Jump to content
SAU Community

The Sa Wasteland


Cubes
 Share

Recommended Posts

haha, boy did the main page get a clean up once Andrew logged on
what i miss pc has been stuffed so havnt been on, just at uni now :(

I might have cleaned up a bit :) .... yes the number of useless/repost/wrong section threads seems to be increasing .... might be time for me to sticky another rant ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i wouldnt recommend going 6x9's in a skyline unless u plan on not running a sub. 6.5ichs will give u alot clearer sound and maybe like one sub in the boot will do. Depends what u like.

thats why ive got 6x9s in the back and 6" in the doors

plenty bass for what i want , i had a 5 amp 3 sub system in my commodore , im over it haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

heres a quick snap:

post-16018-1223548228_thumb.jpg

might be able to mount them vertically/diagonally or something...

i've got fusion 6.5"s under the stocko covers but one of em is blown and vibrates/sounds like shite. been meaning to replace em for years

yeah you could easily work around that man ,

if your going to make a new parcel shelf then youd have to use thin wood and use the current one as a template for the strut brace

Link to comment
Share on other sites

agreed, subs FTL. 6x9s + a good set of 6 inches in the door is all you need for a nice clear sound.

im gonna amp my speakers when ive got the money

all my speakers are 300w each so will sound better with an amp imo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im sure you could work around it couldnt you ?

heres a quick snap:

post-16018-1223548228_thumb.jpg

might be able to mount them vertically/diagonally or something...

i've got fusion 6.5"s under the stocko covers but one of em is blown and vibrates/sounds like shite. been meaning to replace em for years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I might have cleaned up a bit ;) .... yes the number of useless/repost/wrong section threads seems to be increasing .... might be time for me to sticky another rant :(

yep, go for a sticky rant i rkn. I mean, im a whore, i admit that, but i always shoot my questions through the wasteland, well most of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...