Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

would these fit fine on a R32 GTST?

17x8 +25 front

17x9 +25 rear

ive searched and a few members run mid 30+ offsets on their skylines.

whats the lowest offset in a 8" & 9" rim i can fit under stock r32 gtst guards (flare/roll is ok) ?

i want it to sit as nice and flush as possible, dont want the rims sticking in looking like i got them from my local rim joint.

any pics if possible of similar size/offset on a r32 gtst.

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/187582-offset-question-for-r32-gtst/
Share on other sites

with a 235 tire u will be cutting it pretty close with just rolled guards on the rear depending on camber and ride height etc.

just to give u some idea:

17x9.5 +38 with 255 and -1.5 camber, lip will sit out another 7mm on the 17x9 +25

wheelun9.jpg

17x9 +30 with 235 and -1.5 camber, lip will sit out another 5mm on the 17x9 +25

dscn7724zd7.jpg

17x9.5 +30 with 255 and -0.5 camber, pretty much will sit where 17x9 +25 will, sat nicely but would have needed some pulling to fit the 255's under, should be able to slip some 235's under there with only a roll.

dscn7840rz4.jpg

17x9 +30 with 235 and -2 camber, 17x8+25 will sit in about 6mm or so, looked like they might have just touched the guard when they were unrolled and the suspension compressed enough, but not a massive issue if u have decent suspension and proper ride height.

car96ss9.jpg

thats about all the close up pictures of relavent fitment. about the closest to 17x8 +25 i can think of is some 17x8.5 +30's on the front with with 215's, no sign of scrubbing as ud expect, they sat basically level with his guards, maybe a few mm in.

i rekon ud be best of going something like a 17x9 +30/+20 combination, front will sit ok on close to stock gaurds, rears might need rolling and a bit of flaring at most. if u want to go 8" on the front id say around +15 is about as low as u can go without needing flaring, rear u can go probably max 17x9 +20 on rolled guards before u start scrubbing.

but it all depends, if uve got decent suspension at a decent height ull be able to get away with a fair bit more, im currently running 17x8.5 +15 at the front with just rolled guards, u can almost see the top of the tread just coming out of the guard and it looks like it would hit the guard pretty hard if the suspension ever compressed enough, but so far theres no sign of scrubbing what so ever, and that includes spirited hills driving with big bumps and track work.

thanks for the pics nisskid! they helped alot!!

i think ill stick with 17x9 + 20 all round :P might have to run a bit more camber upfront to fit these on rolled guards with out any scrapping etc.

C-red special atm with the SSR rims. might just get them 17x9 + 21 all round for $1500 delivered. bloody bargain.

Edited by whyte

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • From when I was looking at getting the 86 engineered for the turbo, the joint said to put in a few euro 5 or 6 cats, then tune the car on a nice clean E85 tune When I was looking at a turbo for the MX5, it was basically the same thing, a couple of cats and a nice clean tune Although, it will depend on the year of the Jeep IRT emmisions standards required, and what mods are done, especially if it has a newer engine installed that requires a higher Euro
    • Yeah - but it's not actually that easy. There are limits for HC, CO, NOx and particulates. Particulates shouldn't be a concern in any petrol engine unless trying to comply to the very latest Euro standard. But getting a tune right so that all the others stay within limits AT THE SAME TIME is not a trivial exercise. You couldn't possibly get it right by just guessing at the tuner's dyno, unless he had a 4 gas analyser up the pipe, which is not often the case these days. It used to be. Every decent shop that did "tune ups" (as opposed to tuning) would have a 4 gas analsyer. Perhaps there's still quite a few of them around these days. But most "tuners" are only watching O2 and power readings.
    • Slight segway but the most expensive part of the whole thing which I would have thought would only be required for an engine size/type swap, not a VIV test, is emissions testing.  That's when you get into the big bucks.  I can't remember the exact price now but I got quotes for the GT-R based on swapping to RB30 (not that anyone bothers doing it legally anymore...) and it was around $4500 just for that alone.  The guy that does them manipulates the tune on the vehicle to make sure it passes.  The cheaper option is to book into Kangan Batman Tafe (I think that's where it was) and hire their tester.  Allegedly you're not allowed in there with the car though so not in a position to tweak anything to make sure the vehicle passes.  I'm sure in this day and age of ultra tuneable ECU's you could get the tuner to program a special efficiency (clean) tune that emits the lowest amount of particulates possible that would pass the test.  It might only make 50kW's but as long as it passed who cares!
    • I'm sure he has left signs, or, he is looking down, laughing That's my cunning plan for when I leave, lots of half finished projects, with no rhyme or reason of where I was actually up to, just to keep everyone on their toes
    • Does that price include the rack time to straighten the frame and body and replacement of parts and paint, as well as the noise and emmisions testing  The last engineering certificate I had done, albeit about 15 years ago, was around $1000 for a few inspections and the certificate 
×
×
  • Create New...