for taking the time to post that ! If anything changes or happens please do update us. 
    • Somehow Vertimass/Oak Ridge National Labs has figured out a catalyst that can convert ethanol into C9-C10 hydrocarbons in basically a single step without ending up with a bunch of ethylene or similar waste products: https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2023224867A1/en I still don't think anything like this will keep us from needing to transition to EVs regardless along with all kinds of other electrification, but things like this will go a long way towards alleviating the problem of how to electrify things like planes. Renewable diesel is seemingly an easier problem as well, Chevron is already running refineries for the stuff and the primary feedstock is tallow and other waste fats from agriculture.
×
×
  • Create New...