Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 285
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

the first guy who got one... and possibly have a radiator fetish that i just found out about wrote this about them

"Yep, and all going well it will have it's first track test this weekend. The car was running mid/high 90 degree temps on the track previously. I am hoping to see low 90's, hot enough to keep the oil clean and cool enough to keep me happy.

Some specs on the core. They are twin core not triple, but the cores are about 10mm wider each so the same effect as three rows (maybe better, less space is wasted between rows) The fin pitch is about the same as the stock core but the tube pitch is finer. There are ten extra tubes per row.

So the tubes are about 50% bigger between the two rows as the stock core and there are 25% more tubes. They should be a significant boost in cooling."

it has mounting holes for the shroud

untill i trial fit one i cant confirm 100% but the supplier says it does

mine have all been custom fit

Oh ok thanks for that.

Let me know when you have a definite answer, as I would be keen on one as long as it sits exactly like stock radiator. :w00t:

Thanks,

Abu

ok for starters they are only 45mm thick, not 50mm. the top tanks are 50mm but the core is 45mm.

The R32 and s13 (CA only) are only 32mm thick

All radiators suit gtr and gtst models accordingly

And there is absolutley no way you cant be making money off these, we are the SA distributor for these radiators. We have them in stock too for adelaide customers and if you wanted to check quality and they wont dissapoint

I just though you should get your facts straight.

hey pete ur mate got one that will fit r31 with rb20? i havent been able 2 get any answers off anyone about which will fit but im assuming r32 one would b close?

for a r31, you use a r33 radiator

as for exact dimensions and stuff all i know is they are 50mm thick and twin core, i will measure one i have tonight so i can get my facts straight

lol

i dont make any money out of these...

anyway they are a good thing if you want one come and get them

pete

So for S13, can you get one that is the 50mm core and fits SR20det?

give us a pm. cheers mate i'll get one asap if it is :D

Edited by chunda

Bought one yesterday. They look perty. The core itself is 15mm wider than stock and everything else is bigger ie:end tanks. So about a 60% increace in water capacity over the stock radiator.

Will have a report to give on day to day driving in 1-2wks. Track report a bit later on.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
    • But I think you missed mine.. there is also nothing about the 98 spec that supports your claim..  according to the fuel standards, it can be identical to 95, just very slightly higher octane number. But the ulp vs pulp fuel regulations go show 95 (or 98), is not just 91 with some additives. any claim of ‘refined by the better refineries’ or ‘higher quality fuel’ is just hearsay.  I have never seen anything to back up such claims other than ‘my mate used to work for a fuel station’, or ‘drove a fuel delivery truck’, or ‘my mechanic says’.. the actual energy densities do slightly vary between the 3 grades of fuel, but the difference is very minor. That said, I am very happy to be proven wrong if anyone has some hard evidence..
×
×
  • Create New...