Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys i just got done for driving a high powered vehicle and i lost 3 points...i was on a 1 point for 12 month condition before that so now im stuffed.

a mate of mine told me that i will be ok if i go to court coz i have had my licence since september last year and that this law (3points) should not apply to me coz i had the car and my licence from before july 1st.is this true or am i gonna be stuffed? thanks guys

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/187966-high-powered-vehicle/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Your stuffed, you'll loose your license for 6 months as you broke the probation, or is it 12 months?

One or the other either way.

R33 GTS-t's were illegal to drive since BEFORE July 1. Regardless of when you got your license.

There was just no real penalty (minor fine, no demerits).

Where now there is a reasonable fine, 3 Demerits... coupled with 5-points in 12 months for P-Platers, driving a car illegally actually isnt viable anymore, nor worth the risk.

In all honesty, this has been covered in that much detail on this website, and by the Gov't. If you didnt know the law then its really a case of tough titties

Look at the bright side, time to purchase a bicycle and get fit for summer.

And if your still 1-2years from full license, sell the car too

As Ash (R31Nismoid) has stated; The "power to weight" law has been around for 15yrs, just wasn't really enforced due to the laughable penalties, now they have corrected that. A quick search of the VIC forum will find threads explaining these rules and also links to the VICroads website.

Save your money as the judge will not change a thing. Don't listen to mates, as they will say what you want to hear, especially when they don't have a clue :thumbsup:

Wow the laws been in place for a while now and you're the first person that I've heard of that's been caught. Did you get the $1100 fine by any chance? Or was that after you got caught a couple of times.

Dunno about "reasonable law"... maybe the huge fine is reasonable.. the points aren't.. 3 points is BS, especially if, like me it's hard to find realistic power and weight figures and your car isn't on the list.. I'm not risking it.. 3 weeks till i can drive it and the gtr ._.

It does not need to be on "the list". The law clearly states the P-to-W calculations.

And certainly a GTR is over-powered.

You go by the factory power/weight specifications of the factory vehicle.

Its really not hard to work out power-to-weight ratio's.

Personally i think its good, as i drove over-powered cars on my P's because the laws were a joke.

And realistically i shouldn't have been driving it.

Now the laws are tougher, i wouldnt even think about temping it when i could loose my license in a blink of an eye for it

Wow the laws been in place for a while now and you're the first person that I've heard of that's been caught. Did you get the $1100 fine by any chance? Or was that after you got caught a couple of times.

friend at work got caught....3 points and around $230 fine i think

i heard that the weight they (cops) use in calculating p2w was the unladen weight of the car - ie the car w/o any fuel, oil and other consumables. is this different to the factory quoted specs and if so does any one know where to find them?

It does not need to be on "the list". The law clearly states the P-to-W calculations.

And certainly a GTR is over-powered.

You go by the factory power/weight specifications of the factory vehicle.

Its really not hard to work out power-to-weight ratio's.

Personally i think its good, as i drove over-powered cars on my P's because the laws were a joke.

And realistically i shouldn't have been driving it.

Now the laws are tougher, i wouldnt even think about temping it when i could loose my license in a blink of an eye for it

Oh sorry, wasn't talking about my GTR, forgot i removed my avatar :thumbsup:

my valiant has the standard 318, 5.2 litre fireball and the tare on the sticker is like 1250 whereas actual weight is more like 1450 (my gtr has 1250 on it too.. i wish^^) and i have seen power figures for the val stating from 220-260hp (even workshop manuals list differently)so it sucks! am too scared to take chances now with this ghey 3 demerit points law.. gogogo nov 5th

Edited by GTAAAH

i don't care if this was a 'high powered car' or not, but these laws are designed to protect young, stupid drivers. I was one, once.

you get caught, too bad. it may prevent this:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/t187883.html

It does not need to be on "the list". The law clearly states the P-to-W calculations.

http://www.arrivealive.vic.gov.au/c_youngGLS_9b.html

as you can see the cops dont use any magical weight calcs its all here... and yes it is unladen weight

that took around 38 seconds to find from the VIC Roads site

what if you play dumb and tell em you didn't know?

they can't expect EVERYONE to be aware of these laws just coz they drive a r33

Playing dumb wont work.

R33's have been illegal to drive since the P-to-W laws were brought in. They have been around as long as ive been driving.

So they have at least been around since the 1990's.

The onus is on the driver/owner to ensure the car is legal to drive for their license grade, and in a roadworthy state at all times.

friend at work got caught....3 points and around $230 fine i think

Looks like they work their way up with the fines. $230 at first, but then if you don't listen they'll eventually make it $1100.

As much as I hate these laws, I accept it. They're here to protect us.

what if you play dumb and tell em you didn't know?

they can't expect EVERYONE to be aware of these laws just coz they drive a r33

The onus is on the driver to know what they can and can't drive. Everyone knows that P Platers have some sort of restriction, it is even written on the back of every rego label I have had! If that isnt enough to spur people into researching what car they can drive on their P's, I don't know what is.

http://www.arrivealive.vic.gov.au/c_youngGLS_9b.html

as you can see the cops dont use any magical weight calcs its all here... and yes it is unladen weight

that took around 38 seconds to find from the VIC Roads site

guys i knew bout that website and i am aware of the laws.

what i wanted to know was what exactly is that magic number of the unladen weight? there are a huge number of sources from which to choose. unfortunatelynot all of these sources agree. the difference in the quoted figures may mean the difference between a car being seen to be illegal or not.

also who's to say that the figures that the govt use come from the same source as one we might use? and who can argue that their values are accurate? i mean look at rego stickers. i just rekon it'd be a hell of a lot easier if the police and vicroads were 1) in agreement bout the implementation and interpretation of the laws and 2) if the same limits, guidelines or figures they use were defined and availabe to the public.

imo it'd lead to better acceptance of the restrictions. cos right now, while i agree that there is a benefit in the law, it seems vicpol especially are keeping us in the dark as another avenue of revenue raising. i know thats prolly not the case but its the impression i get.

/2c

If you reckon they are wrong, take them to court.

You'll soon find out whos facts are better than the others.

As manufacturer spec is what the weight goes by, and that comes from Nissan. There is really no ambiguity there

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey y'all! I'm curious about how y'all go about widebodying your cars. I noticed that when running a square setup, my front wheels are a bit more tucked in than my rear wheels. Not by much, maybe 5-10mm. This leads me to wonder - when I widebody, should I use narrower front flares and wider rear flares? I found a set of 40mm rear flares that I really like, and was thinking of pairing them with some 18mm front flares, but I don't want the car to look strange. How have others done this? Note, I'm in a sedan. Thanks!
    • And if it was anything other than an auto tranny part, it might be a problem. But seeing as all auto trannies belong in the recycling bin, it's fine.
    • I have an R32 Fenix rad. It is good.
    • All the schemas I can see, indicate your typical setup of ATF 'cooler' (read: heat exchanger) in the bottom radiator tank..ie; https://nissan.epc-data.com/stagea/wgnc34/5413-rb25det/engine/214/ ...but I can prattle on a bit here. These trannies have a thermistor in the sump ~ the TCU reads this and 1. bumps the line pressure up when the ATF is 'cold' and 2. prevents the TC lockup clutch from operating, until the ATF comes up to minimum operating temp (keeps the ATF 'churning' through the TC so it heats up quicker) -- trigger point is around 55C. In these conditions, the engine coolant temperature rises faster than the ATF temperature, and also helps heat the ATF up, which is why it's best to think of the in radiator tank setup as a heat exchanger ; the heat can flow in both directions... ...with these trannies, the 'hot' ATF comes out the front banjo bolt, flows through the cooler/heat exchanger, and returns to the box  via the rear banjo bolt. This gets a mention, due to the wildly different opinions wrt running auto trans fluid coolers ~ do you bypass the in radiator tank altogether, or put the cooler inline with the in radiator tank system...and then, do you put the additional cooler before of after the in radiator tank system?... ....fact is the nominal engine operating temp (roughly 75C), happens to be the ideal temperature for the ATF used in these trannies as well (no surprises there), so for the in radiator tank system to actually 'cool' the ATF, the ATF temp has to be hotter than that...lets say 100C -- you've got 25C of 'excess' heat, (slowly) pumping into the 75C coolant. This part of the equation changes drastically, when you've got 100C ATF flowing through an air cooled radiator ; you can move a lot more excess heat, faster ~ it is possible to cool the ATF 'too much' as it were...(climate matters a lot)... ...in an 'ideal' setup, what you're really trying to control here, is flash heating of the ATF, primarily produced by the TC interface. In a perfect world, wrt auto trans oil cooling, you want a dedicated trans cooler with builtin thermostatic valving - they exist. These should be run inline and before the in radiator tank system ~ when 'cold' the valving bypasses the fin stack, allowing the ATF to flow direct to the in radiator tank heat exchanger, so it works 'as intended' with helping heat the ATF up. When 'hot' (iirc it was 50C threshold), the valving shuts forcing the ATF through the cooler fin stack, and onto the in radiator tank heat exchanger...and you sort of think of it as a 'thermal conditioner' of sorts...ie; if you did cool your ATF down to 65C, the coolant will add a little heat, otherwise it works as intended... ...the 'hot' ATF coming from the front bango bolt, is instantiated from the TC when in use, so all/any flash heated oil, flows to the fluid-to-air cooler first, and because of the greater heat differential, you can get rid of this heat fast. Just how big (BTU/h) this cooler needs to be to effectively dissipate this TC flash heat, is the charm...too many variables to discuss here, but I just wanted to point out the nitty-gritty of automatic trans fluid coolers ~ they're a different beastie to what most ppl think of when considering an 'oil cooler'... /3.5cents   
    • Been a busy but productive day. Axle and hubs acquired. All fitted up after a bit of modifying. Need to sort out wider mudguards and running light reflector covers but other than that the trailer is gooood to go !!
×
×
  • Create New...