Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The bore is the same for the Rb25, 26 and 30. The diff is the stroke between the three.

It is posible. The rb30 Crank is nitred. I remeber reading something about the rb25 geodgen pins sitting higher (hence lower CR) than on the rb30 pistons. You could use all the rb30 internals in the block. Not sure about this. But definately worth looking into.

There are stroker kits available.. but for stupid amounts of money! And for turbo applications..

Pretty much the easiest, cheapest and best is to just do an RB30DE conversion. Its not a bad NA conversion for all of ~$500 or ~$1200 if you want a good basis for a solid NA car..

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/t186051.html

Thats my plans.. Run down on pg 2

Can someone shed some light on if it is possible to put RB30 Internals into an RB25 block?.. Saves A SHITLOAD of work for me.. Its an interesting option. Saves me the legalities of swapping from a 2.5 to 3L, front diff adaptor, VCT piping, timing belt, relocation of pullies..

lol.. sorry for hijacking your thread.. but its an interesting prospect!

Edited by GTS4WD
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/191153-rb25de-build/#findComment-3441221
Share on other sites

np u can hijack.........person i was speaking to wasnt sure if the 30 rods or 26 had to be used,

i have to get in contact with hioctaneracing andget actual details. As u said it saves the hassle of blue slips and stuff that would be required with the engine swap, was considering supercharging it so it would be an Rb28des..............food for thought!!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/191153-rb25de-build/#findComment-3441511
Share on other sites

If you want to increase Capacity, as before, RB30DE is the easiest.

You can use the whole rb30 bottom end, crank, rods etc. etc.

There is a .pdf file floating around, I can send you it if needed. Its a clear and simple build of an RB30DET. Which can easily be used to make an RB30DE

Just a thought, If you use an RB30 crank, rb25 rods and pistons, and you get a 2.8L.. the other 200cc's must be atributed to the rb25 geodgen pin sits higher towards the top of the piston compaired to the rb30 which sits further away from the face of the piston?

I dunno.. just an idea.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/191153-rb25de-build/#findComment-3441778
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's a good point. The rears of the covers themselves have no baffling at all though. Higher up more chance of air for venting the crank case. Lower on the side more likely to be submerged. I might be able to fit them on the sides but with both the sump drain fittings being on the drivers side the passenger one will need to make a U Turn and be nearer the turbo. But it will look neat being not up on top.
    • It won't likely matter where along the cam covers you put the big fittings. I would suggest putting them on the sides if you can, simply because it will reduce the flow up through the baffles and thus reduce the amount of oil that gets put into the foam. It might not matter, but it seems like something to consider as a worthwhile thing to avoid.
    • Well, I have my IM240 results with a cammed LS1... My Nox was 0.11 and my CO g/km was 0.2. Euro4 is 0.08 and 0.1 respectively. I'm gonna say for a stock RB this is actually plausible, BUT in Australia they were complied pre-Euro2, so the limits were: Which as you can see, is way higher. I'd say a stock RB with a new OEM Cat could? actually pass Euro4 for NOX but you'd probably have to do a hell of a lot of testing to prove it, and getting a car emissions tested and carrying a certificate of emissions when/if you get pulled over may be cost prohibitive if it's even allowable to get your car tested and re-classified. You'd have to find out what the UK Govt is using as reference material. It may be non-negotiable.
    • I made a little more progress last night and added some E85 safe fuel tank baffle foam in behind the stock cam cover baffle plate.  It still feels really wrong shoving foam inside the engine but apparently its fine based on it pretty much being the MINES/Hi-Octane RB26 cam baffle kit and the few posts here I have found of people doing it and the lack of posts saying the foam broke down and ruined the motor... Still plan to check it frequently though lol The last step for this round of oil control modifications I plan to make is to add some -12AN fittings to the cam covers and connect them to some (already existing luckily) -12AN fittings on the sump. Basically a sudo head drain/sump breather/pressure equaliser without having to remove the motor and do the one on the rear of the head. My plan is to add them to either the tops or the sides of the cam covers at the back. unless there is a compelling reason to have them at the front on the sides which i have seen a few times though they were all on RB26 cam covers from memory so that may be due to the stock breathers being on the back and the integral baffle being different ?    
×
×
  • Create New...