The Sa Wasteland

[craig R33]

ok. you win.

you had me at crack whore

[Dohmar]

sorry, but no.

it doesnt get much better than crack whores, meth heads, single wheel peels, near collisions, and swearing that you can hear from a block away.

Ahh.

Northies.

rofl

-D

[SLED]

If it's all in a public register than you should go look it up you'll find it under 'bent over for running an amber light'. I stated already that it wasn't worth the money for a lawyer to risk losing when it's my word against a cop and I've got 9 points in the bank.

You want me to name to cop that wrote the affidavit? and my name?

Why would I do that?

It's quite clear to me that you obviously hang on every word that any cop has ever typed in an affidavit and believe it's impossible for a cop to get it wrong in an affidavit.

I commend you SLED for being a believer, good on you.

Now I'll cease posting anything else that remotely comes close to the law or law enforcement.

Far out Talbo, if I was you I'd go easy .... that was a big knee-jerk reaction to a fairly harmless (and in fact in some ways reinforcing) post by Sled .... you had better hope he is in a good mood when he reads that, as if he is not I suspect you might get a little holiday from the forums

The guy is pretty much calling me a liar and you think I'm the one who's over reacted. What part of it is going to get me a holiday?

ROFL.....how the hell did you come to the conclusion that I was referring to you as a liar, I've read my post again and I'm buggered if I can tell......maybe engage your brain first bud and have another read.

I'm definitely not interested in wasting my time by bringing up the local register to see what went down and what I generally find when conducting a factual interview (ie. interrogation) is that when peeps get defensive as quickly as you do, there's usually more digging required.

Based on your responses to my genuinely inquiring style of posts, I've concluded that I was completely wrong about one bit of advice (referring to self representation), and you were 100% correct........yes, you would've needed a lawyer.

[craig R33]

if there is one respectable man on this forum, in which advice i will never take fore-granted (have actually used his advice)

its Pete.

/ but kiss.

[scandyflick]

red hair, brown nose...

... yup, nothin out of the ordinary here.

[Matty 31]

off defect

*does a lil dance*

[craig R33]

okkkkkkkkk.

[scandyflick]

lol, nothin against you craig.

i just know a lot of red brown nosers. lol.

[scandyflick]

off defect

*does a lil dance*

now go an get done in the patrol for too low and too loud.

[MissR34]

[TALBO]

ROFL.....how the hell did you come to the conclusion that I was referring to you as a liar, I've read my post again and I'm buggered if I can tell......maybe engage your brain first bud and have another read.

, obviously not your affidavit so why didn't you argue it if you didn't agree with it.....unless it was accurate and you were telling little porkies, yeah

So you're saying there is no question that the officer who wrote the affidavit has got it 100% accurate or it wasn't my affidavit and that if in fact it was my affidavit then I'm a liar?

definitely not interested in wasting my time by bringing up the local register to see what went down and what I generally find when conducting a factual interview (ie. interrogation) is that when peeps get defensive as quickly as you do, there's usually more digging required.

Based on your responses to my genuinely inquiring style of posts, I've concluded that I was completely wrong about one bit of advice (referring to self representation), and you were 100% correct........yes, you would've needed a lawyer.

If I misunderstood that statement you made yesterday (italics) then I sincerely apologize as that is what got me on the defensive so early on.

Again your 'genuine inquiring style of posts' didn't come across as genuine to me because of the italic section, again I apologize.

Yes you're 100% right, I should've got a lawyer being my first time in court because I was being naive to contest the fine without having read the affidavit first.... accurate or not. Now I know for next time, although I'd rather not go there again if you know what I mean!

[Matty 31]

oh pete, heres that stuff i was meant to post the other day for ya

And I quote:

"On Land Cruiser 200 model vehicles where fitted with Toyota genuine bull bars, especially if they operate for long periods in harsh usage conditions such as corrugated roads, the bull bar mounting bracket design allows excessive load to be applied to the front frame portion that supports the bull bar. This can result in cracking of the frame welds.

If the vehicle with the frame cracked is continued to be driven in these conditions, in the worse case, the crack increases, which potentially may result in the bull bar detaching from the vehicle.

Note: This condition is purely results from inadequate bull bar mounting bracket design. Therefore only vehicles fitted with genuine bull bars are involved (Non-genuine bull bars have independently engineered mounting brackets). "

Owners will be notified by mailout soon

[MissR34]

im bored as atm

whats going on peoples?

[Nightcrawler]

^^^ I still have about 5 hours of reports to type tonight .... after 12 hours of inspections today .... then get some sleep before getting up at 5:30am to be at The Clipsal by 6:45am to have Nova 91.9 bbq Brekkie .... after 4 hours sleep last night too .... not sure how I am going to stay awake. Wooooooooooooooooooooo Clipsal!

[Carbon 34]

im bored as atm

whats going on peoples?

bit like that here too.lol

got damos old bar on looks better now, broken taillights inside still, most of the little pegs are broken, nissspares has a white one, see what i can do to sort this one

photos of my rotors and calipers, opions???? it better or worse?

still need to hit them with another coat of paint, detail the rim,paint the missing faded "GT logo" back on the rims. should say (ns gt 2)

rotors arent seated yet, only been on the car for a few weeks, minimal driving

[MissR34]

they look good troy......nicely done........i was thinking of doing mine blue but im not too sure

[MissR34]

^^^ I still have about 5 hours of reports to type tonight .... after 12 hours of inspections today .... then get some sleep before getting up at 5:30am to be at The Clipsal by 6:45am to have Nova 91.9 bbq Brekkie .... after 4 hours sleep last night too .... not sure how I am going to stay awake. Wooooooooooooooooooooo Clipsal!

i hate you.

but

how bout this

ill swap you.........ill got to the clipsal 2moro morning for you and you can go to my work for me lol sounds like a good deal andrew? hehehe

[SLED]

oh pete, heres that stuff i was meant to post the other day for ya

thanks Matty, I actually went to Jarvis Toyota today and found out that I need to attend to approx 4 recalls since the truck 1st came out in 2007.

Bullbar brackets and new tailshaft are 2 of the major ones that need attention.

[DamageInc]

thanks Matty, I actually went to Jarvis Toyota today and found out that I need to attend to approx 4 recalls since the truck 1st came out in 2007.

Bullbar brackets and new tailshaft are 2 of the major ones that need attention.

pics of said truck ?

[scandyflick]

1. open google

2. search pics

3. search for '200 series landcruiser'

4. ????

5. PROFIT!!!!