Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thats why you guys should open a shop down here so us Melbourneites can reap the benifits of your know or can can employ me for a year or 2 to show me the rope and i'll open one up for you.

Can you guys recommend anyone down here thats any good?

Id only use Ben at Racepace if i lived down there.

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

cause we are already talking big singles on 26's

im interested to know thoughts on a Turbonetics T72 on a 26

The Turbonetics T72 has the same comp wheel but 72mm inducer as the Garrett GT4202R, HKS T51R and Billet 72, 74, and 76.

The Turbonetics will most likely be non ball bearing but if it is the ball bearing version it only has one ball bearing. They also have an old school TO4 Turbine.

Turbonetics do have a new line of turbo’s that use GT style turbines. They call them F1 turbines. I’m pretty sure the T72 is not apart of the new turbo’s. There new turbo’s are still only single ball bearing as well.

The Turbonetics T72 is not a bad turbo but the other turbo’s have more advanced turbines, bearings and housings.

awesome thanks for that, the motor im hopefully buying already has one strapped to it so just trying to get some ideas but it seems they are not very popular maby more in the states after googling it

the thing is the motor has not yet been run, but im guesing it will be good for a safe 600hp safely

Cool as so looks like I can just start bending over right abooouutt, now. If they know what they are doing over there I really don't mind paying the extra to get it done right the first time.

Thanks for the help boy and girls.

Hi all , I'm not sure if Garrett market a ball bearing version of the T51R except through HKS . This is way too much turbo for 400Kw IMO so I wouldn't burn too much time looking at them .

I think differently now about the single / twin turbo debate on RB26's mainly because of the cost and effort to change them .

Good reasons do exist for going the single route but I think they are competition related and real race cars usually have the budget to match . I'll be blunt here but at the same time this is not an attack on any one individual . Many single turbo manifolds are absolute garbage and people don't want to spend the money on those that really make the twin scroll single turbo work as well or better than the factory short branch manifolds and parallel twin turbos . Basically you gets given a choise with the 26 head , tear up 5-7 approx grand on the gun manifold/turbo/gates or fit appropriately sized aftermarket bolt on type RB 26 twins . Even at 2G each your going to be better off financially and it'll look sort of factory , no externals to try and convince the cops it just has big EGR valves ....

For the power you want it'll be easier for you if the cylinder head is modified properly and suitable cams fitted , the std head lacks breathing on the exhaust side and mildish cams help give them larger lungs . At least the RB26's six throttle inlet system helps takes the chaff cutter effect (reversion) out of longer period cams .

I look at it this way , I'd only want to have a GTR in bits once so it would be head off meaning you can get at the crowded TT side . I'd have the head ported and buy mild cams , smooth up the std manifolds and buy suitable turbos such as 2530's or equal . Good split dumps seem to make a worthwhile difference so buy them too . If its possible to simplify the factory plumbing and mike minor alterations to the fastening systems thats worth a look because GTR's are a bitch to work around on the turbo side . Then assemble and tune and be happy . I would not lose any sleep if it only got 385 Kw because the last kw/nm don't get used all that often . I believe having a usable power range is an exercise in sanity and far more practicle than having one high number .

I probably shouldn't ask but is there any particular reason for wanting 400 Kw ? I'd consider 300-350 plenty for a street car and I think you can get a far more usable power range with the headwork/cams/mild turbos such as GT-SS's or the Garrett marketed version . I think you can make a mildly modded GTR go better everywhere than a std one particularly at around town speeds and revs . Its the low to mid range punch that the earlier GTR's seem to lack and why I reckon I see so many "idled" around at 3500 revs and given the gas from there just to get some shove in the back . Its the legacy of being a heavy homologation special and having less capacity because of the turbo multiplication factor .

Your money , your call .

Cheers A .

You're kidding me, you guys need to open up a shop down here so we can get some of that going on.

I have been told by 2 performance shops down here that I will only get around 350awkw going with the setup above using the 2530's I already have.

Was there any head work done?

thats cause they (those shops) are probaly brain washed into thinking garrets and hks are the same..... housings differrences MAKE ALL THE DIFFERRENCE. i have never once been able to replicate results with generic garret housing when compared to the HKS equivalents.

As for 400rwkw you can do it with low mounts shit we get easy 380rwkw out of T517Z (std heads) all day everyday.

discopotato03 - Thanks for the big response, the reason I was wanting to go single and 400 All wheel KW (does anyone know if this is different to rwkw?) is because I already have 2530's and 290 All wheel KW. I was told that I would get around 50 awkw more for 7K with the same turbos or for the same price and go single I would hit the 400awkw mark.

I also want to run a 10 only because I am the only one out of about 15 mates with tough cars that has a turbo, the rest have V8's. I know I can drill them around corners but I want to beat them down the quarter as well. The quickest has run an 11.2 so I have to beat that.

In regards to turbos I am really interested in the Billet Turbos made by Mr. Turbo in Qld, they are a lot more advanced then the garret or the HKS brands. Check them out and let me know what you guys think.

So the 8K mark is where I am at with the budget 4k allocated for fitting and tuning the rest for parts (I get them wholesale so thats why its so low). Is this enough for labour or am I dreaming?

thats cause they (those shops) are probaly brain washed into thinking garrets and hks are the same..... housings differrences MAKE ALL THE DIFFERRENCE. i have never once been able to replicate results with generic garret housing when compared to the HKS equivalents.

Well 440rwkw out of the Garrett -5s is pretty good going i reckon (pump fuel) ;)

As good as, if not better than, the HKS items.

:(

As for running a 11.2 - you'll beat that with a 350rwkw GTR if you can drive.

Not a worry in the world!

\

Well 440rwkw out of the Garrett -5s is pretty good going i reckon (pump fuel) :thumbsup:

As good as, if not better than, the HKS items.

:D

As for running a 11.2 - you'll beat that with a 350rwkw GTR if you can drive.

Not a worry in the world!

Thats pretty damn good, but can anyone clarify the difference between all wheel kW and rear wheel kW?

If there is a difference, what is 285 all wheel kW in rear wheel kW?

Cheers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • All the schemas I can see, indicate your typical setup of ATF 'cooler' (read: heat exchanger) in the bottom radiator tank..ie; https://nissan.epc-data.com/stagea/wgnc34/5413-rb25det/engine/214/ ...but I can prattle on a bit here. These trannies have a thermistor in the sump ~ the TCU reads this and 1. bumps the line pressure up when the ATF is 'cold' and 2. prevents the TC lockup clutch from operating, until the ATF comes up to minimum operating temp (keeps the ATF 'churning' through the TC so it heats up quicker) -- trigger point is around 55C. In these conditions, the engine coolant temperature rises faster than the ATF temperature, and also helps heat the ATF up, which is why it's best to think of the in radiator tank setup as a heat exchanger ; the heat can flow in both directions... ...with these trannies, the 'hot' ATF comes out the front banjo bolt, flows through the cooler/heat exchanger, and returns to the box  via the rear banjo bolt. This gets a mention, due to the wildly different opinions wrt running auto trans fluid coolers ~ do you bypass the in radiator tank altogether, or put the cooler inline with the in radiator tank system...and then, do you put the additional cooler before of after the in radiator tank system?... ....fact is the nominal engine operating temp (roughly 75C), happens to be the ideal temperature for the ATF used in these trannies as well (no surprises there), so for the in radiator tank system to actually 'cool' the ATF, the ATF temp has to be hotter than that...lets say 100C -- you've got 25C of 'excess' heat, (slowly) pumping into the 75C coolant. This part of the equation changes drastically, when you've got 100C ATF flowing through an air cooled radiator ; you can move a lot more excess heat, faster ~ it is possible to cool the ATF 'too much' as it were...(climate matters a lot)... ...in an 'ideal' setup, what you're really trying to control here, is flash heating of the ATF, primarily produced by the TC interface. In a perfect world, wrt auto trans oil cooling, you want a dedicated trans cooler with builtin thermostatic valving - they exist. These should be run inline and before the in radiator tank system ~ when 'cold' the valving bypasses the fin stack, allowing the ATF to flow direct to the in radiator tank heat exchanger, so it works 'as intended' with helping heat the ATF up. When 'hot' (iirc it was 50C threshold), the valving shuts forcing the ATF through the cooler fin stack, and onto the in radiator tank heat exchanger...and you sort of think of it as a 'thermal conditioner' of sorts...ie; if you did cool your ATF down to 65C, the coolant will add a little heat, otherwise it works as intended... ...the 'hot' ATF coming from the front bango bolt, is instantiated from the TC when in use, so all/any flash heated oil, flows to the fluid-to-air cooler first, and because of the greater heat differential, you can get rid of this heat fast. Just how big (BTU/h) this cooler needs to be to effectively dissipate this TC flash heat, is the charm...too many variables to discuss here, but I just wanted to point out the nitty-gritty of automatic trans fluid coolers ~ they're a different beastie to what most ppl think of when considering an 'oil cooler'... /3.5cents   
    • Been a busy but productive day. Axle and hubs acquired. All fitted up after a bit of modifying. Need to sort out wider mudguards and running light reflector covers but other than that the trailer is gooood to go !!
    • Selling a SMIC for a Nissan Stagea C34 Series 2 and the pipe from the intercooler to inlet. (I believe it is the same R34 GTT, please correct me if I'm wrong) Price: $50? I dont have a photo of the big black pipe that goes from SMIC outlet to throttle body.
    • So the original radiator is leaking now. Looking at getting a fully aluminium one next. Am I correct in saying that the Series 2 Auto Stageas have a separate trans cooler from factory (located in between the rad and intercooler in my previous post/message).   Currently looking at Fenix $460, Blitz $700, GReddy $800, and KoyoRad $740. What are everyones thought on Fenix ( ive read a few comments saying theyre cheap Chinese rebrands etc and how their build quality is... well.. chinese...)  compared to the others? Worth the extra couple hundies?
×
×
  • Create New...