Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thats why you guys should open a shop down here so us Melbourneites can reap the benifits of your know or can can employ me for a year or 2 to show me the rope and i'll open one up for you.

Can you guys recommend anyone down here thats any good?

Id only use Ben at Racepace if i lived down there.

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

cause we are already talking big singles on 26's

im interested to know thoughts on a Turbonetics T72 on a 26

The Turbonetics T72 has the same comp wheel but 72mm inducer as the Garrett GT4202R, HKS T51R and Billet 72, 74, and 76.

The Turbonetics will most likely be non ball bearing but if it is the ball bearing version it only has one ball bearing. They also have an old school TO4 Turbine.

Turbonetics do have a new line of turbo’s that use GT style turbines. They call them F1 turbines. I’m pretty sure the T72 is not apart of the new turbo’s. There new turbo’s are still only single ball bearing as well.

The Turbonetics T72 is not a bad turbo but the other turbo’s have more advanced turbines, bearings and housings.

awesome thanks for that, the motor im hopefully buying already has one strapped to it so just trying to get some ideas but it seems they are not very popular maby more in the states after googling it

the thing is the motor has not yet been run, but im guesing it will be good for a safe 600hp safely

Cool as so looks like I can just start bending over right abooouutt, now. If they know what they are doing over there I really don't mind paying the extra to get it done right the first time.

Thanks for the help boy and girls.

Hi all , I'm not sure if Garrett market a ball bearing version of the T51R except through HKS . This is way too much turbo for 400Kw IMO so I wouldn't burn too much time looking at them .

I think differently now about the single / twin turbo debate on RB26's mainly because of the cost and effort to change them .

Good reasons do exist for going the single route but I think they are competition related and real race cars usually have the budget to match . I'll be blunt here but at the same time this is not an attack on any one individual . Many single turbo manifolds are absolute garbage and people don't want to spend the money on those that really make the twin scroll single turbo work as well or better than the factory short branch manifolds and parallel twin turbos . Basically you gets given a choise with the 26 head , tear up 5-7 approx grand on the gun manifold/turbo/gates or fit appropriately sized aftermarket bolt on type RB 26 twins . Even at 2G each your going to be better off financially and it'll look sort of factory , no externals to try and convince the cops it just has big EGR valves ....

For the power you want it'll be easier for you if the cylinder head is modified properly and suitable cams fitted , the std head lacks breathing on the exhaust side and mildish cams help give them larger lungs . At least the RB26's six throttle inlet system helps takes the chaff cutter effect (reversion) out of longer period cams .

I look at it this way , I'd only want to have a GTR in bits once so it would be head off meaning you can get at the crowded TT side . I'd have the head ported and buy mild cams , smooth up the std manifolds and buy suitable turbos such as 2530's or equal . Good split dumps seem to make a worthwhile difference so buy them too . If its possible to simplify the factory plumbing and mike minor alterations to the fastening systems thats worth a look because GTR's are a bitch to work around on the turbo side . Then assemble and tune and be happy . I would not lose any sleep if it only got 385 Kw because the last kw/nm don't get used all that often . I believe having a usable power range is an exercise in sanity and far more practicle than having one high number .

I probably shouldn't ask but is there any particular reason for wanting 400 Kw ? I'd consider 300-350 plenty for a street car and I think you can get a far more usable power range with the headwork/cams/mild turbos such as GT-SS's or the Garrett marketed version . I think you can make a mildly modded GTR go better everywhere than a std one particularly at around town speeds and revs . Its the low to mid range punch that the earlier GTR's seem to lack and why I reckon I see so many "idled" around at 3500 revs and given the gas from there just to get some shove in the back . Its the legacy of being a heavy homologation special and having less capacity because of the turbo multiplication factor .

Your money , your call .

Cheers A .

You're kidding me, you guys need to open up a shop down here so we can get some of that going on.

I have been told by 2 performance shops down here that I will only get around 350awkw going with the setup above using the 2530's I already have.

Was there any head work done?

thats cause they (those shops) are probaly brain washed into thinking garrets and hks are the same..... housings differrences MAKE ALL THE DIFFERRENCE. i have never once been able to replicate results with generic garret housing when compared to the HKS equivalents.

As for 400rwkw you can do it with low mounts shit we get easy 380rwkw out of T517Z (std heads) all day everyday.

discopotato03 - Thanks for the big response, the reason I was wanting to go single and 400 All wheel KW (does anyone know if this is different to rwkw?) is because I already have 2530's and 290 All wheel KW. I was told that I would get around 50 awkw more for 7K with the same turbos or for the same price and go single I would hit the 400awkw mark.

I also want to run a 10 only because I am the only one out of about 15 mates with tough cars that has a turbo, the rest have V8's. I know I can drill them around corners but I want to beat them down the quarter as well. The quickest has run an 11.2 so I have to beat that.

In regards to turbos I am really interested in the Billet Turbos made by Mr. Turbo in Qld, they are a lot more advanced then the garret or the HKS brands. Check them out and let me know what you guys think.

So the 8K mark is where I am at with the budget 4k allocated for fitting and tuning the rest for parts (I get them wholesale so thats why its so low). Is this enough for labour or am I dreaming?

thats cause they (those shops) are probaly brain washed into thinking garrets and hks are the same..... housings differrences MAKE ALL THE DIFFERRENCE. i have never once been able to replicate results with generic garret housing when compared to the HKS equivalents.

Well 440rwkw out of the Garrett -5s is pretty good going i reckon (pump fuel) ;)

As good as, if not better than, the HKS items.

:(

As for running a 11.2 - you'll beat that with a 350rwkw GTR if you can drive.

Not a worry in the world!

\

Well 440rwkw out of the Garrett -5s is pretty good going i reckon (pump fuel) :thumbsup:

As good as, if not better than, the HKS items.

:D

As for running a 11.2 - you'll beat that with a 350rwkw GTR if you can drive.

Not a worry in the world!

Thats pretty damn good, but can anyone clarify the difference between all wheel kW and rear wheel kW?

If there is a difference, what is 285 all wheel kW in rear wheel kW?

Cheers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
    • Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
    • While it is a very nice idea to put card style AFMs into the charge pipe (post intercooler, obviously), the position of the AFM and the recirc valve relative to each other starts to become something that you really have to consider. The situation: The stock AFM is located upstream the turbo, and the recirc valve return is located between the AFM and the turbo inlet, aimed at the turbo inlet, so that it flows away from and not through the AFM. Thus, once metered air is not metered again, neither flowing forwards, or backwards, when vented out of the charge pipe. When you put the AFM between the turbo outlet and the TB, there is a volume of pressurised charge pipe upstream of the AFM and there is a volume of pressurised pipe downstream of the AFM. When the recirc valve opens and vents the charge pipe, air is going to flow from both ends of the charge pipe towards the recirc valve. If the recirc valve is in the stock location, then the section between it and the TB doesn't really matter here - you're not going to try to put the AFM in that piece of pipe. But the AFM will likely be somewhere between the intercooler and the recirc valve, So the entire charge pipe volume from that position (upstream of the AFM, back through the intercooler, to the turbo outlet) is going to flow through the AFM, get registered as combustion air, cause the ECU to fuel for it, but get dumped out of the recirc valve and you will end up with a typical BOV related rich spike. So ideally you want to put the AFM as close to the TB as possible (so, just upstream of the crossover pipe, assuming that the stock crossover is still in use, or, just before the TB if an FFP is being used) and locate the recirc valve at the turbo outlet. Recirc valve at the turbo outlet is the new normal for things like EFRs anyway. In the even of a recirc valve opening dumping all the air in the charge pipe, pretty much all of it is going to go backwards, from the TB to the recirc valve near the turbo outlet. But only a small portion of it (that between the TB and the AFM) will pass through the AFM, and it will pass through going backwards. The card style AFMs are somewhat more immune to reading flow that passes through them in reverse than older AFMs are, so you should absolutely minimise the rich pulse behaviour associated with the unavoidable outcome of having both a recirc valve and an AFM in the charge pipe.
    • Yep, in my case as soon as I started hearing weird noises I backed off the tension until it sounded normal again. Delicate balance between enough tension to avoid that cold start slip and too much damaging things.
×
×
  • Create New...