Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

do an rb20/30 Rubes :)

Doing some shopping around.

Thinking an RB30/25 build for one car, and an RB22.5(25)/20 build for another particular car. And I'm not talking about the car(s) you think I am. Then get the plate RRB 225 = Race RB 2.25 lt

:P

Doing some shopping around.

Thinking an RB30/25 build for one car, and an RB22.5(25)/20 build for another particular car. And I'm not talking about the car(s) you think I am. Then get the plate RRB 225 = Race RB 2.25 lt

:)

that will go nicely in the volvo aye ruby :D:P

Cara if your after 300 at the moment then you will something like a GT3071 + cams +porting + lots of boost and you may just still fall under 300kw but it will be more responsive that the other option which is a GT3076 which will make 300 with cams and has the potential to make more.

As for the RB25/30 build, if you are after a big power engine then do yourself a favour an go for a 26 head straight away. 26's have all the good stuff straight away like solid lifters and cams to suit as well as not having the VTC gear which you can't run with big cams. Although the NEO's have the solid setup they have a problem with an exposed oil gallery once you go over 9.25mm of lift and therefore your potential power is limited. The other good thing about the 26 heads is the availability of aftermarket parts like a wide selection of cams, valves, springs etc etc.

you have pretty horrible taste in women craig...

Thinking of building a little project myself ...

<shopping list>

... for starters!

Want car to put it in? :P

R31 Excel GT, Series 2, rolling on 15x8 -5 SSR Mesh fronts and 15x9 -15 Longchamp rears with heavily flared guards. sitting on the deck of course.

problem with that is, with the irs setup they run being designed somewhere back in early 1850's, youd be putting the diff through the earths core everytime you got on the gas.

Edited by scandyflick
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Means something is not set up right, tune/calibration related.  
    • Finally replaced the previous temporary mesh indicator surrounds (temporary was the last 10+ years 😂) with a 3D printed GTR style version for the front indicators. I think it looks a lot nicer than the old setup and at least the indicators now point in the correct direction rather than angled off. Needed a little bit of tweaking to deal with the intercooler piping but got there in the end. Old and new photos below. 
    • It's weird to me that you say this because I'm pretty sure locals with relatively standard standalone tunes (boost/barometric compensated alpha-N) still have driveability issues when they pop intercooler hoses. Maybe with enough data I can just train some kind of model that spits out an expected grams/cyl given every sensor input except MAF like what FCA did with their Pentastar 3.6 ECU logic. Basically stock everything. The main motivation honestly is to have a sensor that can be a decent baseline source of truth. In scenarios you're describing obviously it won't work every time but it seems to me the number of corner cases that exist in MAF load is maybe not as severe and difficult to manage vs ITB alpha-N with some MAP/barometric compensation.
    • What are your plans for your blow off valves? Purely plumb back? How soft will the spring in them be? AFM can be tricky to get super smooth and nice, especially depending on the rest of the system, and then can be very easily upset if something slightly changes. IE, even if you run recirc blow off valves, you could still see issues getting it to behave at certain load points as turbos might start to spool, but you release the throttle but it's not enough pressure to crack the bov open to recirc, and you can end up with reversion which can cause double metering, and hence dumping of fuel into the system, and stalling the engine.   If you're going to run a map sensor for closed loop boost control from the ECU, what makes you want to keep the AFM?    
    • It's not bad, it's just not flexible. And say if you have any leaks between the MAF and plenum, well then your load axis goes out the window. Here's a real world scenario, I blew off an intercooler hose last track day, as the clamp decided to Bluetooth itself somewhere. Still continued to do 2 laps and drive it to the pub for a couple of beers then home. Good luck doing that with a MAF setup 
×
×
  • Create New...