Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 266
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

VR38DETT a series VQ + HRVQ with some modification A Result series VR38DETT simply failed engine failure murderer you will see it soon!!

Why are you surprised a lot for the engine failed, in fact??

How has the VQ failed?

The Nismo 380RS has a motorsport version of the engine that makes 400ps with no turbo. That's not bad in anyone's books.

Z1 Auto in the States has just pulled 300rwhp out of a VQ35DE with relatively few modifications, which puts it awfully close to the 100hp/L NA target most "NA sports car OEMs" aim for.

On the FI side, the standard VQ35DE in the V35/Z33 can make a reliable 300rwkW with a pair of turbos at 7psi. There are plenty of guys doing engine rebuilds making 400rwkW at under 1bar, and a high powered drag racer making 1300kW with a VQ.

Nismo has raced, and won, the SuperGT championship with a VQ30DETT in its GT500 Skyline and FairladyZ's in the last few years.

How has the VQ failed?

The Nismo 380RS has a motorsport version of the engine that makes 400ps with no turbo. That's not bad in anyone's books.

Z1 Auto in the States has just pulled 300rwhp out of a VQ35DE with relatively few modifications, which puts it awfully close to the 100hp/L NA target most "NA sports car OEMs" aim for.

On the FI side, the standard VQ35DE in the V35/Z33 can make a reliable 300rwkW with a pair of turbos at 7psi. There are plenty of guys doing engine rebuilds making 400rwkW at under 1bar, and a high powered drag racer making 1300kW with a VQ.

Nismo has raced, and won, the SuperGT championship with a VQ30DETT in its GT500 Skyline and FairladyZ's in the last few years.

All that said I know!! Little did come again!!

Are completion little?? Is VQ 350Z engine successful??!!

Yes engine VQ 350Z good use of the normal daily and only!! But the engine failed absolute failure of a car such as NISSAN Z sports cars, unfortunately!!

The amendment was NEW GTR and the result will be the same shock 350Z with the difference of additional specifications + TWIN TURBO!!! Since it bears the name of legend GTR I regret this and the coming days will prove what I mean!!!

THANKS ALL .....!!!!!!!!!!!!!

bkc...

1.The 350Z is one of the most popular tuned cars in America. The tuning scene in America has taken the Z in open arms.

2. It is not only good for normal daily driving, Nismo have used the engine in their JGTC cars

3. In JGTC the RB26 is getting phased out. As far as I know the grand touring R34 GT-R now uses a twin turbo 350z motor.

4. On a stock motor it is just as reliable if not more than and RB26, but doesn't suffer from oiling problems.

5. THE VR38DETT IS NOT THE SAME AS A VQ MOTOR...THE BLOCK DESIGN IS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT. NOT JUST INTERNALS ARE DIFFERENT. THEY ARE DIFFERENT.

6. The latest GT-R is a big success, 2200 orders have been placed and demand has outstripped supply! It has run a 7minutes 38seconds at nurburgring. The engine has been thoroughly tested. I'm sure if you removed the emissions restrictions the motor would see 400kw easily.

All that said I know!! Little did come again!!

Are completion little?? Is VQ 350Z engine successful??!!

Yes engine VQ 350Z good use of the normal daily and only!! But the engine failed absolute failure of a car such as NISSAN Z sports cars, unfortunately!!

The amendment was NEW GTR and the result will be the same shock 350Z with the difference of additional specifications + TWIN TURBO!!! Since it bears the name of legend GTR I regret this and the coming days will prove what I mean!!!

THANKS ALL .....!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Obviously you couldn't handle my post, too much English for the translator?

I gave several reasons WHY the V6 is superior, so now it's your turn. In Australia we call it PUT UP OR SHUT UP .

Cheers

Gary

Yes, that is the MINES GTR... it's NOT a FACTORY Nissan...

once again, you can't compare the new Nissan GTR to a Modified R34. Wait until MINES get their hands on the R35.. THEN do the comparison.

(is he taking us for a ride?)

Yes, that is the MINES GTR... it's NOT a FACTORY Nissan...

once again, you can't compare the new Nissan GTR to a Modified R34. Wait until MINES get their hands on the R35.. THEN do the comparison.

(is he taking us for a ride?)

Even after the Modified will not be the result of NEW GTR same results, which arrived with the engine RB26DETT!!!

Thanks ALL ....... :)

Can we turn this thread into facts (and reasonable assumption) or ban? :ph34r:

There's only a tiny amount of real discussion in here.

I know you very estimator and in a state of shock and will consider it soon!!!

Thanks aLL ...... :)

Even after the Modified will not be the result of NEW GTR same results, which arrived with the engine RB26DETT!!!

Thanks ALL ....... :)

no it won't be the result of RB26DETT...

do you really think that Jap tuning houses would take the new GTR, throw all their knowledge and experience at it and come out with worse results than the old RB26?

you been smoking to much of that Shisha, haven't you?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Update: I got the magnet out. I bought 3 different flexible magnetic reach tools, but none of them worked. The magnet on the tip was all less than 2lbs of force, so i had to buy a special cylindrical magnet that had a pull force of 9lbs.  The magnet finally came in the mail yesterday, so i got under the car to get to work. The super strong magnet isn't that long, so i only have about 1 finger pinch lengths to hold it. I was so scared when i was going in the hole, that the 9lb magnet would just fly away inside the oil pan never to be seen again, but i had my butt cheeks clenched and finger gripped on that thing so tight, i managed to get it to suck the other magnet out.  It was a victory for me last night.         
    • Yep, pretty much what you said is a good summary. The aftermarket thing just attached to the rim, then has two lines out to valve stems, one to inner wheel, one to outer wheel. Some of the systems even start to air up as you head towards highway speed. IE, you're in the logging tracks, then as speeds increase it knows you're on tarmac and airs up so the driver doesn't even have to remember. I bet the ones that need driver intervention to air up end up seeing a lot more tyre wear from "forest pressures" in use on the highway!
    • Yes, but you need to do these type certifications for tuning parts. That is the absurd part here. Meaning tuning parts are very costly (generally speaking) as well as the technical test documentation for say a turbo swap with more power. It just makes modifying everything crazy expensive and complicated. That bracket has been lost in translation many years ago I assume, it was not there.
    • Hahaha, yeah.... not what you'd call a tamper-proof design.... but yes, with the truck setup, the lines are always connected, but typically they sit just inside the plane of the rear metal mudguards, so if you clear the guards you clear the lines as well. Not rogue 4WD tracks with tree branches and bushes everywhere, ready to hook-up an air hose. You can do it externally like a mod, but dedicated setups air-pressurize the undriven hubs, and on driven axles you can do the same thing, or pressurize the axles (lots of designs out there for this idea)... https://www.trtaustralia.com.au/traction-air-cti-system/  for example.... ..the trouble I've got here... wrt the bimmer ad... is the last bit...they don't want to show it spinning, do they.... give all the illusion that things are moving...but no...and what the hell tyre profile is that?...25??? ...far kernel, rims would be dead inside 10klms on most roads around here.... 😃
    • You're just describing how type certification works. Personally I would be shocked to discover that catalytic converter is not in the stock mounting position. Is there a bracket on the transfer case holding the catalytic converter and front pipe together? If so, it should be in stock position. 
×
×
  • Create New...