Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

But the best thing about this one is it has one of Duncans attessa controllers, so I can make it very rear biased and hopefully be able to handle it!

Um.... actually it won't. The lowest setting on those controllers is "standard" and all other settings are just increases in FWD bias.

Sorry but the only way you are going to make it more RWD biased is to take the front shaft out or avoid accelerating hard in a straight line. :banana:

Anyways.... Go Saints.

  • Replies 705
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

street class - street tyres (>100 UTQG)

race class - semi slicks

I think the international "rules" are >140 UTQG. I don't think a blanket tyre rule is the best answer but it's certainly a lot simpler than some of the other ideas going round. Simple is best.

I agree that Russ should be left to come up with some rules and put them up. Not everyone will agree with them, but if he is putting in the effort to organise such a huge event then I think he should get final say and be respected for it.

I'm sure Russ values the opinions posted here but it is his series and I'm pretty sure he has a set of rules in mind which will be made available as soon as they are finalised. People then have a choice, run within the rules or don't run.

Just to throw a cat amongst the pigeons and get you all talking somemore, Redline Time Attacks 2007 Rules: http://www.redlinetimeattack.com/docs/2007...tackRulesV2.pdf

I think those rules look pretty reasonable, except perhaps considering the intended japanese focus of this event would mean that the widebody/overfender rule for street class wouldnt be too appropriate, considering there would be a fair number of purely street driven cars with overfenders or widebody conversions.

EDIT: Just read the modified class rules where widebodys etc *are* allowed.

I guess this would now more depend on whether 3 classes are needed/desired...

Also, just my personal opinion, I dont see why headlinings should be removable in street class.

Carpets are a bit iffy, but I guess justifiable considering some people do drive without carpet in their street car...

But really, removing roof linings would be moving a little bit too far away from street cars I believe.

I also think the no pro drivers for street class rule is a good idea

Edited by swanny180

Lets not forget that this is intend to be a SAFE time attack event. The intention is build your best car, try to have fun on the track and achieve the best optimal time (SAFELY). It's looks like the main sticky point here is tyre selection. Is there any reason why we could not have 3 simple and fair classes of shonky street tyres, semi slick and slick?

Personally, I don't care about a $50 trophy. I care about the racing spirit, my safety and being able to drive the car to the track without getting ping for using slick on the street. I will never put street tyres on my GTR cause it's just so unsafe and I will get kick off the track for drifting as well :banana:

So can we agree to disagree on the tyre aspects. What's next? Trims/panels/chassis modification?

If you're talking about the 'racing spirit' and it's being called a "time attack" event, then shouldn't there at least be some effort to align with the original Rev Speed event rules? I think the rule of no slicks, any tyre up to semi slicks is my suggestion. Most competitors will not run street rubber if they want good times, so having a street tyre class, and a semi slick class is a silly thing. Just make it any tyre people want to run, but they must have tread pattern. Done. Remember, it's about keeping it simple.

Just to throw a cat amongst the pigeons and get you all talking somemore, Redline Time Attacks 2007 Rules: http://www.redlinetimeattack.com/docs/2007...tackRulesV2.pdf

There is some dumbarse stuff in there;

- Sequential Gear Boxes Not Permitted in Street Class.

- Sequential Gear Boxes Not Permitted in Modified Class.

But sir, my car (35GTR, M3, M5, VW, Audi etc etc) comes standard with a sequential gearbox :)

- All Street Class vehicles must use DOT street tires with a UTQG tread wear rating of 140 or higher, Tires with UTQG tread wear rating under 140 are not permitted in Street Class

But sir, my car (35GTR, M3, M5, VW, Audi etc etc) comes standard with a tyre rated less than 140 :)

- All Modified Class vehicles are required to use DOT approved tires with UTQG tread wear ratings of 50 and above. Tires with less than a UTQG rating of 50 are not permitted in Modified Class.

No problem, Hoosier make a tyre that has a rating of 50 printed on it, but it's really a 30 :no:

- Front under tray cannot go rearward past the center-line of the front axle

But sir, my car comes standard with a front undertray that goes rearward past the centre line of the front axle :no:

And lastly;

- All vehicles must use tires that are legal for use on public roadways in the United States, Japan or the European Union.

What about us Ozzies? ;)

Merry Xmas

Gary

Lets not forget that this is intend to be a SAFE time attack event. The intention is build your best car, try to have fun on the track and achieve the best optimal time (SAFELY). It's looks like the main sticky point here is tyre selection. Is there any reason why we could not have 3 simple and fair classes of shonky street tyres, semi slick and slick?

Personally, I don't care about a $50 trophy. I care about the racing spirit, my safety and being able to drive the car to the track without getting ping for using slick on the street. I will never put street tyres on my GTR cause it's just so unsafe and I will get kick off the track for drifting as well ;)

So can we agree to disagree on the tyre aspects. What's next? Trims/panels/chassis modification?

only reason is that time attacks have street tyre and semi slick classes, and no full slicks. is there any reason it should be done different here?

there's nothing unsafe about using road tyres on a race track. but if you think you have too much power for them, then stay on your semi slicks and run in that class. no problem.

the point is its a much easier way to seperate the classes than trying to make your own rules based on levels of modifications. your case is a perfect example - a heavily modified car won't want to run on street tyres and therefore will be in the race/semi slick class. perfect. doesn't mean the street tyre class shouldn't be there for less modified cars. And if a heavily modified car were to run on street tyres, they'd probably struggle to beat much less modified cars that aren't overpowering their tyres, so they act as a bit of a 'leveller'.

if the classes are going to be based on mods, then using an established set of rules makes alot more sense than trying to come up with your own. either Duncan's (I think it was) suggestion of using Production and Improved Prod rules or the Rev Speed rules.

If you're talking about the 'racing spirit' and it's being called a "time attack" event, then shouldn't there at least be some effort to align with the original Rev Speed event rules? ...having a street tyre class, and a semi slick class is a silly thing.

isn't that how the original time attack rules are - street tyres and semi slicks?

isn't that how the original time attack rules are - street tyres and semi slicks?

Not sure how they group the classes/results, but I was referring to the rules not permitting full slicks. I still think the street tyres are a waste of time hehe ;)

Gary has some good points tho, whatever rules Russ comes up with should be relevant for Australia, and not include over-complicated restrictions..

Merry Xmas all!!

There is some dumbarse stuff in there;

- Sequential Gear Boxes Not Permitted in Street Class.

- Sequential Gear Boxes Not Permitted in Modified Class.

But sir, my car (35GTR, M3, M5, VW, Audi etc etc) comes standard with a sequential gearbox :laugh:

- All Street Class vehicles must use DOT street tires with a UTQG tread wear rating of 140 or higher, Tires with UTQG tread wear rating under 140 are not permitted in Street Class

But sir, my car (35GTR, M3, M5, VW, Audi etc etc) comes standard with a tyre rated less than 140 :nyaanyaa:

- All Modified Class vehicles are required to use DOT approved tires with UTQG tread wear ratings of 50 and above. Tires with less than a UTQG rating of 50 are not permitted in Modified Class.

No problem, Hoosier make a tyre that has a rating of 50 printed on it, but it's really a 30 :nyaanyaa:

- Front under tray cannot go rearward past the center-line of the front axle

But sir, my car comes standard with a front undertray that goes rearward past the centre line of the front axle :nyaanyaa:

And lastly;

- All vehicles must use tires that are legal for use on public roadways in the United States, Japan or the European Union.

What about us Ozzies? :)

Merry Xmas

Gary

that is pretty retarded. is this a cams rule list? of the top of my head 048 advans come with 60 treadware lol.

there's nothing unsafe about using road tyres on a race track. but if you think you have too much power for them, then stay on your semi slicks and run in that class. no problem.

I've tracked less powerful cars, my stock s2000 and C32AMG, with street tyres before. After a couple of laps the tyres got too soft and it's not much fun. The stability control on the Merc prevent the car from loosing control but the s2k is more than a handful to control. The attessa system on the GTR is a beauty. With twice the power output of the c32, it doesn't have significant stability problem with street tyres until the tyres get too hot. So, it really depends on the format of the time attack. If it's a 20 mins session, then I would hate to see accidents on the track because people run around on overheated street tyres just because they want to qualify for this class. Also by allowing people to run only street tyres, you are not bridging the gaps between modern cars with stability control and cars without any electronic stability control system

the point is its a much easier way to seperate the classes than trying to make your own rules based on levels of modifications. your case is a perfect example - a heavily modified car won't want to run on street tyres and therefore will be in the race/semi slick class. perfect. doesn't mean the street tyre class shouldn't be there for less modified cars. And if a heavily modified car were to run on street tyres, they'd probably struggle to beat much less modified cars that aren't overpowering their tyres, so they act as a bit of a 'leveller'.

The questions are do we want any leveller in a time attack event where we should be trying to get the best time we can achieve and what is stopping someone from winding down the boost and use street tyres?

What ever the classes will be, I will be keen to attend all of them if possible. I just hope that the rules will be simple without too many restriction. I will use all tyres; street, semi and slick; to see what is the best time I can achieve....just for the fun of it. As mentioned before, the winners will still be $100+g gtr and the extreme European exotica. Neither of which will be mine :(

Edited by 9krpm
hey duncan

what compound are the ao48's??

There are 3 "compounds" of A048, so called "soft", "medium" and "medium/hard", not all compounds are available in all sizes and to further complicate matters, Yokohama Australia (in their infinite wisdom) don't bring in all the available compounds and sizes. Consequently it woiuld be my understanding that Duncan has to race on "medium/hard". This season we changed one of the race team cars (not a Skyline) from 17" wheels to 16" so we could run the "mediums", result being 0.75 secs faster at OP. With no discernable difference in tyre life.

So if you are contemplating running A048's I strongly suggest that you check the sizes and compounds first, before you buy wheels (too late he said).

Happy New Year

Gary

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...