Jump to content
SAU Community

Do You Dislike The R35 Gt-r?


d00dz
 Share

R35 GTR  

156 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

To be honest, I think it looks brilliant.

And moreso, I think it will look absolutely incredible in real life.

Personally, I havent bought much into the hype until recently, and I really think its exceeded my expectations...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i reckon its looks nuts and the mechanical package is out of this world and to be faster than a 300k 911 turbo for half the price what can i say nissan have outdone them selves yet again :)

ps to the muppets on here that are crying that it doesnt have a clutch or manual box im pretty sure the engineers know more than anyone on this forum and if it needed a manual boc they would have used that instead my 0.02 worth

Link to comment
Share on other sites

great looking car...a little different than some of the prototypes..but appealing..I would say..a cross between a GT Porsche and the last RX7.

Now just a quick question..is this a 4 seater?

Have not seen one shot of the rear seats so I am guessing its a 2...

Anyways...if it is a 2...the only thing I don't like is the weight its dragging around.

Other than that..as all here have said..well done Nissan for the great mechanical and performance package they have put together,go Gtr..Porsche killers...

Enough said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen alot of comments on various websites where people are whingin' and bitchin' about its weight ect, No manual...Blah Blah Blah

Give it 5 years, once the tuners have had a good crack at it, and your talking about a car thats gonna continue GTR's dominating legacy.

Its just a waiting game from now until the point of buying them for $70 grand a piece and throwing on some crazy turbos and boosting an already awesome car.

Now Carlos....Get cracking at another one! :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now just a quick question..is this a 4 seater?

Have not seen one shot of the rear seats so I am guessing its a 2...

Anyways...if it is a 2...the only thing I don't like is the weight its dragging around.

Are you kidding this pics been around for ages:

post-6243-1193958762_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its the feel and control of a manual gearbox that makes it the no.1 choice in a sports car.. who gives a f^uk about 0.2sec gear changes when you have a clutch. People who choose a clutchless gearbox in a sports car (for street use) can't drive and/or are too scared to drive a manual IMO.

The new gtr doesn't give you the choice, so that's it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think someone should make a poll to see who is sick of the same threads popping up again and again regarding the new gt-r.

i think that'd be good.

sorry i've had a shit week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its the feel and control of a manual gearbox that makes it the no.1 choice in a sports car.. who gives a f^uk about 0.2sec gear changes when you have a clutch. People who choose a clutchless gearbox in a sports car (for street use) can't drive and/or are too scared to drive a manual IMO.

The new gtr doesn't give you the choice, so that's it.

You go girl.

cs-2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's the most absurd thing I've ever heard. I would go cut bellhousing over that monstrosity of a flywheel all day, every day. It puts a lot more mass further from the last main bearing. I've had nothing but problems with Collins in the past and refuse to ever buy their products again. I would not trust anything they tell you. He's playing his salesman card.  I'm currently at 640whp on a mustang dyno (~770bhp) with the intentions of running E85 and a lot more power this upcoming spring. Cheers, 
    • Nah, it's not the reduced knock margin. It is a direct mechanical effect of having to initiate the combustion earlier, while the piston is still rising, which starts to exert combustion pressure on the rising piston earlier, making the rest of the engine work harder to finish driving the piston up to TDC where the combustion pressure stops being a negative and starts being a positive. Your modern engine that only needs ~10° to make MBT doesn't waste the other 10 or so degrees of crank rotation. That's almost all of it. The difference in knock margin might go either way. Remember that modern engines to which you are currently comparing the long tractor engine (the RB) are now running super high compression, direct injection, tricky cam control and maybe even cylinder pressure sensors. You're not comparing apples with other fruit. It's apples and sea weed, or some other evolutionarily primitive vegetation. And remember, squish only really comes into play at the very end of the stroke. It certainly does good things, but it is not the biggest contributor to what's going on. It is quite possibly much less important in 4 valve head than 2 valvers also, because there is so much less squish available to a 4 valve anyway.
    • Food for thought, a longer stroke motor would need less ignition timing vs. a shorter stroke motor requiring more ignition timing.
    • Thanks Duncan, HART is only 10 mins from me (I did my bike license there), it'd be awesome if it ran these types of things.  Sutton Road does look good and they take fewer cars than SMSP which is good.  Surely you have enough land to lay a few million tonnes of concrete and some sprinklers D? 
    • I thought an engine that needs more ignition timing to make power is going to result in less power due to reduced knock margin? More time for the combustion to propagate -> more time for it to heat up the rest of the mix to detonation.
×
×
  • Create New...