Jump to content
SAU Community

The R35 Gt-r - Is It Part Of The Skyline Legacy?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

for all those people who say it doesnt have a RB26... farrrrrrk. The original GTR never had an RB26, so does that mean the RB26 should never have been used.

Its called development, and its a great thing.

Lets be honest, the RB26 was a good engine, but imagine what can happen now interms or response and torque. Lets be honest, turbo torque is quite useless. Never there where you want it. RB26 showed this quite well. My mate was going through a round about with a R33 GTR and a clean away truck didnt see him. Put the foot down and got stuck in a whole lot of RB26 lag and zero torque. The GTR got creamed lol.

Lets hope the 3.8 responds better!

Edited by Granthem

Yeah, that's true, although only m/seconds - the RB engines have a lot of turbo lag... don't know why... it's powerful etc, but laggy.

Damn, I am still trying to wake up to the fact the the Skyline, V35 is now a granny car... fark me dead will ya...

Yeah, that's true, although only m/seconds - the RB engines have a lot of turbo lag... don't know why... it's powerful etc, but laggy.
uhhhh... turbo lag is caused by the turbo used, not the engine.
its a GTR, not a skyline. the skyline's gone back to being the regular passenger car that it started out being in the 60's.
the GT-R when originally launched in 1989 was never intended for your average 20 year old on P's to be hooning around in. it was the refined sports car for the older, mature 30 to 40 year old japanese family man. The new GTR is targetted at exactly the same market this time too.

I was under the impression the first skylines came out at the end of the 50's, the first GT-Rs came out in the late 60's and stopped in the earlly 70's. As for the 'family man' thing, didnt they also made a 4 door GT-R back in the day?

I personally think the Skyline Legacy Died after the DR30 RSX-C. R31 onwards seem to conventional in my personal opinion. I expect a skyline to be a pig of a car. mind you the next skyline I want to add to the stable is the 32 GT-R cos I have a thing for them too and the fact im not rich and I can only dream of owning something Pre R30 and with a GT-R or GT-ES Badge

for all those people who say it doesnt have a RB26... farrrrrrk. The original GTR never had an RB26, so does that mean the RB26 should never have been used.

Its called development, and its a great thing.

Lets be honest, the RB26 was a good engine, but imagine what can happen now interms or response and torque. Lets be honest, turbo torque is quite useless. Never there where you want it. RB26 showed this quite well. My mate was going through a round about with a R33 GTR and a clean away truck didnt see him. Put the foot down and got stuck in a whole lot of RB26 lag and zero torque. The GTR got creamed lol.

Lets hope the 3.8 responds better!

man there's some misunderstanding about the difference between 'lag' and the boost threshold of an engine

the GT-R engine with standard turbos doesn't have much 'lag' at all- crack the throttle, and almost instantly the boost gauge will swing into positive pressure, even at low revs, showing that the turbos have a very good transient response time. the fact that they need to have some revs on board to make substantial boost and pull hard is no surprise when you combine a smallish capacity with a short stroke design.

i'm sure if he was in 1st gear he would have escaped ;) (or 2nd for a bigger roundabout)

of course the R35 will have every petrol turbo engine Nissan has ever made completely whipped for low end torque- just look at the specs: 1.2 litres more capacity than a 26, 9.0:1 comp ratio, VVT, variable intake runners, and turbos about the same size as those on the old R34 engines anyway (they look to be)

R32 engine ~ 353Nm @ 4400rpm

R35 engine ~ 588Nm from 3200 to 5200rpm. that's what i call a tractable turbo engine :) (now they just need to pinch some VATN turbs from Porsche :()

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Good morning all, Bit of a random question but figured I’d finally throw it out after wondering for a long while. Before I start, I'm hoping to do this purely out of personal preference. I think it would look better at night, and don't mind at all spending a few hours and dollars to get it done. I've copied this from a non-Skyline specific forum, so I apologize for the explanation of our headlight switch setup that we all know. Here we go: Zero lights (switch off) Parking lights (switch position 1) being a rectangular marker on the outside of the housing, my low beam being the projector in the centre (position 2), and a high beam triggered by my turn signal stalk. Most North American cars I’ve owned of this era have power to the amber corner (turning indicator) light as part of the first switch (parking lights). I’d love to have these amber corners receive power when the headlights and parking lights are on (headlight switch), yet still blink when using the turn signal which is of course a separate switch. Hopefully I’ve explained my question correctly. Is anyone aware of a way in which I might be able to achieve this? Thanks in advance
    • My heads are cathedral port! It's likely possible, but I don't want to add any extra moving parts (I know they don't move) between the heads, manifolds, etc. It will also affect how injectors/fuel rails etc sit and I don't really know if it would change how the FAST manifold goes/sits/fits. I have the LS6 steam pipes already as I have a very late LS1 block so it should be fine. I couldn't find anyone who had ever actually used one for this purpose, it seems 100% of people grind the water pump. The thermal spacers are 12mm and are half way to the cost of the newer water pump anyhow... so if it comes to that I suppose I'd rather buy a new pump. The bearing in the pump I do have is a little.. clunky, but it hasn't done that much time and I never noticed it when the car was together in the past few years, so..
    • The bushing has failed, not all that uncommon for a car of this age.  Any mechanic should be able to push in a new bushing for you, or you can probably buy the entire lower control arm, complete with bushes.
    • Could you not use "thermal" spacers to give the clearance, like the ones I used between the blower and head? That raised the manifold height by around 10-15mm Albeit the ones I used were for cathedral ports, but I assume they have similar for rectangular ports????
    • Thanks Paul I reached out to Autotainment but they no longer work on JDM cars as the guy who used to do the work moved on and is no longer doing that kind of work. I am talking with Level Up Audio though.
×
×
  • Create New...