Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Steering racks on the early VL Walkinshaw Commodores. They got rubbed out of the results for that.

Although if you were big at JRA I would be interested to hear your comment on the inflatable fuel bladder story that appeared in the current edition of motorsport news (Not the online one, the one at the news stand).

Also were the Group A 3.5 L Rovers actually any good?

Oh and how the 87 VL that Walkinshaw built compared to Larry's example.

And, and, and.....

I worked at JRA, so I don't know anything about Walkinshaw's other cars, so let's stick to that. If you check the Bathurst results you will find that both cars ran shorter distances between pit stops on their tanks than the competion. Which if they were running oversized tanks would not have been the case. If you have the 1985 video, then please check the length of the pit stops, you will find that the fuel refilling is very similar timing to the other cars. Which would not be the case if the tanks were of larger capacity, hence taking longer to fill. The cars did have a 6/7 litre reserve, a warning light came on on the dash when they fuel level got that low, the driver them switched to the reserve, I can't remember what the switching method was, if I ever knew it. I never saw any more than the legal amount of fuel put in the cars from Wednesday to Sunday. The refueling rig was calibrated and they used scales to measure the fuel put in at every pit stop, my maths is good enough to do the sums on the SG of the fuel used.

The Rovers were good cars, nicely prepared, very well balanced, with great handling and brakes. They just lacked capacity, torque really, which at Bathurst is primary. We did a press day at Oran Park and Percy whipped in a few laps at close to lap record pace. The long climb up the mountain really hurt them, but on a handling circuit they were rapid.

Cheers

Gary

  • Replies 169
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I worked at JRA, so I don't know anything about Walkinshaw's other cars, so let's stick to that. If you check the Bathurst results you will find that both cars ran shorter distances between pit stops on their tanks than the competion. Which if they were running oversized tanks would not have been the case. If you have the 1985 video, then please check the length of the pit stops, you will find that the fuel refilling is very similar timing to the other cars. Which would not be the case if the tanks were of larger capacity, hence taking longer to fill. The cars did have a 6/7 litre reserve, a warning light came on on the dash when they fuel level got that low, the driver them switched to the reserve, I can't remember what the switching method was, if I ever knew it. I never saw any more than the legal amount of fuel put in the cars from Wednesday to Sunday. The refueling rig was calibrated and they used scales to measure the fuel put in at every pit stop, my maths is good enough to do the sums on the SG of the fuel used.

The Rovers were good cars, nicely prepared, very well balanced, with great handling and brakes. They just lacked capacity, torque really, which at Bathurst is primary. We did a press day at Oran Park and Percy whipped in a few laps at close to lap record pace. The long climb up the mountain really hurt them, but on a handling circuit they were rapid.

Cheers

Gary

What ever happened to the pink rover?

Edited by Jetwreck
I worked at JRA, so I don't know anything about Walkinshaw's other cars, so let's stick to that. If you check the Bathurst results you will find that both cars ran shorter distances between pit stops on their tanks than the competion. Which if they were running oversized tanks would not have been the case. If you have the 1985 video, then please check the length of the pit stops, you will find that the fuel refilling is very similar timing to the other cars. Which would not be the case if the tanks were of larger capacity, hence taking longer to fill. The cars did have a 6/7 litre reserve, a warning light came on on the dash when they fuel level got that low, the driver them switched to the reserve, I can't remember what the switching method was, if I ever knew it. I never saw any more than the legal amount of fuel put in the cars from Wednesday to Sunday. The refueling rig was calibrated and they used scales to measure the fuel put in at every pit stop, my maths is good enough to do the sums on the SG of the fuel used.

The Rovers were good cars, nicely prepared, very well balanced, with great handling and brakes. They just lacked capacity, torque really, which at Bathurst is primary. We did a press day at Oran Park and Percy whipped in a few laps at close to lap record pace. The long climb up the mountain really hurt them, but on a handling circuit they were rapid.

Cheers

Gary

I'll have a look at the video. From memory most teams were still hoiking fuel churns at that stage?

Oh and what really claimed the lead car. Never believed the horseshit about it ingesting headlight glass...

What the Slako/Leeds(?) hot pink number????

Damn...I did an edit...you got to it before I hit update. I think thats it....pretty sure it was white or red before that...Alf Barbagallo.

post-37023-1201757159.jpg

Edited by Jetwreck
I'll have a look at the video. From memory most teams were still hoiking fuel churns at that stage?

From memory 1984 (Rovers) was churns and 1985 (Jags) was an overhead rig, no maybe we didn't use overhead rigs until the BMW's. Too many Bathursts ago, 1,000's and 12 Hour races to remember, maybe time I got the video out again myself. When they were used, the churns were filled from 44's, which were on scales to record their usage. My pit job was crunching numbers, TWR had their own technicians, no Aussies got to touch the cars much at all.

Oh and what really claimed the lead car. Never believed the horseshit about it ingesting headlight glass...

The #1car was Percy and Walkinshaw, finished 3rd

The #3 Car was Goss and Hahne, finished 1st

The #2 car was Soper and Allem, it swallowed the glass.

The foam air filters were directly behind the headlights, one on each side, so it is possible that the broken headlight (reflector) punctured the filter and got sucked in. There were pieces of glass and reflector that fell on the pit garage flooor under the car when it came back. The car went back to the UK untouched, I never saw it with the bonnet open, so I don't know the real story if it was any different. We got a couple of drivers drunk during the celebrations, as you do, but we couldn't get anything contrary out of them. I have seen Gossy a number times over the years and he sticks to the corporate line, maybe that's all he knows as well.

Cheers

Gary

We got a couple of drivers drunk during the celebrations, as you do, but we couldn't get anything contrary out of them. I have seen Gossy a number times over the years and he sticks to the corporate line, maybe that's all he knows as well.

You had to get Gossy pissed to get him to talk? :P How did you ever get him to shut up?

He's alright. Deserved his Bathurst wins no end.

Awww, all this talk of Rover SD1's is making me all nostalgic!

My old man had a special order black 5 speed back in '84/85 that he had Asquith & Johnston stroke and cam. Me being a lil' 9 year old thought dad's car was just the best thing ever, and looking back, it was a good car, probably less issues with that car than any either he or I have ever owned!

Few years back I seriously toyed with building a quick one, but realised that on my budget it meant turfing most of the Rover stuff and fitting Holden gear, so I dropped the plan, built a 32 gtr instead. :P

End sobby-eyed rant gents, my apologies.

Thanks mate!!!! >_<

Great pics on this thread, great discussion.

I also picked up the new mag with the GIO GT-R on the cover. It's great seeing these cars back out on the track to enjoy all over again. I enjoyed the article too (error on engine capacity notwithstanding). However, it seems (quite understandably but unfortunately) that Jim Richards' podium outburst is the one point journalists seem to fixate on. Not the fact that that the race was run in possibly the most atrocious conditions to hit the Mountain on race day; that the world lost a champion in Denny Hulme; that it was essentially the last true Group A Bathurst.... All of these are landmark, but the overriding story seems to be Jim's deserved reply to a bunch of knuckle dragging oxygen thieves. It's a shame the race isn't remembered for more than that.....

Awww, all this talk of Rover SD1's is making me all nostalgic!

My old man had a special order black 5 speed back in '84/85 that he had Asquith & Johnston stroke and cam. Me being a lil' 9 year old thought dad's car was just the best thing ever, and looking back, it was a good car, probably less issues with that car than any either he or I have ever owned!

Few years back I seriously toyed with building a quick one, but realised that on my budget it meant turfing most of the Rover stuff and fitting Holden gear, so I dropped the plan, built a 32 gtr instead. :D

End sobby-eyed rant gents, my apologies.

You would enjoy this one then. It was a red manual with 16 x 8 Simmons gold 3 piece wheels and a 5 litre with the twin throttle bodies off the Group A Vittesse. The 5 litre was the all alloy P76 block, with a forged crank, rods and pistons from the Formula 5000 engine run that was built for the Ansett Elfin (later Anset Charger). It made ~375 hp at the wheels on the Town & Country dyno at Hornsby. I drove it from Warwick to Ipswich and it hardly got below 200 kph all the way. Nice car that one, I didn't like giving it up. :D

Cheers

Gary

lol...I totally agree with all of your statement accept one. I don't have any problem with any Groups A....I do however have major issue's with the V8 Supercars though.....yawn...boring!!

Hey tell me one thing if you know on the B & H Sierra's. In 87 & 88 they were right hand drive. Then in 89 & 90 they were left hand drive. Does this mean that the 87 & 88 cars were built locally and the 89 & 90 car's were from the German Group A series?

OK I dug out an old Bathurst year book & the following were the circumstances:

1. In 1987 There were no B & H Sierras- Frank Gardner ran the JPS M3's that year. The following year (1988) Brock ran the BMW's after his bust up with Holden.

2. They took two Sierras to Bathurst in 1988. Only one ran in the race - winning it as it happens. The left hand drive car sat in the garage and wasn't used in the race. The right hand drive car was the race car. It was the same one that ran the ATCC in white for Longhurst.

3. The two 88 cars were not German. The annual desribes the race winner as "A Don Smith shell fitted out with a kit of components from Andy Rouse" The car was built in Sydney before being shipped North. It was rebuilt before that years Sandown 500.

4. Some bloke called Campbell Little did the engines.

5. Frank Gardner's name was mud in Europe at Ford because his name went on the joint protest that rubbed out the Texaco cars in 1987. So Tomas Mezera was used as an intermediary to buy alot of the parts they needed.

6. I wouldn't expect that latter cars were anything other than locally built.

Someone was asking about TV cameras... These are the Grice/Percy ETCC/BTCC R31, but theres some nice clear frontal pics of the camera setup which was in use over there - possibly similar to here.

WinPercy_1988_Donny_GTS-R_2.jpg

WinPercy_1988_Donny_GTS-R.jpg

Edited by floody
Someone was asking about TV cameras... These are the Grice/Percy ETCC/BTCC R31, but theres some nice clear frontal pics of the camera setup which was in use over there - possibly similar to here.

WinPercy_1988_Donny_GTS-R_2.jpg

WinPercy_1988_Donny_GTS-R.jpg

That was me. Thanks so much for the pictures. I thought the Aussie racecams may have bene larger cameras, but in the absence of any evidence to that, this is fantastic. Thanks!!!!

Also, that was a Nismo Japan car so the cage woudl most likely have been different to the GMS cars? Still good find.

Oh absolutely, most likely different; but possibly there wouldn't have been a massive variance in camera tech then, plus perhaps as now there was an FIA spec for the housing etc...So its probably a reasonable illustrative example.

the R32 must have been a revelation when it was released in 1989.

it pisses me off when people compare the earlier GTR's to more modern performance cars without realising how revolutionary they must have been at the time of their release.

The GT-R completely wiped the floor with it's competitors when released, and for less money too- i.e 964 model Porsche 911, Ferrari 348, Lotus Esprit.

History repeats.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I haven’t taken them out of the cases yet    inside the box is this packaging which is pretty much like a massive blister pack 
    • Purchased a NC MX5 a while ago Basic suspension mods done, BC coils and Whiteline sway bars  New DBA calipers, discs and pads Added some 17 x 8 Konig Decagrams with 215/45 17 PS5's Added some typical NA bolt on's, i.e. full exhaust and intake  Added 0.5ltrs with a MZR2.5 swap, nice bump in torques  Found a detachable hard top which is locked in for a colour match with my local paint shop in Feb 25, this also includes some PDR as it has received a few love taps from parking in the local shops when in the hands of my Minister for War and Finances, me, I park nowhere near other cars and typically park on the street The little thing is awesome, I drive it everywhere, it handles like a dream whether I'm up it or just cruising  But now,  because I'm a idiot, I keep looking at turbo kits....... did I mention I'm a idiot Why is dose so appealing  All of the NA 2.5 glory, well.......until sometime in 2025 anyway....🤪  
    • I would not be surprised if you are the only person on earth that has the interest/desire to do that lol.  The Haltech base map is a really good starting point, the car will fire easily and drive very well, even on mild boost levels. To me, following your advice sounds like some sort of ancient Chinese water torcher lol (this is not an insult Josh, never change <3)
    • Those car show concepts from the 2000's and 2010's like the Floria and IDx were brilliant and should've gone ahead, at least one of them. But neither Honda nor Nissan are thinking about affordable performance any more, which is truly sad.  Even if Toyota's liquid hydrogen ICE development reaches the point where it's commercially viable and the infrastructure to support it, Honda/Nissan would have to wait until Toyota allow fee access to their patents to offer it with any smaller performance models they released to take advantage of it.  
    • A sporty manual RWD coupe with a IL4 Honda engine would only be a good thing I assume we won't see anything released for a few years though, unless informal talks and designs have been going on for a few years,  and due to the current, and future, emmisions and safety requirements, I assume anything "sporty" they would do would be at least some hybrid thingie And hopefully anything they are thinking of has nice lines, without lots of plastic and fake bits hanging off it like that horrendous FK8 that looked like it was designed by a 13 year old The other issue of course in the current market is cost, currently the type R is around $70k, a twin is around $50k Meh, I'm old and grumpy and would rather buy a older model car and waste my coin on that than buying anything currently available new  
×
×
  • Create New...