Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have no experience with the engine VR38DETT to you that expectation proved largely true! !

Despite the dramatic difference in STROKER! !

But in terms of the experience of the RB20DET and RB25DET and RB26DETT is better in all respects use or promotion or maintenance or endurance is much better too! ! !

There is no engine V6 6 Slander advantage proved successful only relatively Tourqu be a little better and I say this advantage! ! !

But respects mentioned above inline much better health and days will prove myself! ! Despite the size difference stroker !!!!!!!

NOTE: inline engine only for the 6 slander !! V ENGINE GOOD ON THE V8 ONLY !! OR MORE!!!

Dude, you made my head hurt with that :thumbsup: ... stop using google translation to translate from whatever language you first typed that in.

  • Replies 266
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Nope.. clearly remeber it running somwhere in the 10's

close, found this on the web,

- The Z-tune ran 0-400 meters (a little shorter than a quarter mile) in 10.06 seconds during development.

- NISMO claims a Z-Tune will crush through a quarter-mile in just 10.6 seconds on street tires. That would make it the hardest

accelerating "production" car ever.

whoa bkc :whistling: .... thought id start posting and here would be a good place to start. i am with 90% of the others on here. rb26 is a good motor but its like 20yrs old now. iron block too. not too mention the lack of varible valve. sure modders hate it but it is actully a good thing if u can figure it out...and we all no of the rb26s oil problem. now the vr38 is a brand new motor, all alloy, titianum, alloy and magnesium parts = way superior.

and everyone is up in arms bout the manifold and the turbos being 1 peice, harden up girlscouts. everyone replced mainfolds anyway. the gtr's bay is probly wide enough that turbo replacing can be done from underneath rather then removing the motor 300zx style....not to mention tht intake manifold, pure sex

and the argument of sound? well the rb does sound nice, but the sound a well piped v6 can make is enough to make ur pants tighter.

finally, its a supercar, stop hating and start admiring, can you and will you ever be able to afford one? if so buy it and then tell us how bad it is and then give it to me coz i wont complain

/rant

whoa bkc :D .... thought id start posting and here would be a good place to start. i am with 90% of the others on here. rb26 is a good motor but its like 20yrs old now. iron block too. not too mention the lack of varible valve. sure modders hate it but it is actully a good thing if u can figure it out...and we all no of the rb26s oil problem. now the vr38 is a brand new motor, all alloy, titianum, alloy and magnesium parts = way superior.

and everyone is up in arms bout the manifold and the turbos being 1 peice, harden up girlscouts. everyone replced mainfolds anyway. the gtr's bay is probly wide enough that turbo replacing can be done from underneath rather then removing the motor 300zx style....not to mention tht intake manifold, pure sex

and the argument of sound? well the rb does sound nice, but the sound a well piped v6 can make is enough to make ur pants tighter.

finally, its a supercar, stop hating and start admiring, can you and will you ever be able to afford one? if so buy it and then tell us how bad it is and then give it to me coz i wont complain

/rant

Well said

whoa bkc >_< .... thought id start posting and here would be a good place to start. i am with 90% of the others on here. rb26 is a good motor but its like 20yrs old now. iron block too. not too mention the lack of varible valve. sure modders hate it but it is actully a good thing if u can figure it out...and we all no of the rb26s oil problem. now the vr38 is a brand new motor, all alloy, titianum, alloy and magnesium parts = way superior.

and everyone is up in arms bout the manifold and the turbos being 1 peice, harden up girlscouts. everyone replced mainfolds anyway. the gtr's bay is probly wide enough that turbo replacing can be done from underneath rather then removing the motor 300zx style....not to mention tht intake manifold, pure sex

and the argument of sound? well the rb does sound nice, but the sound a well piped v6 can make is enough to make ur pants tighter.

finally, its a supercar, stop hating and start admiring, can you and will you ever be able to afford one? if so buy it and then tell us how bad it is and then give it to me coz i wont complain

/rant

Thank you for your reply .

General information is correct FOR RB26DETT !

EXAMPLE : GTR34 Z TUNE !! BETTER THAN NEW GTR35 ENGINE !! 2.8DETT !! I

THINK SAME TWIN TURBO iHi !! I am not sure from the twin turbo same it or not !!

!(((the less time best)))! :yes: (( 0-100km)) etc . !!!!

Thanks ALL .

Edited by bkc
Thank you for your reply .

General information is correct FOR RB26DETT !

EXAMPLE : GTR34 Z TUNE !! BETTER THAN NEW GTR35 ENGINE !! 2.8DETT !! I

THINK SAME TWIN TURBO iHi !! I am not sure from the twin turbo same it or not !!

!(((the less time best)))! :P (( 0-100km)) etc . !!!!

Thanks ALL .

Your a fking idiout, someone ban this guy or atleast close the thread.

You should have to have some understanding of the english language before posting

just out of curiousity, would what a z-tune cost? now compare that to the new gtr. also take into consideration that if the z-tune is running a race engine then it isn't going to take that kindly to sitting in traffic and driving down to the shops on a cold morning to get some milk. the vr38 is a high performance engine that can be used in everyday situations. also they r35 probably rides better on rough roads than the z-tune. and finally, as far as life of the engine goes, i'd say that the z-tunes motor would wear out quicker than the vr38. yes it has race internals, but they generally aren't designed to still be putting out full power after 100,000kms.

and i thought the vr38 had been developed with the help of cosworth.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lucky man, who owns it in the family? Any pics? 
    • The engine stuff is Greg Autism to the Max. I contacted Tony Mamo previously from AFR who went off to make his own company to further refine AFR heads. He is a wizard in US LS world. Pretty much the best person on earth who will sell you things he's done weird wizard magic to. The cam spec is not too different. I have a 232/234 .600/603 lift, 114LSA cam currently. The new one is 227/233 .638 .634. The 1.8 ratio roller rockers will effectively push this cam into the ~.670 range. These also get Mamo'ified to be drilled out and tapped to use a 10mm bolt over an 8mm for better stability. This is what lead to the cam being specced. The plan is to run it to 6800. (6600 currently). The Johnson lifters are to maintain proper lift at heavy use which is something the LS7's supposedly fail at and lose a bit of pressure, robbing you of lift at higher RPM. Hollow stem valves for better, well everything, Valve train control. I dunno. Hollow is better. The valves are also not on a standard valve angle. Compression ratio is going from 10.6 to 11.3. The cam is smaller, but also not really... The cam was specced when I generated a chart where I counted the frames of a lap video I had and noted how much of the time in % I spent at what RPM while on track at Sandown. The current cam/heads are a bit mismatched, the standard LS1 heads are the restriction to power, which is why everyone CNC's them to get a pretty solid improvement. Most of the difference between LS1->LS2->LS3 is really just better stock heads. The current cam is falling over about 600rpm earlier than it 'should' given the rest of my current setup. CNC'ing heads closes the gap with regards to heads. Aftermarket heads eliminate the gap and go further. The MMS heads go even further than that, and the heads I have in the box could quite easily be bolted to a 7.0 427ci or 454 and not be any restriction at all. Tony Mamo previously worked with AFR, designed new heads from scratch then eventually founded his own business. There he takes the AFR items and performs further wizardry, CNC'ing them and then manually porting the result. He also ports the FAST102 composite manifold: Before and after There's also an improved racing crank scraper and windage tray. Helps to keep oil in the pan. Supposedly gains 2% power. Tony also ports Melling oil pumps, so you get more oil pressure down low at idle, and the same as what you want up top thanks to a suitable relief spring. There's also the timing chain kit with a Torrington bearing to make sure the cam doesn't have any thrust. Yes I'll post a before and after when it all eventually goes together. It'll probably make 2kw more than a setup that would be $15,000 cheaper :p
    • Because the cars wheels are on blocks, you slide under the car.   Pretty much all the bolts you touched should have been put in, but not fully torque up.   Back them off a turn or two, and then tighten them up from under the car with the wheels sitting on the blocks holding car up in the air.
    • Yes. Imagine you have the car on the ground, and you mine away all the ground under and around it, except for the area directly under each individual wheel. That's exactly how it'd look, except the ground will be what ever you make the bit under each wheel from
    • Yes, if you set the "height" right so that it's basically where it would be when sitting on the wheel. It's actually exactly how I tighten bolts that need to be done that way. However....urethane bushes do NOT need to be done that way. The bush slides on both the inner and outer. It's only rubber bushes that are bonded to the outer that need to be clamped to the crush tube in the "home" position. And my car is so full of sphericals now that I have very few that I need to do properly and I sometimes forget and have to go back and fix it afterwards!
×
×
  • Create New...