Jump to content
SAU Community

R35 Gtr - Dual Exhaust Myth & Spotted Cool Features


Recommended Posts

Hey,

Just remember someone saying how it would be expensive to modify the GTR and one of the reasons was it had dual exhausts so would cost twice as much. Basically what im getting at is the illusion that it comes with dual exhausts like a 300zx, looking at the below pic you can see that it goes to a single pipe halfway along and splits again at a T piece near the rear, so its not a true dual exhaust.

This surprised me as I thought they would go a full performance dual exhaust being the performance/supercar car it was built to be, but instead it looks its small and restrictive and not what you'd expect to see on a turbo'd car. Its obviously good / flows enough though for the power it puts out. Anyone else have these thoughts?

Engineanddriveline.jpg

Cheers!

Gagz

PS..Does anyone actually know where it states what type of exhaust it is....diameter (2.5"??), material (titanium??), press bent or mandrel...etc??

Edited by R31 Gagz

when its not mandrel bent there are areas inside the pipe where the air doesn't flow smoothly, and can cause restriction.

afaik the exhaust isn't titanium, which a lot of people have commented on... and are expecting aftermarket companies to come out with full titanium exhausts to drop the weight of the GT-R a little.

Didn't notice the 2 to 1 to 2 layout of the exhaust... maybe we might see straight twin pipe exhaust systems pretty soon... or maybe the underbody layout doesn't allow for seperate pipes? Nissan did say they put a lot of effort into making sure the car was highly aerodynamic.

Thinking something like this:

fulldual_image_003.gif

Keep in mind Nissan would have done its best to cut down on emissions to meet Japan and the US's laws.

I thought it was mentioned somewhere that on the options list will be a titanium exhaust, reducing the weight by 10-15kg.

Most likely will be standard on the "V-spec" and up...

i think this was on the edmunds site

man, soooo many cool things still to come from this car. JGTC, V-spec and more hardcore versions, Nismo versions, tuning house versions (Mines), all the aftermarket goodies... exciting times :P

EDIT: tread pattern on those tyres are really interesting...

looks like the exhaust is the easiest way to gain another 30-40kw? :P

I would bet my money on a "chip" or ECU reprograming to be most cost-effective performance gain for the new GTR. Look at two other modern twin turbo 6 engines; 997 Turbo gets an extra 50-55kw from a software and a Chiptorque piggyback can give a BMW 335i an extra 35kw at the wheels!

Whats the secret? You know it. BOOST, FUEL and TIMING. Changing exhaust on these cars do help but not as much as a software.

Remember this GTR was built without "the gentlemens agreement" in mind. I would expect the factory exhaust to be quite free flowing but relatively muted in sound.

353kw isnt much power at all.... looks like the exhaust is the easiest way to gain another 30-40kw? :down:

I wouldn't say its not much power at all except in comparison to some very high power cars. I guess that system is good enough for current power but when you want to get serious power, an exhaust upgrade is definitely on the mod shopping list :) If I ever had enough money to get an R35 I would probably upgrade it anyway and maybe the air intakes depending on how good the stock ones are just so it could breathe easier, free up a few kws.

Cheers!

Gagz

this one is nose heavy anyway- the balance is reported to be 58:42

That has to be a typo. Even the average FWD Avagnary has a better weight distriution than that.

I'm thinking more like 48:52. Surely the Nissan engineers couldn't get the weight distribution so horribly wrong. It would handle worse than a 265 Centura.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • looking forward to your t56 swap man its a game changer if it works! 
    • So, when are you trying the new GR86 or BRZ?
    • Uncle Duncan Yeap, FI Interchiller  Works well, normal IAT's cruising with the WTA only went from 50°c+ to 25-30°c with the interchiller  Before, when on it hard, the IAT would see 80-90°c, now, the highest has been was around 38°c IIRC IAT is measured under the blower hat I recommend it for the street or strip where your only on it hard for 10 or so seconds, but it wouldn't be efficient for sustained track use as it would heat soak from the AC turning off or whatever it does during WOT to protect the compressor It really needs the AC running for it to not heat soak and keep the WTA coolant chilled My WTA coolant temps when just cruising is around 2°c
    • Hey Mark...sorry to interrupt your career change to hair dressing... but...did you ever fit the interchiller to the commodore, and if so how was it? And, who made it?
    • I've been pondering this, I really enjoy the convertible thing, for me, it's like riding a motorbike, without all the issue of riding a motorbike, mainly, my old sore arthritic joints getting beaten up, and, being able to do it in shorts and a T-shirt and not needing a helmet and all the other gear required, especially like wearing jackets and pants in the summer, or needing 6 layers of cloths in the winter, or not having wet weather gear handy when your 100km away from home on the bike when it decides to start raining As for the hard top and its Coupe look, whilst I do lose all that open top feeling that I really enjoy, from my experience with the NB with a detachable hard top, the cabin is a much nicer place to be, the difference in noise for one, a hard top quietens down the interior, alot, with the soft top up or down it's pretty noisy, which, after 5 or so hours, can get tiring But, as you stated, the detachable hard top totally changes the look of the car, in a really good way, and for me, the look of a detachable hard top is so much better than the PRHT which looks more like a after thought with its weird bulbous rear roof line For me, the minimal effort of putting in on, or storing it after removing it, is well worth the time and effort for the look alone And yes, I'm sure the next owner will be grateful for it as well.......  
×
×
  • Create New...