Jump to content
SAU Community

R35 Gtr - Dual Exhaust Myth & Spotted Cool Features


Recommended Posts

Well, moving a 50kg lump of a gearbox to the rear will change the weight distribution by around 3-4 % points each way (eg take it from 58:42 to about 55:45). Also, the new engine is all alloy, compared to the RB26 lump which was reknowned for being one seriously heavy piece of hardware.

I didn't say that GTR's aren't nose heavy. I'm just staggered that they achieved such poor weight distribution despite all their efforts to move weight to the back.

Didn't notice the 2 to 1 to 2 layout of the exhaust... maybe we might see straight twin pipe exhaust systems pretty soon... or maybe the underbody layout doesn't allow for seperate pipes? Nissan did say they put a lot of effort into making sure the car was highly aerodynamic.

If its not available as an option, it'll surely be available in the aftermarket sooner rather than later.

That exhaust path is almost identical to the FM platform cars (Z33, V35), although for the FM platform since they're both NA you get better midrange by linking the two exhaust streams into one. Which is why even the Nismo catbacks on these cars still link into a single midpipe.

They paid a lot of time on aero on the FM cars as well (the Z33 has a 0.29 Cd, and while it doesn't run an undercarriage plate like current Porsches they did try and make sure it was as flat as possible) - I don't think there's much difference when the aftermarket guys started running "true dual" exhausts on the cars.

I am really surprised the GT-R doesn't run true dual. I would have thought, at its exhaust gas flow, it would have been mandatory.

That has to be a typo. Even the average FWD Avagnary has a better weight distriution than that.

I'm thinking more like 48:52. Surely the Nissan engineers couldn't get the weight distribution so horribly wrong. It would handle worse than a 265 Centura.

That's closer to 50:50 than the FM platform cars, which are 53:47. They still handle alright.

Nissan, with the kudos that the V35 and the Z33 have earned, might have "learnt their lesson" from those cars and continued to make cars with a slight front bias. With AWD traction it doesn't need the weight over the rear tyres for traction like other supercars (most Ferraris, MR or FR, as well as obviously Porsches have a major rear weight bias).

The mentality with the FM weight distribution, apparently, is that when you're not accelerating there's slightly more weight over the front wheels, which gives more traction to your steering tyres, but as you throttle out the weight goes 50:50 which gives you better rear end grip while not unloading the front so much that it starts to lose front traction and start to understeer.

I've found that their theory hasn't been too bad. If you run the same sized tyres front and rear on a Z33, the balance is pretty good for a heavy car using a GT suspension setup. Its hard to say if its better than 50:50, since the only car with that weight distribution that I've gotten to punt around long term is a 318i....which is a nugget.

Also spotted this, what do you think those hoops either side of the bonnet latch on the underside of the bonnet are??

Im thinking built in bonnet locks, like the aftermarket bonnet pins people put on for high speed racing.

small-12mm-silver-bonnet.jpg

Cheers!

Gagz

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My take on gg2 48mm, 54mm, 58mm, and 62mm compressor map for same size compressor vs gg1 : All gg2 only outflow gg1 above 20 psi. As all g gen 2 surge line at lower left of comp map move to the right, all gg2 sacrifice spool vs same size gg1, surge line move to the right worst for 54mm gg2. So for same size compressor if you want best response, use gg1, if you want max hp at >20psi use gg2 but you will be laggier vs same size gg1. Max compressor efficiency drops to max 75% on all gg2 vs max 76%-80% of same size gg1. Iirc lower efficiency means hotter iat less dense air so lower hp at same operating point of comp map. Also curious why gg2 is mapped to lower max rpm vs same size gg1 (only 48mm size both gg1 gg2 mapped to same rpm) : 54mm gg1 165,000 rpm  vs  gg2 160,000 rpm. 58mm gg1 150,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000rpm. 62mm gg1 145,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000 rpm. If gg2 can safely spin to gg1 rpm then they can flow a bit more than as mapped. Good thing that all gg 2 interchange compressor and turbine housings with same size gg 1. So gg1 owners can buy gg2 chra only if planning to boost >20psi.
    • My stuff is all with Shannon's, granted, I don't really have imports I'm driving on the road, however, I've had multiple cars at the same time with them. Presently we have the Landcruiser on laid up cover, Sarah's Kluger on full cover, and the house insured. About 18 months ago Sarah wrote her Subaru Liberty GTB off, insured with Shannon's, and the payout, and buy back of the wreck was super quick. In 2020 we had the VF Commodore totalled in a major hailstorm. Storm was on the Saturday, I called on the Sunday and lodged it, vehicle was towed on Tuesday night, assessment team called on Wednesday to say it was a total loss and get payout details, money was in the bank on Thursday morning. Have had a few other claims both at fault, and not at fault, over the years, and never had an issue with them.   Funnily enough, they're also the cheapest insurer I find for things like Sarah's Kluger.   I will say I'm less impressed dealing with them lately around "the experience", as a lot of their staff that you deal with aren't car enthusiasts. Shannon's has a much more main stream feel ever since they decided to become "big corporate", laid a heap of staff off, and then hired a bunch of non enthusiasts. At the same time they've been making a push to be less "call us and we'll personally have someone who cares help" to "hey, this computer can do stuff for you" and are trying to get more square pegs to fit round holes. (That's just the vibe I get from them). Again, have had no issues with claims with them, but get a bit of a "less personal" feel from them.
    • A thing I wasn’t happy with with enthusiast was during the initial phone call they told me they’d insure it for 130k but needed photos.   I then sent them photos and they told me $80k as there were other cars either similar modifications available for around that price, I told them to send me the links to said cars so that I can buy them. i then sent the modification list with prices of the parts (no labor) and the price then came to 115k, which is still shy of the 130 that was agreed in the initial phone call 
    • Ask me a bit later this week before payday
    • I agree that delayed payment probably isn't the most suitable solution. It seems a solid complete transaction would be best. As I wouldn't be using this sale as a line of credit that would typically earn interest, we can probably arrange a much cleaner single transaction deal. I can do $92.52 today. Would you prefer EFT, or Cash on Pickup?  😛
×
×
  • Create New...