Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys n gurls,

Ive got myself a blitz SBC i-d III and struggling to get it to work correctly, ive wasted $50 in fuel trying to get it to boost over 9psi!!

Ive got no idea why it is not boosting to a 10psi level which ive consistantly set it for?! It ussually hits 7.6psi - 7.8psi then if I turn off the controller it hits a nice 8.9psi by itself!! Im so very confused why this is happening??

Was I meant to remove anything to let it boost higher than stock?

If anyone can help out would be greatly appreciated! Yes ive checked for leaks, and yes the boost lines are designed for boost and not stretching a great deal under presure?!

Help me!! Thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/189753-blitz-sbc-not-reaching-set-boost/
Share on other sites

Have you got it on Auto or Manual mode?

Try moving the gain up a little, I think standard it is 5, it can go a lot higher, but it is sensitive, move by 2 at a time. If it doesn't change anything by 10 then I'd look at your plumbing. Try using manual and setting the gain to 8 - 10 then moving the level or whatever it's called up to 60 or 65. Only move in small steps.

I trust you have completely removed the plumbing from the original boost controller?

I use Manual. Setting = Level 60, gain = 6.

Auto set to 10psi, usually boosts to 9.8 or so, but not as quickly as manual mode.

intake is colder when your car is hence why it boosts harder.

Even in auto set at about 12psi the stupid thing wont boost past 9psi.

I will give the manual setting a go again, however I can reach 9psi with a setting of 7 Gain and 17ratio, go figure?!

I think it must be the length of my plumbing, its mounted in my air box (solanoid that is) so I guess the trail back to the controller is a lil far but I didnt think it would cause it a problem?!

May I add it only hits 9psi on top speed run 140km/h for eg.. and 8.9 turned off just in 1-2-3rd? to about 80km/h??

Edited by DECIM8

My stock boost sensor was still connected, when I removed it then engine light came on like its meant to when you install these little buggers, perhaps this was skipped?? because we were expecting it to light up :S

Will it be ok with the sensor removed? gauges still work which is found interesting.

Edited by DECIM8

Firstly I have an R33.

I already had a manual bleed valve fitted which was not plumbed into my factory boost controller. So although the solenoid id still electronically connected it is not plumbed into any piping. My twin solenoids from Blitz are mounted on the strut tower next to the factory one using one of those bolts on that bracket. Then it uses the stock plumbing points (R34 intercooler) for the solenoid, with the one going to the original blocked off.

The boost on the dash on the R33 is read from the back of the plenum to a electronic boost sensor near the brake cylinder. So it will read even when the solenoid is disconnected.

My idea is to raise the ratio to 40 or 50, with gain at 6 or 7.

Using manual .. I pull hardest for some strange reason when im setting it at about 17 ratio and 6-7 gain which I find rather strange for people pulling a good 60ratio like above!!

Its just not working for me .. its like the stock system is still running .. maybe its been installed incorrectly.

Using manual .. I pull hardest for some strange reason when im setting it at about 17 ratio and 6-7 gain which I find rather strange for people pulling a good 60ratio like above!!

Its just not working for me .. its like the stock system is still running .. maybe its been installed incorrectly.

hmm, that doesnt sound right i run around 60/70 ratio for 16psi but i am running a largeish aftermarket turbo. also the more gain you use the quicker/harder the boost will come in but the more likly it is to spike

  • 2 weeks later...

Yeah I worked it out mate, the wire had been frayed snapped by the last asshole who sold it to me (G.A Garage) dont buy anything from him btw.. fixed and now boosting hard...

Thanks for all the help

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • One other question, is there a chance that changing the idle speed can lead you down a rabbit hole and is the reason the tuner didn't touch it? Reason I ask is because if that's the reason the tuner avoided it then I probably shouldn't be touching it lol.
    • Pfft. As if I'd ever point a high pressure washer at my car.
    • The nature of my commute has changed. Way back then it was traffic lights all the way, for ~28km. It sucked. When they finally stitched the expressway together I could do a good 15+km of it at a steady 80-100 with no stopping. That alone has gotten me down to flat 10s. Prior to that it was mid-high 10s. I can't remember the delta that I saw when I got the idle down. It was only ~150 rpm, because the idle speed was never terrible, but for the delta in consumption to be noticeable it would have had to have been at least 0.2-0.3 L/100km - which is not to be sneezed at when it comes for absolute free. It's only about 50L per year, but that's ~$100. A few extra pizzas is always welcome. Note that I have a record of every tank of fuel that has ever gone through my car except for a handful put in by someone else, like my mechanic. I can show you the difference between stock RB20 and tuned RB20, stock RB5Neo and tuned, winter and summer fuel blends, winter and summer fuel blends when the ambient temperature is not appropriate for the blend, working O2 sensor, blown O2 sensor, boosting f**k out of it and frightened to boost it because it is pinging, and so on. OK, I probably can't do all that now with 100% clarity - but at the time when any of those things were in event, you could see it in the records. There's 25+ years of simple tank after tank records, so you have to look for landmarks to work out approximately how old any single record is. What's really important is the meta data and that lives in my head.
    • If you're claiming the issues are not skyline specific, then either the USA is living in the 90s / early 2000s, OR you have the issue of "survivor bias". Which is you're mainly hearing and listening to those with terrible experiences, and haven't found the guys who have cars with good decent builds and no problems. It happens in AU too, that plenty of people keep having issues, and they keep going to the workshops that are known to be shit "because I read on the internet". Even worse, are those who keep posting on the internet as though they know for a fact what something is, when they've never touched/looked at said item in their life, and again are making assumptions, based on something they read, or because it's a certain way in other cars. It's even funnier when those same people debate the facts with the people who've lived and breathed this stuff for over 15 years. Example, I've had someone tell me you can't do something with a Skyline, because they read it on the internet, except I can tell they're wrong, as I did that exact thing back in 2008 with my Skyline.
    • The funniest part I saw, was someone would bitch and moan on FB about something, Andy would be the one to respond, asking for more info, if he could contact them, what the engine setup is, what their config file was, and 95% of the responses were people just going "der! It doesn't work" and Andy going "What doesn't work?" And then going "The firmware!" And they'd go around in circles as no one could ever give information, and Haltech couldn't fault things on the bench, (especially when people wouldn't give any specifics).   Many moons ago, when Andy was back at e420c stage, he reached out to me, and asked me to test different plug and play looms for him (already had an e420c in the car on his V1 PNP loom). And he kept asking me, as I was competent enough to be able to give him some specific feedback on what was/wasn't working, how to replicate the faults etc, and work through things with him. Most people are terrible at answering the questions they're asked, or being able to provide quality feedback other than "it doesn't work".
×
×
  • Create New...