Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

it must have been the other one mine is as above. easy mistake. concidering no one has seen my car. its nothing special anyway.

I saw your car on Nicklin Way near Kawana shops on the weekend (Sunday me thinks) at around 6pm-ish... I tooted as I came up along side you, but I took a left straight after... your car looked quite good. :(

I saw your car on Nicklin Way near Kawana shops on the weekend (Sunday me thinks) at around 6pm-ish... I tooted as I came up along side you, but I took a left straight after... your car looked quite good. :rofl:

yeah sorry i didnt see you, thanks for posting, yeah every 1 says my car looks tidy, but what i meant by its nothing special is it doesnt have major mods or anything. not that i dont like the car. no one that isnt from the coast has really seen my car bcoz ive never been to any club days or anything, always to busy or broke.

Saw a black 33 with green stripes on the bonnet on loganlea rd. I think it was 666dan's mate. We were in the silver 32.

And on the way home, a yellow 34 also on loganlea road. Very nice!

Saw a dark blue 33 with green stripes on the bonnet on loganlea rd. I think it was 666dan's mate. We were in the silver 32.

And on the way home, a yellow 34 also on loganlea road. Very nice!

Saw firefrog driving along mains rd Sunnybank hills towards sunnybank...i was headed the opposite direction :)

Er, are you sure? I havent been down mains rd in a while, and if it was today, Ive been at work all day, there is another GT-T getting around like mine, I've seen it going down Logan Rd, thought someone had stolen mine :)

Saw 2 34's within 100m of each other on Grenard Rd. Bayside Blue GT-T, driver said hi. The other one was white, no rear spoiler, GT-T mags, blue badges and no triple gauges...so not sure if it was a GT-T or not? But then again I've got triple gauges and it's not a GT-T :P

Saw 2 34's within 100m of each other on Grenard Rd. Bayside Blue GT-T, driver said hi. The other one was white, no rear spoiler, GT-T mags, blue badges and no triple gauges...so not sure if it was a GT-T or not? But then again I've got triple gauges and it's not a GT-T :P

ya that was me!!! lolll

ya i waved to the white r34 guy,,

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If that's the wiring from the factory, I'd be inspecting the loom everywhere.   Any signs of that anywhere else, and seriously, I'd get rid of the car ASAP before the electrical gremlins make it worthless, or it goes up in flames on its own. That is scary how that insulation is failing!
    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
×
×
  • Create New...