Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Google-translate that shit! It has 1 owner, original k's with books/receipts for the dash change. Cleanest 32 GTR I've seen in a long time: http://www.kurumaerabi.com/?page=syousai&a...mp;stock_id=403

Google-translate that, too! Another clean as 32 GTR: http://wwww.kurumaerabi.com/?page=syousai&...mp;stock_id=348

And that's why I love 32 GTR's. F*cking porn: http://page4.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/d88463104

i sometimes like to look @ trade car view

the last one you posted is on there also

1619205_2.jpg<<CLICK 20k US

1618179_2.jpg<<CLICK 6k US

1606136_7.jpg<<CLICK 22.9k US

1459959_2.jpg<<CLICK 7.7K US

1111544_2.jpg<<CLICK 3.7K US

1595673_2.jpg<<CLICK 23k US

1557203_2.jpg<<CLICK unmolested Vspec 44k US 4.5 grade

1550819_2.jpg<<CLICK 19k

one for Ryan with S3 projector headlights :thumbsup:

1550792_2.jpg<<CLICK 34k US

could post up all night just drool on :ermm: all Prices are FOB and final price would be pushed up due to shipping customs gov charges compliance and importer's fee's

and one for me ;)

1473913_2.jpg<<CLICK 22k US

stock turbo looses its efficientcy above 11-12psi anyway...no point going any higher.
i wouldn't agree with that

but running @ 14psi will shorten the life of your turbo

also note i couldnt find it before

but i didn't go against what you said just to be an asshat it is documented a RB25 turbo on a RB20 engine is quiet capable of 14-15psi this is why i believe on a RB25 engine it isnt running out of efficiency @ 13-14

The Rb25 turbo on an rb20... Push 14-15psi in to it, tune and you can expect ~190rwkw.

And they lag around the same as an rb30 with a gt35r 1.06 on its side. But obviously have stuff all torque off boost. :thumbsup:

The best option for an rb20 is to slap a highflow on it and push as much boost as you can in to it; the little 2ltr needs all the help it can get to bring up that mid range power.

source

Have a look at some efficiency tables. People dont realise that it's not all about boost in alot of cases. A stock turbo works sooo much harder to produce 13-14psi than a much larger turbo. A smaller turbo working harder than a larger one has 10 times more heat than a slightly larger turbo on the same psi. Heat is the main cause for it's loss in efficiency. Heat is the main contributor for power loss. Heat is another contributor for detonation. Heat Heat Heat. 10-12 PSI is the effiency range for that sized turbo combination. It's been proven over and over and over again. It pays to spend time on all sorts of cars using different sized turbo's and watching power DIVE when you add any more HEAT and BOOST into a turbo that isn't efficient for those settings.

Edited by Ryanrb25

Also, you can't compare an rb25 turbo's efficiency on an RB20 because an RB20 if your unaware is a 2L. Being a 2L it has less stroke, less flow, less heat so therefore the effiencienfy range for that specific turbo goes up a tad. Efficiency can also be determined with front and rear housing not matching at a certain flow level. At 10-12psi the rear housing of the rb25 turbo is just large enough to not create surges caused by lack of flow in relation to how much the front housing is squeezing into the motor. Where as at 12psi and above, the front housing is flowing a tad too much volume for that tiny little rear housing to handle....sure it will cope, but it gets f**kn hot. Hense where the heat comes into play, in turn heatsoaking the front housing a whole lot more..taking efficiency away from the turbo. Another reason efficiency can be effected is because the front wheel of the compressor is designed to flow a certain amount of air at a certain speed. Just like a water pump, Behaving fairly simular, if you speed the front wheel up and the pitch of the front wheel is incorrect for speed it is turning, Just like a water pump it can cavitate the air and be useless. Hence why if you use the wrong pitch of the prop on a plane at the wrong speed then the plane will loose momentum. Once again the same with a water pump, if the impellor's pitch doesn't suit the speed it is turning at it will can cavitate and there for loose efficiency.

hahaha that's awesome...good find.

haha , i know

my mate just bought an n12 turbo this arvo with an exa front , ill find a pic of it in a sec but seeing as he lost his licence a couple of months ago

i was driving it around most of tonight haha, i rocked up to a mates place and pretended i sold my skyline and bought it , he was like WTF ,

funniest thing is its a 1.5 turbo haha

Madaz, great finds with those Skylines!! They're amazing! It's good to see that there's still quality in the Skyline market in Japan - and now with the R35 out, Skyline popularity (especially the 32 GTR's) have 'skyrocketed' again, bringing out some awesome ones!

Good ol' Koshi got on the hoon bagging band-wagon this morning at 7:10am... showing more NSW/Vic footage of VN's spinning the wheels, etc. Then started talking to a random cop about it. Then they showed a story of some P plater kid who had his VR impounded 4 times for hoon driving.

Then, I flicked it over to Channel 9 and they were running a interview with Angry Anderson about hoon driving and his thoughts on it, and then they showed interstate footage of burnouts, etc.

The media can't get enough of the hoon bashing shit!! There's a f**king war in the Gaza strip, and all they care about is speaking to VR-owning P platers about burnouts!

/endrant

For the record, I hate Koshi and Mel. They're too happy for that time of the morning and it pisses me off!

Hey people just wondering what you like about your skyline or skylines in general, and why you like them. I like them becaue of the sleek sporty look, realiability and the power :laugh:
i like them because i live in adelaide and i drive a barina.

Lol what an awesome reply to that post...

Rory Thompson does the lock bars, 0414948028 or in ph book under rory thompson services, on rundle road salisbury south (next to post office)

$325 - went up in price :laugh: think I'll use that as a last resort

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have engineer in my job title One of or motto's though is "we make and we break"
    • This is actually 2 whole different trains of thought that need to be addressed separately. No, as Matt says above, "Engineer" is not a directly protected title. A lot of guys who just do mechanical design via CAD, with or without even some sort of associate diploma in engineering, often have the job title of "Design Engineer". A train driver can probably still describe themselves as an engineer. But, to usefully get employment with anyone as a proper engineer, you're going to have to have at least the necessary and relevant degree qualification. You're not going to get a job as an electrical engineer if you have a chem eng degree, unless you can demonstrate x number of years of working in that capacity, sufficient knowledge, etc. Having the degree is at least in indication that you've seen the relevant text books, even if you haven't read them (like pretty much the last 10 years of graduates!). To be a self employed engineer.....you could get away with quite a lot pretending that you're suitably qualified, without actually being a proper engineer. But, you will find yourself unable to work for a large section of the client space because a lot demand CVs and capability statements when considering contracting for any engineering work these days. Insurances too. If you're not a proper engineer, it will be much harder to obtain proper PI insurance. Insurance companies have gotten hip to that. The "Professional Engineer" thing is a thing in Australia. If you have the right qualifications and experience you can apply to the relevant engineering top level body (mostly Engineers Australia, the less said about whom, the better), to be assessed and approved as a Chartered Professional Engineer, CPE. There are high bars to get over and a requirement for CPD to maintain it. The RPEQ thing is similar-ish, in that you have to demonstrate and maintain, but the bars are a little lower. It is required to be RPEQ in order to sign off as an engineer on any engineering design in Queensland. The other states haven't fully followed suit yet. There's "engineering" and there's "engineering". Being an engineer that signs off on timber (or even steel) frames for housing projects, council creek crossing bridges, etc, is a flavour of civil engineering that barely warrants the name, description and degree. That would be soul crushing work anyway. Being an automotive engineer working in the space where you have to sign off on modifications to cars and trucks would also be similarly soul crushing. At least partly because of the level of clientelle, their expecations, depths of bank balance, etc. And that brings us to your second question. No, we do not have professional engineers "do vehicle inspections". Well, not the regular roadworthies, etc etc. That's done by mechanics. There might be some vehicle standards engineers at the various state govco inspection stations where cars go to get defects cleared and so on, but that's because they (the cars) are there specifically for defect inspection and clearance and so the stakes are a little higher than on an annual lights and brakes working check. But, if you modify a vehicle in Australia, you have to get it engineered. A suitably qualified (and effectively licensed, which I will get back to) automotive engineer will have to go over the application, advise on what would be required to make the mods legal, supervise some parts of the work, inspect and test the results, and sign off. The "licensed" aspect comes from there being a list of approved engineers to do these things in each state. They have to jump through hoops set up by the govco vehicle standards divisions that mean only the suitably qualified can offer to and approve such mods.
    • It's got a problem Prank... It looks like both washer spray caps have fallen off this car... 😛
    • Meh, it's only got to last another 10 years or so until you'll be forbidden to drive it. Keep it dry and forget about it.
    • The title of Engineer is not protected. However different states have different rules about what an Engineer requires to operate. Engineering for a motor vehicle modification is very different to engineering for a bridge, electronics, etc, including what that engineer needs as certifications.   In Canberra, "Engineer" is the loosest category with basically nothing stopping you calling yourself and engineer and designing a bridge or building. From what I've reviewed, QLD has the strictest requirements through RPEIQ.
×
×
  • Create New...