Jump to content
SAU Community

353awkw?


fieds83
 Share

Recommended Posts

2a_title.gifspacer.gif■Main Specificationsspacer.gifSpecifications4WDVR38DETTGT-R / GT-R Black edition / GT-R Premium edition•MODELNissan CBA-R35•TRANSMISSION TYPEGR6 Dual Clutch Transmission••DIMENSIONSOverall lengthmm 4655Overall widthmm 1895Overall heightmm 1370Interior dimensions (length x width x height)mm 1750×1475×1095Wheelbasemm 2780Tread Front / Backmm 1590/1600Min. ground clearancemm 110•WEIGHT/CAPACITYCurb weightkg 1740(*1)Seating capacitypersons4(2+2)Gross Vehicle Weightkg 1960(*1)•PERFORMANCEMin. turning radius (curb to curb)m 5.7Fuel consumption rate10-15mode (MLIT screening value)km/L8.2Main Emission Control SystemVariable valve timing•OTHERSDrive system4WDSteeringElectronic controlled power-assist rack and pinionSuspension Front/BackIndependent double wishbone suspension / Independent multi-link suspensionBraking System Front/BackVentilated brake disc / Ventilated brake discTire Size Front/Back255/40ZRF20 97Y / 285/35ZRF20 100Yspacer.gif(*1)When SRS Curtain Airbag System, SRS Side Airbag System for Driver and Front Passenger is installed, curb weight is 1750kg, gross vehicle weight is 1970kg.

•The fuel consumption rate calculated under the given test conditions. The actual fuel consumption rate may differ depending on the condition of the weather, roads, vehicle, driving, maintenance, etc. it is driven under.

•The mode of fuel consumption rates indicated in this specification sheet are all 10-15 mode.spacer.gifspacer.gif■Engine Main Specificationsspacer.gif■Gear Ratio/ Final Drive Ratiospacer.gifModelVR38DETTNo. of cylinders, configurationDOHC/V6Cylinder bore x strokemm95.5x88.4DisplacementL3.799Compression ratio9.0Max. power outputkW(PS)/rpm353(480)/6400Max. torqueNm(kgm)/rpm588(60)/3200-5200Fuel supplyNISSAN EGI (ECCS)

Electronic controlled fuel injection system Recommended fuel/Fuel tank capacityLUnleaded premium gasoline/71 Transmission typeGR6 Dual Clutch TransmissionEngineVR38DETTGear ratio 1st4.056Gear ratio 2nd2.301Gear ratio 3rd1.595Gear ratio 4th1.248Gear ratio 5th1.001Gear ratio 6th0.796Gear ratio Reverse3.383Final drive ratio3.700spacer.gifPlease use the fuel listed as the 'Recommended Fuel' for this vehicle. The use of other fuel types may lead to vehicle trouble or failure. Please note, any trouble or failure caused by the use of other fuel types, will not guaranteed free of charge.spacer.gif•The engine power output values indicated in this catalog are all net power output values.

•Engine power output can be indicated as 'Net power output' or 'Gross power output'. 'Gross' values are estimations of power output of the engine alone. 'Net' values are estimations of when the engine is assembled onto the vehicle. For estimations of the same gasoline engines, 'Net' values are approximately 15% lower than 'Gross' values according to JAMA research.

•Please use unleaded premium gasoline for this vehicle. If unleaded premium gasoline is inaccessible, regular gasoline can also be used, although it may lead to engine power output reduction.

<SI unit conversion value> The unit conversion for converting conventional power output unit 「PS」 and unit for engine torque 「kgm」 to SI unit is as follows. The value is indicated only as and rounded off to the nearest whole number.

1PS=0.7355kW 1kgm=9.80665Nm

Not sure why it did not copy properly but read the comments regarding net and gross power.

http://press.nissan-global.com/PRESSKIT/NI...LISH/index.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

'Net' values are estimations of when the engine is assembled onto the vehicle.

I understand that to mean 353KW at the engine, but once the engine is installed in the car. So its still an at-the-engine figure, but the its not just the engine sitting on an engine dyno.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Net I think just equals BHP at the flywheel the gross HP is before all mechanical losses (theoretical) drive losses wouldn't be much with that setup probably 10%max

I reckon you would probably see 320awkw max :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"gross vehicle weight is 1970kg."

thats my ONLY Criticism with the car. value for money, performance etc - all amazing..but i dont see how this could be flung around a track at a car that weighs more than an AUdi A8....

sure its fast..but imagine how much faster it would be if it were 1400 - 1500kg...it would slay pretty much everything...

even with a "lightweight" version the max they are going to take off it is 100kg (see Superleggera and Scuderia F430 weight reduction)...its still not that much...

it depends..if its a GT Cruiser, that weight is fine...but i dont see many GT Cruisers with engines this small...

still..its getting the numbers...but the weight thing is the only thing bugging me about this car..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"gross vehicle weight is 1970kg."

thats my ONLY Criticism with the car. value for money, performance etc - all amazing..but i dont see how this could be flung around a track at a car that weighs more than an AUdi A8....

sure its fast..but imagine how much faster it would be if it were 1400 - 1500kg...it would slay pretty much everything...

even with a "lightweight" version the max they are going to take off it is 100kg (see Superleggera and Scuderia F430 weight reduction)...its still not that much...

it depends..if its a GT Cruiser, that weight is fine...but i dont see many GT Cruisers with engines this small...

still..its getting the numbers...but the weight thing is the only thing bugging me about this car..

I'm sure you don't understand 'gross weight' means. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Latest Posts

    • That's the most absurd thing I've ever heard. I would go cut bellhousing over that monstrosity of a flywheel all day, every day. It puts a lot more mass further from the last main bearing. I've had nothing but problems with Collins in the past and refuse to ever buy their products again. I would not trust anything they tell you. He's playing his salesman card.  I'm currently at 640whp on a mustang dyno (~770bhp) with the intentions of running E85 and a lot more power this upcoming spring. Cheers, 
    • Nah, it's not the reduced knock margin. It is a direct mechanical effect of having to initiate the combustion earlier, while the piston is still rising, which starts to exert combustion pressure on the rising piston earlier, making the rest of the engine work harder to finish driving the piston up to TDC where the combustion pressure stops being a negative and starts being a positive. Your modern engine that only needs ~10° to make MBT doesn't waste the other 10 or so degrees of crank rotation. That's almost all of it. The difference in knock margin might go either way. Remember that modern engines to which you are currently comparing the long tractor engine (the RB) are now running super high compression, direct injection, tricky cam control and maybe even cylinder pressure sensors. You're not comparing apples with other fruit. It's apples and sea weed, or some other evolutionarily primitive vegetation. And remember, squish only really comes into play at the very end of the stroke. It certainly does good things, but it is not the biggest contributor to what's going on. It is quite possibly much less important in 4 valve head than 2 valvers also, because there is so much less squish available to a 4 valve anyway.
    • Food for thought, a longer stroke motor would need less ignition timing vs. a shorter stroke motor requiring more ignition timing.
    • Thanks Duncan, HART is only 10 mins from me (I did my bike license there), it'd be awesome if it ran these types of things.  Sutton Road does look good and they take fewer cars than SMSP which is good.  Surely you have enough land to lay a few million tonnes of concrete and some sprinklers D? 
    • I thought an engine that needs more ignition timing to make power is going to result in less power due to reduced knock margin? More time for the combustion to propagate -> more time for it to heat up the rest of the mix to detonation.
×
×
  • Create New...