Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 195
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

to borrow someone elses comment on another model.

"I'd love to take it to nismo and say, GO NUTS"

i want a gtr for 80k or my next car will be something else in that price range!@... gimme a frign R bish

Approx. $150k according to this article. No offense but personally, I think the design is bordering on fugly. The only thing going for it is its name and performance numbers. Overhangs are too long and the interior looks too old fashioned - the radio controls remind me of the CB radio. Design will look old in 2 yrs time, maybe less. Then again, beauty is in the eyes of the beholder but for $150k, I might consider the V8 M3.

http://www.editorial.discountnewcars.com.a...A25737D002260A5

its built for americans... so look at it from behind american beer goggles. thats where nissan's main market is these days... and unfortunately their design gearing.

you will be sadly disappointed if you buy a m3 instead. they struggle to keep up with a 33 gtst let aolne a modern performance car like the new gtr

unless of course you just want a quickish cruiser with all the luxo stuff which the m3 does very well

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Means something is not set up right, tune/calibration related.  
    • Finally replaced the previous temporary mesh indicator surrounds (temporary was the last 10+ years 😂) with a 3D printed GTR style version for the front indicators. I think it looks a lot nicer than the old setup and at least the indicators now point in the correct direction rather than angled off. Needed a little bit of tweaking to deal with the intercooler piping but got there in the end. Old and new photos below. 
    • It's weird to me that you say this because I'm pretty sure locals with relatively standard standalone tunes (boost/barometric compensated alpha-N) still have driveability issues when they pop intercooler hoses. Maybe with enough data I can just train some kind of model that spits out an expected grams/cyl given every sensor input except MAF like what FCA did with their Pentastar 3.6 ECU logic. Basically stock everything. The main motivation honestly is to have a sensor that can be a decent baseline source of truth. In scenarios you're describing obviously it won't work every time but it seems to me the number of corner cases that exist in MAF load is maybe not as severe and difficult to manage vs ITB alpha-N with some MAP/barometric compensation.
    • What are your plans for your blow off valves? Purely plumb back? How soft will the spring in them be? AFM can be tricky to get super smooth and nice, especially depending on the rest of the system, and then can be very easily upset if something slightly changes. IE, even if you run recirc blow off valves, you could still see issues getting it to behave at certain load points as turbos might start to spool, but you release the throttle but it's not enough pressure to crack the bov open to recirc, and you can end up with reversion which can cause double metering, and hence dumping of fuel into the system, and stalling the engine.   If you're going to run a map sensor for closed loop boost control from the ECU, what makes you want to keep the AFM?    
    • It's not bad, it's just not flexible. And say if you have any leaks between the MAF and plenum, well then your load axis goes out the window. Here's a real world scenario, I blew off an intercooler hose last track day, as the clamp decided to Bluetooth itself somewhere. Still continued to do 2 laps and drive it to the pub for a couple of beers then home. Good luck doing that with a MAF setup 
×
×
  • Create New...