Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys I’m really desperate to sell my gtr. Just recently got married and also need to put some money towards a house. I’m more than willing to swap and some money my way or just sell, if I were to swap I would prefer non Japanese import. Has been regularly serviced, every 5,000k's sometimes earlier than the service time as well. car has had full major service when it landed in Melbourne, the car had been worked on by a work shop called hokue racing factory in Japan and the bottom end has some aftermarket internals which I’m not sure of, but all the work in Melbourne has been done by Benny kashima from hi torque performance in Dandenong. Car has all receipts of work done to it, only used the best oils, I’m willing to negotiate on price as well. PRICE: $23,500

33 N1 engine

jun cam gears

hks cam shafts

jun valve springs

garret 25/60r turbos

apexi power fc

greddy profec b boost controller with hi and low boost settings.

Turbo timer.

Half cage in the car, black colour.

Rebuilt 33 gtr gear box.

hks triple plate clutch.

short shifter.

apexi air pods

hks intercooler.

trust boost and oil pressure gauge

fujitsibo exhaust, quieter than stock.

sard 660cc injectors.

bosch 040 in tank fuel pump

apexi n1 coil overs

trust brake pads.

slotted rear rotors and cross drilled front rotors

Apexi sway bars and strut brace

aero vented bonnet with bonnet pins

hks kansai front lip.

$2,000 stereo alpine sound system which is still in the box, I have not yet fitted.

rims, not sure which ones.

ATS two way lsd front and rear.

On hi boost 18psi the car produces 350rwkw and still has more in it. I have all the dyno sheets and receipts of work on car as well. My low boost setting is 14 psi for the street and produces 282rwkw. The cams are yet to be dialled in so the car can make whole lot more power as well, I will also throw in a free set of OS GIKEN cam gears. Perfect for circuit racing and drag racing, car is very responsive; boost comes on at 1,800rpm. Car ran a flat 12 sec at 115mph on my old standard set up, with standard turbos, no injectors and no power fc, so the car is ready to run deep into the 11's. I only have one pic of the car so I will post that up. Please don’t hesitate to call, desperate to sell so I won’t refuse any sort of reasonable offer. My number is 0419 326 708, I can be email on [email protected] . thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/188059-modded-32gtr-for-sale-melbourne/
Share on other sites

just managed to attach this one, will try and take some more and will try and post up. come on guys, im desperate to sell this caar, i need the money, feel free to come and see the car when u want.

post-17267-1191640312_thumb.jpg

post-17267-1191917032_thumb.jpg

Edited by Bobbygill
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

sent you a pm or email a while back (cant remember)

am genuinely interested and have the coin but need a little more info as outlined in email to justify a flight down to melbourne

Richard

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • First up, I wouldn't use PID straight up for boost control. There's also other control techniques that can be implemented. And as I said, and you keep missing the point. It's not the ONE thing, it's the wrapping it up together with everything else in the one system that starts to unravel the problem. It's why there are people who can work in a certain field as a generalist, IE a IT person, and then there are specialists. IE, an SQL database specialist. Sure the IT person can build and run a database, and it'll work, however theyll likely never be as good as a specialist.   So, as said, it's not as simple as you're thinking. And yes, there's a limit to the number of everything's in MCUs, and they run out far to freaking fast when you're designing a complex system, which means you have to make compromises. Add to that, you'll have a limited team working on it, so fixing / tweaking some features means some features are a higher priority than others. Add to that, someone might fix a problem around a certain unrelated feature, and that change due to other complexities in the system design, can now cause a new, unforseen bug in something else.   The whole thing is, as said, sometimes split systems can work as good, and if not better. Plus when there's no need to spend $4k on an all in one solution, to meet the needs of a $200 system, maybe don't just spout off things others have said / you've read. There's a lot of misinformation on the internet, including in translated service manuals, and data sheets. Going and doing, so that you know, is better than stating something you read. Stating something that has been read, is about as useful as an engineering graduate, as all they know is what they've read. And trust me, nearly every engineering graduate is useless in the real world. And add to that, if you don't know this stuff, and just have an opinion, maybe accept what people with experience are telling you as information, and don't keep reciting the exact same thing over and over in response.
    • How complicated is PID boost control? To me it really doesn't seem that difficult. I'm not disputing the core assertion (specialization can be better than general purpose solutions), I'm just saying we're 30+ years removed from the days when transistor budgets were in the thousands and we had to hem and haw about whether there's enough ECC DRAM or enough clock cycles or the interrupt handler can respond fast enough to handle another task. I really struggle to see how a Greddy Profec or an HKS EVC7 or whatever else is somehow a far superior solution to what you get in a Haltech Nexus/Elite ECU. I don't see OEMs spending time on dedicated boost control modules in any car I've ever touched. Is there value to separating out a motor controller or engine controller vs an infotainment module? Of course, those are two completely different tasks with highly divergent requirements. The reason why I cite data sheets, service manuals, etc is because as you have clearly suggested I don't know what I'm doing, can't learn how to do anything correctly, and have never actually done anything myself. So when I do offer advice to people I like to use sources that are not just based off of taking my word for it and can be independently verified by others so it's not just my misinterpretation of a primary source.
    • That's awesome, well done! Love all these older Datsun / Nissans so rare now
    • As I said, there's trade offs to jamming EVERYTHING in. Timing, resources etc, being the huge ones. Calling out the factory ECU has nothing to do with it, as it doesn't do any form of fancy boost control. It's all open loop boost control. You mention the Haltech Nexus, that's effectively two separate devices jammed into one box. What you quote about it, is proof for that. So now you've lost flexibility as a product too...   A product designed to do one thing really well, will always beat other products doing multiple things. Also, I wouldn't knock COTS stuff, you'd be surprised how many things are using it, that you're probably totally in love with As for the SpaceX comment that we're working directly with them, it's about the type of stuff we're doing. We're doing design work, and breaking world firsts. If you can't understand that I have real world hands on experience, including in very modern tech, and actually understand this stuff, then to avoid useless debates where you just won't accept fact and experience, from here on, it seems you'd be be happy I (and possibly anyone with knowledge really) not reply to your questions, or input, no matter how much help you could be given to help you, or let you learn. It seems you're happy reading your data sheets, factory service manuals, and only want people to reinforce your thoughts and points of view. 
    • I don't really understand because clearly it's possible. The factory ECU is running on like a 4 MHz 16-bit processor. Modern GDI ECUs have like 200 MHz superscalar cores with floating point units too. The Haltech Nexus has two 240 MHz CPU cores. The Elite 2500 is a single 80 MHz core. Surely 20x the compute means adding some PID boost control logic isn't that complicated. I'm not saying clock speed is everything, but the requirements to add boost control to a port injection 6 cylinder ECU are really not that difficult. More I/O, more interrupt handlers, more working memory, etc isn't that crazy to figure out. SpaceX if anything shows just how far you can get arguably doing things the "wrong" way, ie x86 COTS running C++ on Linux. That is about as far away from the "correct" architecture as it gets for a real time system, but it works anyways. 
×
×
  • Create New...