Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just about to purchase my 1st set of Rays and was calculating sizes and offsets with a buddy from Musecret.

we calculated for the rears there would be a total for 127mm of dish and the fronts 87mm. with offsets of +15 and + 8 respectively

he also mentioned they were type B (something to do with the amount of dish and break clearance)

he also mentioned that having smaller offsets puts more strain on the car and results in lower handling, performance ect ect

was quite surprised but some how it makes sense.

was wondering if anyone could shed some light on the topic.

oh also do u guys rkn the dish is to much?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/188265-offsett-affect-performance/
Share on other sites

Type A, B, etc mainly refers to the face of the wheel and sometimes spoke curvature/dish, where certain types are designed to clear big brakes, while others arent.

A lower offset putting more strain on the car doesnt make any sense. Perhaps more strain on the wheel itself if the offset is something mad like -20.

The way I see it, the only way a lower offset can affect performance is that the wheels sit further outwards, giving the car a wider base, making it more stable, sorta.

On a side note, for those offsets you're gonna need guard work or some massive camber.

Edited by Yawn
A lower offset putting more strain on the car doesnt make any sense. Perhaps more strain on the wheel itself if the offset is something mad like -20.

The way I see it, the only way a lower offset can affect performance is that the wheels sit further outwards, giving the car a wider base, making it more stable, sorta.

not true. basically the further out from the hub the wheel centreline is the more strain is put on the hubs, suspension and most of all the wheel bearings.

I agree with BB, lower offset, means widening the track width = changing the center of gravity of your car and hence putting additional strain on suspension parts eg bushes etc....

That said, there is an optimal range of offsets which will be bugger all impact on the above...+8 might be pushing it or anything with a -ve offset...

not true. basically the further out from the hub the wheel centreline is the more strain is put on the hubs, suspension and most of all the wheel bearings.

True, makes sense :)

Is it a noticeable strain though? Like handling affected, suspension components failing more frequently, etc.? Or more of a theoretical strain?

Edited by Yawn
not true. basically the further out from the hub the wheel centreline is the more strain is put on the hubs, suspension and most of all the wheel bearings.

thats what i was worried about......with those specs do u think i would be risking serious damage or anything? i have plans of 300+rwkw.....so im a little worried about low offsets doing some dmg

How wide are these wheels with the +15 and +8 offsets?

19x11 on the rears and 19x9 on the fronts

True, makes sense :)

Is it a noticeable strain though? Like handling affected, suspension components failing more frequently, etc.? Or more of a theoretical strain?

would like to know this aswell. im getting a suspension kit from sydneykid to better the handling.....i hope having these wheels wont make it worse off

Edited by R34NRG

most notable stress would be on wheel bearings IMO. bigger offset = wider track. wider track means the car *should* be more stable through corners, cant really see any drawbacks in relation to handling, unless your alignment is thrown out by something

well basically the further out you go the bigger the problem. if you started with your stock 17X7 +38s or whatever they are. and you go to 19X11 +20 off the top of my head that's about 65mm further out. plus they are much heavier (even if the rims are lightweight there is no such thing as a light weight 19inch tyre) so yeah it will be putting more strain on suspension and bearings. but a wheel in that size is all about looks anyway as they would be useless from a performance point of view so I wouldn't worry about it too much. probably the only consequence you will find is that you flog out wheel bearings much faster than normal.

thats what i was worried about......with those specs do u think i would be risking serious damage or anything? i have plans of 300+rwkw.....so im a little worried about low offsets doing some dmg

you'll crash it anyway so what's the point?

also you should note that changing your track can make you car illegal. in VIC, you can only widen the rear track on an independant rear suspension car by 25mm (front is also 25mm), so that is 12.5mm per wheel. so that means you can only change the offset of the wheel by 12.5mm.

also having a wider rear track than front track can make the car a bit more unstable going into corners under brakes, and slightly easier to roll. having a wider rear track makes the dynamics a bit more like a trike.

also you should note that changing your track can make you car illegal. in VIC, you can only widen the rear track on an independant rear suspension car by 25mm (front is also 25mm), so that is 12.5mm per wheel. so that means you can only change the offset of the wheel by 12.5mm.

That's f**kin gay. I always thought it was 25mm on EACH side, but it's all together. Everything's f**kin illegal.

Would those wheels rub against your coilovers? They're pretty wide wheels on such a high-ish offset.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It's kind of interesting - They definitely do builds that split the difference between what they like and what will generate views and engagement. The NC Platform always surprises everyone in a good way, in an uncomfortably good way some may say. They could throw a LS in there and arguably have the best (and best performing) car of the entire stable. But that isn't necessarily what draws views, because people viewing don't want to accept the vegetables of a LS NC MX5 being a superior vehicle in every way (including fun) than a RB26 240Z. This is also why there's not a lot of content about the GR Yaris (on the web in general). They're too good, yet 'only a Yaris' The community doesn't want certain cars to be as good as they are - to beat their hero cars, and I believe the NC MX5 is absolutely one of those cars.
    • Yeah - My key still does the chime thing. I followed the procedure but it didn't activate on the (identical) third set of keyfob that I had. I vaguely remember the alarm saying you can only pair two keys with it. Now that I've dug it up, it appears that you very much can pair keyfobs to the alarm system. (which are the fobs I use to unlock the car). I have successfully diverted the thread and can probably not use the OEM keyfob ever again unless I use the aftermarket alarm and attempt to pair the OEM keyfob to it. Which might just work, or not :D. I definitely used the nissan method and not the aftermarket alarm method.
    • What makes it worse is that Nissan made keys in the same style, for example R34 and Stagea, but they work at different frequencies or something like that. So they look the same but the remotes are not interchangeable. I learned that from some guy selling aftermarket blank keys.
    • Does your door chime work when you have the key in the lock and open the door? I've had that disabled because it's f**king annoying and it is one thing that messes with the pairing. Because now the car doesn't detect key in ignition anymore and the slide-key-in-and-out sequence does not trigger the pairing mode anymore. The service manual has a section on the various bits involved in doing the syncing. I presume it'll be similar between Stagea and R34.
    • Agree, but meh, I think is is based more on LOLS than actually apples to apples, like, who would have thunk a turbo 4 cylinder would not beat a NA 4 cylinder  I think with just basic N/A mods, like a exhaust and tune, it would be equal to the Mini in its current form, maybe I know my current 2.5 would "chop the mini" as the midrange now has a night and day difference in power delivery compared to the tuned 2.0, by around 20kwatw and 30nm from around 2k rpm "ish"....... I'm kinda hoping that they do a N/A build, either with the MZR 2.0 or with whatever they decide to use If I recall correctly they did talk about K swapping one a while ago
×
×
  • Create New...