Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

On the boot lid of an R34 its got the nissan symbol and it writes skylinne at the bottom yeh.... what will happen if i de badge it??? whats uder there... the reason is coz ive seen 34z wif out it and i rekon it looks better... will there be holes or any thing??? or is it on wif glue? and if so is it a do it urself job??? :rolleyes:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/192516-de-badged/
Share on other sites

Are you sure there will be holes? I don't think those badges would.

If you plan on taking them off, just use a heat gun and some fishing wire. Heat up the glue and use the fishing wire to 'scrape' the badges off from behind. You can use some sort of cut and polish to get rid of some of the outline.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/192516-de-badged/#findComment-3459719
Share on other sites

yeah just leave it aye, cheappest option, i just de-badged my GTT symbol..

if you relly wanna do it, just using a hit gun, or really hot water on it, then give it a jiggle, then is will come off

so will there be any holes or anything?????

coz if there is im gonna leave it

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/192516-de-badged/#findComment-3460551
Share on other sites

No, there are no holes. There was an article in HOT4s where they debadged an R34 GTT the same as you want to do. Just use a hair dryer (heat gun will be better) and floss or fishing line. How faded is your paint? If it has faded, you'll see where the badged were, but otherwise you'd never know they were there

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/192516-de-badged/#findComment-3461476
Share on other sites

No, there are no holes. There was an article in HOT4s where they debadged an R34 GTT the same as you want to do. Just use a hair dryer (heat gun will be better) and floss or fishing line. How faded is your paint? If it has faded, you'll see where the badged were, but otherwise you'd never know they were there

Thats good news mate, im just scared im gonna f*k that paint ,but any wqay im gonna give it it a go

chheeeeers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/192516-de-badged/#findComment-3466284
Share on other sites

no holes...jst take them off...if it does leave a mark you can always stick it back on the original position.

hey

i took it off a few days ago and its just perfect

smoothh very happy wif it and looks much better... i only took off the nissan badge... left the skyline bit

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/192516-de-badged/#findComment-3468992
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • But we haven't even gotten to the point of talking about stateless controllers or any of the good stuff yet!
    • You guys need to take this discussion to another thread if you want to continue it, most of the last 2 pages has nothing to do with OP's questions and situation
    • And this, is just ONE major issue for closed loop control, particularly using PID. One such issue that is created right here, is integrator wind up. But you know GTSBoy, "it's just a simple PID controller"...  
    • Nah. For something like boost control I wouldn't start my design with PID. I'd go with something that originates in the fuzzy logic world and use an emergency function or similar concept. PID can and does work, but at its fundamental level it is not suited to quick action. I'd be reasonably sure that the Profecs et al all transitioned to a fuzzy algorithm back in the 90s. Keep in mind also that where and when I have previously talked about using a Profec, I'm usually talking about only doing an open loop system anyway. All this talk of PID and other algorithms only comes into play when you're talking closed loop boost control, and in the context of what the OP needs and wants, we're probably actually in the realm of open loop anyway. Closed loop boost control has always bothered me, because if you sense the process value (ie the boost measurement that you want to control) in the plenum (after the throttle), then boost control to achieve a target is only desirable at WOT. When you are not WOT, you do not want the the boost to be as high as it can be (ie 100% of target). That's why you do not have the throttle at WO. You're attempting to not go as fast as you can. If the process variable is measured upstream of the throttle (ie in an RB26 plenum, or the cold side pipework in others) then yeah, sure, run the boost controller closed loop to hit a target boost there, and then the throttle does what it is supposed to do. Just for utter clarity.... an old Profec B Spec II (or whatever it is called, and I've got one, and I never look at it, so I can't remember!) and similar might have a MAP sensor, and it might show you the actual boost in the plenum (when the MAP sensor is connected to the plenum) but it does not use that value to decide what it is doing to control the boost, except to control the gating effect (where it stops holding the gate closed on the boost ramp). It's not closed loop at all. Once the gate is released, it's just the solenoid flailing away at whatever duty cycle was configured when it was set up. I'm sure that there are many people who do not understand the above points and wonder wtf is going on.  
    • This has clearly gone off on quite a tangent but the suggestion was "go standalone because you probably aren't going to stop at just exhaust + a mild tune and manual boost controller", not "buy a standalone purely for a boost controller". If the scope does in fact stop creeping at an EBC then sure, buy an EVC7 or Profec or whatever else people like to run and stop there. And I have yet to see any kind of aftermarket boost control that is more complicated than a PID controller with some accounting for edge cases. Control system theory is an incredibly vast field yet somehow we always end up back at some variant of a PID controller, maybe with some work done to linearize things. I have done quite a lot, but I don't care to indulge in those pissing matches, hence posting primary sources. I deal with people quite frequently that scream and shout about how their opinion matters more because they've shipped more x or y, it doesn't change the reality of the data they're trying to disagree with. Arguing that the source material is wrong is an entirely separate point and while my experience obviously doesn't matter here I've rarely seen factory service manuals be incorrect about something. It's not some random poorly documented internal software tool that is constantly being patched to barely work. It's also not that hard to just read the Japanese and double check translations either. Especially in automotive parts most of it is loanwords anyways.
×
×
  • Create New...