Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i like his work, was going to buy a custom front pipe off nigelswazi that he had made by Andrew but cash didnt allow!

wasnt he selling a moonface mfr or something? i want one of those.

Any time, let him know I pointed him your way :)

geez, only thinkin of yourself eh?

:ninja:

Sadly my small mind agrees with this concept

awesome.

im thinking a career change is in order for me. im pretty good with this financial advice stuff.

i cant seem to send any pm's anyway ruby if you get this can you cancel my membership app with sau-sa if you got the pdf i sent to you by e-mail cheers

ps its fine to drop the timing light off tomorrow night

Edited by R334door(s2)

Anyone know much about valiants? Bay to birdwood is coming this weekend and my grandparents valiant has been sitting in the garage for 3 yrs. Pretty keen to take it out. Any idea what would need replacing before cranking it over?

What oil to use where, and where to buy parts if I need them?

Cheers luke.

I cant agree. Hitler did want to be a champion of the west and that they would accept his ideals of purity and romantic grandiose architecture... britain was at war with germany before he even declared war on russia (historical fact) so I cant see how you'd say his attacking russia would deter british aggression. Hitler would never have wanted to make russia part of germany because he considered the russians as genetically inferior, barbaric people. Aka not enough aryan blood.

Hitler was always after russia, for more territory, more land, for a passage to the sea, farm land, oil etc.. so every german could farm and prosper. He regarded russians in the same ways as jews and slavs. When he lost the battle for the Syberian dessert (could be wrong about the name) as thats where he planned to "migrate" the jews, he wanted to "migrate" them to russia and work them to death. War with the west was of no value untill after conquereing russia. He imagined a showdown with the west but not untill years after it happened. He believed Britian depended heavily on russia and if he smashed russia quickly then Britian would lose that "base", and be forced into a piece settlement.

The russians were better armed and had superior tanks and the AK-47 is still the most reliable weapon, i believe, today. I always thought they just weren't trained well enough. Take Stalingrad room by room, horrific fighting.

I can sort of see similarities between Hitler and Mike Rann...

Evil begets evil; it is said that the end justifies the means, however one cannot admire their means when their ends amount to failure; and double that when the end amounts to success but at the cost of ones own self righteousness

That is just gold.

Anyone know much about valiants? Bay to birdwood is coming this weekend and my grandparents valiant has been sitting in the garage for 3 yrs. Pretty keen

u officially entering? ill be cruising along the path somewhere to check out the cars n chuckle at the kids getting overexcited about a skyline :ninja:

If i get the valiant up and running and learn how to drive it i'll just tag along in it. If not i'll take the 34 for a drive after they have all left and go up for a look.

Haha... is it column shift manual?

Talbo. maybe u dont get wasted enough.

No not these days but I can tell you we raised hell in my younger days playing in bands :ninja:

I cant agree. Hitler did want to be a champion of the west and that they would accept his ideals of purity and romantic grandiose architecture... britain was at war with germany before he even declared war on russia (historical fact) so I cant see how you'd say his attacking russia would deter british aggression. Hitler would never have wanted to make russia part of germany because he considered the russians as genetically inferior, barbaric people. Aka not enough aryan blood.

Hitler was always after russia, for more territory, more land, for a passage to the sea, farm land, oil etc.. so every german could farm and prosper. He regarded russians in the same ways as jews and slavs. When he lost the battle for the Syberian dessert (could be wrong about the name) as thats where he planned to "migrate" the jews, he wanted to "migrate" them to russia and work them to death. War with the west was of no value untill after conquereing russia. He imagined a showdown with the west but not untill years after it happened. He believed Britian depended heavily on russia and if he smashed russia quickly then Britian would lose that "base", and be forced into a piece settlement.

The russians were better armed and had superior tanks and the AK-47 is still the most reliable weapon, i believe, today. I always thought they just weren't trained well enough. Take Stalingrad room by room, horrific fighting.

I can sort of see similarities between Hitler and Mike Rann...

Evil begets evil; it is said that the end justifies the means, however one cannot admire their means when their ends amount to failure; and double that when the end amounts to success but at the cost of ones own self righteousness

That is just gold.

Lebensraum.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...