Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey everyone whats up got a wideband problem and wanted to see if anyone on here could help me out. Car is a 95 gts-t mods are pod filter with cai, fmic, 3.5" turbo back exhaust with split dump no cat, boosted up to 12 psi, stock ecu and turbo with afc neo. Ok here is the prob got a PLX wideband O2 SENSOR installed the O2 sensor in the decat pipe wired it up correctly and everything got power and the instructions stated that no calibration is needed but if you let it get warm takes 45 sec and it is exposed just to normal air the display should read air did that and air appeared on the display. Now here is the dilemna ct the car on let it get warm reset my afc neo cause Im thinking all is good and I'll be able to tune the afr's myself so I let the car get to normal operating temp took a look at my display and it reads 19 now Im cruisn at 1500 rpm to try and get the afr's right for that rpm and the display says lean and the more gas I put in the the richer it gets but i set the afc neo to +50 and the lowest afr I got was 14.5 I think!!!! What the hell is goin on. I thought skylines with stock ecu ran rich why are my afr's so lean at cruise and I did it at idle and the same thing nothing below 14.5 WHEN I have added +50% on the afc neo and when I set it back to 0 it shows lean. Can any1 help?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/191844-wideband-o2-sensor-not-worth-a-fk/
Share on other sites

Possibly try and recalibrate with the o2 sensor out of the exhaust.

On cruise your stock o2 sensor and ecu should have the mixtures fairly close to 14.5, even with a few mods. Have you got bigger injectors which may be a bit laggier than the stockers?

Possibly try and recalibrate with the o2 sensor out of the exhaust.

On cruise your stock o2 sensor and ecu should have the mixtures fairly close to 14.5, even with a few mods. Have you got bigger injectors which may be a bit laggier than the stockers?

So you can't really tune at cruising cus what I was trying to do was tune the car to get the afr a bit lean at cruise, no I have stock injectors, still it doesn't explain why the wideband would read lean at idle and lean on the wide ban is anything over 20 there is no possible way for me to be that lean at idle with the stock ecu and no tune and like I state I had the afc neo to the max which is +50% and the afr's went to 14.5 at idle. Could the distance of the wideband O2 senor affect readings cus I have it right before the decat pipe.

sensor is too hot. i get a similar probem on mine when the sensor gets to hot. and there is no point trying to tune a safc on low revs/cuising or idle because the car goes into closed loop and "tunes" itself.

sensor is too hot. i get a similar probem on mine when the sensor gets to hot. and there is no point trying to tune a safc on low revs/cuising or idle because the car goes into closed loop and "tunes" itself.

Is there any fix for the sensor getting to hot? Also how can it be if the max heat for the sensor is 850 C?

there are some very specific guidelines to follow and take note of when using a wideband 02 sensor

the main ones i can think of is

mount the sensor in the right position (location and the way it faces)

the sensor must always have power when running

be closest to the turbo outlet as possible

that being said ive had a wideband sensor up my exhaust muffle and it worked fine

there are some very specific guidelines to follow and take note of when using a wideband 02 sensor

the main ones i can think of is

mount the sensor in the right position (location and the way it faces)

the sensor must always have power when running

be closest to the turbo outlet as possible(I thought it ad to be at least 24 inches away from the outlet for accurate readings at least thats what the instructions said)

that being said ive had a wideband sensor up my exhaust muffle and it worked fine

After reading that I think I figured out the problem the a$$hole that welded the bung for my O2 sensor placed the O2 sensor in the bung and it was in there for a week or so with no power to it while the car ran its daily errands. So I think the O2 senor is destroyed, damnit and I just bout it, Man guess I gatta shell a couple more bucks out for another wideband O2 sensor.

After reading that I think I figured out the problem the a$$hole that welded the bung for my O2 sensor placed the O2 sensor in the bung and it was in there for a week or so with no power to it while the car ran its daily errands. So I think the O2 senor is destroyed, damnit and I just bout it, Man guess I gatta shell a couple more bucks out for another wideband O2 sensor.

double check but i remember reading that having the sensor in the exhaust and no power certainly can kill it

then wideband sensor i had in my car was hard run off the battery terminals so you couldnt cut the power to it

this also made sure the sensor was heated up correctly

double check but i remember reading that having the sensor in the exhaust and no power certainly can kill it

then wideband sensor i had in my car was hard run off the battery terminals so you couldnt cut the power to it

this also made sure the sensor was heated up correctly

So even at ignition off your sensor was still on even when you took the key out your sensor would still be on?

yes this is correct, as its a portable wideband sensor kit and not a permenant one it was setup to be temporarily setup like this on your car

so that it ran as soon as the earth terminal was connected. instead of being say on a cigarette lighter plug that could be bumped or unplugged they chose to direct hard wire it.

if you run the sensor in the exhaust stream and it looses power you risk frying the sensor, hence the hard wire method so it cant "loose" power

only took about 30 seconds to install

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...