Jump to content
SAU Community

Crysis


Boostzor
 Share

Recommended Posts

there is a hack to get most of the dx10 effects to work in xp, here is the link.

www.crysis-online.com/forum/index.php?topic=11837.0#msg203789

i got it to work on my system (core2 e6700, 3gb ddr2, 8800gtx) it looks really really good.

here are some comparisons screens that i took.

dx9

dx9rocks.jpg

dx10

dx10rocks.jpg

dx9

dx9light.jpg

dx10

dx10light.jpg

got more if you want to see them

Edited by vladau
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I got the DX10 version of the demo running from the X64 bin file, so 64bit and DX10 in Vista 64bit and it's amazing!!!

I've got it set to low though becuase my 8600GTS sucks :)

has anyone else thought of getting an 8800GT the new one thats just come out? and is much faster than all versions of the 8800GTS and just a margin off the 8800GTX?

i like the way in the DX10 version you can shoot trees with the boat and they fall over and crush things, man I'm buying it too :D

Seriously a good reason to upgrade to Vista if only for this game, or you could do the patch thing above

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i like the way in the DX10 version you can shoot trees with the boat and they fall over and crush things, man I'm buying it too :)

that happens in the dx9 version as well, also you can shoot a tree with anything and it will fall over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm getting a 64 bit vista version atm, just bought a new pc and damn xp can't take over 2gb ram + i'm sick of the same old blue screen bs

you guys reckon i will have any chance of running this on medium with 4 gb ddr2 800mhz, asus M2N-E Sli and the 6000+ dual core with only a 256mb 7600GT card? Cards are insanely expensive, a 8800gtx costs the same price as the pc cost me (450)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm getting a 64 bit vista version atm, just bought a new pc and damn xp can't take over 2gb ram + i'm sick of the same old blue screen bs

you guys reckon i will have any chance of running this on medium with 4 gb ddr2 800mhz, asus M2N-E Sli and the 6000+ dual core with only a 256mb 7600GT card? Cards are insanely expensive, a 8800gtx costs the same price as the pc cost me (450)

it should be able to run it on medium (depending on what res you have it set at). the only thing holding you pc back is the video card, the 8800gt should be out over here soon and it should be fairly cheap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm, do you think it's worth my while buying:

640M 8800GTS Generic/Leadtek/Gigabyt /ASUS $452/$489/$499/$499

Or i should just wait for this 8800GT to come out?

defiantly wait for the 8800gt they are way better than the gts and almost as good as the gtx, and also they should be cheaper than the gts when they come out in a week or 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Game looks off tap, especially in the scenes when everyone is talking, faces look real as, my pc runs it ok on medium graphics and can sorta manage on high but, definitely will need a new graphics card to use FSAA and high res on medium, high/very high settings (i ran mine on medium with 1024X768 and high on 800X600 high was pretty laggy at parts)

Only problem is the crosshair.. when u zoom if you have iron sights instead of accuracy sights selected (default u do) it's really hard to shoot, even if u line up the little aim thingo on the gun

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8800 GT's are already out. A client has two of em in SLi and he says they are freaking fast.

THey will be hard to get though as the new 9xxx series is out soonish. So if you see one grab it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

awesome game! absolutely crazyyyyy graphics and physics and I love how you get different powers using the suit's modes. Amazing scenery and its pretty fun to play... pretty much same as Far Cry was.

As for performance... well I tried running 1920x1680 (my monitor's natural resolutaion) with all quality details maxed out to Very High including anti-aliasing 16X however it was running fairly choppy. So I turned the Anti-Aliasing to 4x and set details to High and it ran smooth, while still looking incredible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im sorry,

this game is shit, way over hyped.

play the demo b4 you waste money on it or get the cracked version.

how can you say its shit

ofcourse its a cracked version - bloody dual layer DVD isos

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This games too nuts graphic wise methinks, i was looking at it ran on High settings (not very high) with 4XAA and the 8800GT was struggling, hit a low of 10 FPS, and that's like one of the best cards around (are a few better tho)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Latest Posts

    • As someone who has been playing with turbo things for some time now, be prepared for this to not be the first time feeling this way    I'm busy as atm, but if no one else covers the things I'm realising are worth mentioning to you then I will when I have a chance as it seems like I overestimated your knowledge on how turbos and wastegates work.  Otherwise I recommend having a look around how wastegates and boost control work, really anything on understanding the general mechanism of boost control as it will help you find the answers to the questions you're looking for.  Your initial question jumps some fundamentals.
    • I don't understand anything anymore.
    • so this is an anomaly??? I thought it was a voluntary increase
    • we can only guess exactly what happened from our keyboards, but to me it looks like they were targeting 27 but the wastegate was too small or poorly controlled and the boost crept up, that is quite common
    • Good points!  Took those for granted - though I *did* actually give an example of winding boost up more than it had been before where I wasn't actually specifically looking for more peak power.  The Toyota Starlet dyno plot that I shared and mentioned showed an overlay from the previous tune it had and the one I'd redone, I left the boost targetting the same as the old tune but then after peak power I ramped boost up by a good 5psi or so over what the old tune had at the same rpm. The reason I felt comfortable with this (though the owner of the car had a "are you sure?" moment when I suggested it) is that the setup wasn't turbo limited, it was largely head sealing limited and the owner was a bit concerned as for the last few seasons he'd had issues with head lifting - sometimes not completing an event without having some headgasket issue, so he didn't want to run any more boost than it was. The reasons I was ok with raising the boost a good 5+psi MORE than that was that I left it where it was in the middle, and only increased it where VE (and therefore cylinder pressure vs psi) were dropping hard and I didn't stop the torque from dropping, just reduced the drop.  Well, there is that and the fact that the previous tuner had it overtimed by near 7degrees at peak torque - but that's another story haha.    I didn't really go into detail about that "turning it up more" thing but now you've mentioned the "not detuning", sometimes the boost *can* be turned up higher than you'd expect if the setup allows for it and you do it smartly.  I've tuned things to run 30psi on BP98 "safely" that a few years ago (or still?) people would cry that it was a stupid idea - but given they were well intercooled, low EMAP turbos and only doing that kind of boost where VE is dropping etc I was pretty confident it wasn't as cowboy as it sounded at face value and we never ended up with issues as a result of it.     
×
×
  • Create New...