Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i have two 12" type r alpine subs that i am putting in the corners of my skyline, just wondering what size the boxes should be and also what thickness mdf i should use? also should the subs be facing each other? if not should i angle them towards the front of the car or the rear?

cheers Cameron

I know you can buy premoulded boxes for about $350 that fit into the rear passenger side corner of the boot but havent been able to find any for the right corner strangely enough. might be different for the r33 though so could be worth asking car audio places if they can source them. then again if you really want to make them yourself youll save a fair bit of $$$. would want to use atleast 10-12mm thick mdf and then fibreglass it for added strength.

yeah i had a look at some premoulded boxes but they are way too expensive, so im definatly going to make my own boxes and i want to have boot space left so i am putting them in the corners and i need to know the smallest box size for the alpine 12" type r subs, (i still want them to sound good). :dry:

Yeah dunno about the sizes. ive seen on some manufacturer websites they actually list it but i couldnt find it on the alpine website. maybe if you find a very similar specced model sub from a different website that lists the min box volume u could just go off that. or look on some car audio forums and people will probably know off the top of their heads. Fhrx on this forum might know. (he has a sticky at the top of the car audio section for installing door speakers) maybe just pm him or something. from the majority of his posts on this forum it looks like he would know or be able to find out easily.

  • 1 month later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Hey mate, i have found and its by no means a scientific fact and someone will probably tell me im wrong but... the Alpine type-Rs are suposed to have about 32litres or around 1.15cf or there abouts, regarding the sound though i think that having it this size it booms, really deep bass, but being a trance, electro type person i wanted mine to be as tighter sounding thump as possible so i made mine around 29litres or there abouts. Of course you will need to power your subs effectivly to get the best out of them. But you should choose the kind of sound you want

just my op :)

  • 2 months later...

old thread, but I was curious to see what the theoretical response calculated to.

I wish Alpine would publish the specs on their drivers, but I found the specs for the 12" SWR 1241D on this website:

http://www.thielesmall.com/database.asp

Vas =58 litres,

Qts= 0.43

Fs = 28Hz

building the box at 32 litres gives a theoretical Qtc of 0.72 and an F3 of 46Hz. If you weren't short on space this provides a very good response shape

post-33161-1203658262_thumb.jpg

if you're prepared to put up with a small amount of peaking at the expense of some transient response (still way better than a ported box) you can drop the box size to as low as 13 litres which gives a Qtc of 1.0 (as high as I would ever go) and an F3 of 51 Hz - so lose 6Hz of response, but a get little boost in bass so that the ear could never tell and have a much smaller box

post-33161-1203658624_thumb.jpg

cheers,

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...