Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

After reading alot of threads, posts and infomation from PM's I'm left feeling like my mind is scattered in a thousand directions, kinda like the result of a bull in a china shop.

So I guess I'm after abit of direction.... what better place then here:)

MY GOAL :

RB26 DETT Built to be responsive and very punchy.

Very torque’y through the mid range.

It’s paramount for ENGINE to be reliable AND STRONG.

Its main use will be a street weapon

I currently have :

Tomei Poncams Type B 260 / 260 9.15 lift

Garrett 2860-r turbos

700cc sard inj's

040 bosh fuel pump - intank

Nismo Fuel reg

Apexi Power FC D-jettro

Spitfire coil packs

TRUST FMIC

Sard racing radiator

Full Dual racing N1 spec Kakimoto exhaust. Dual 75mm pipes back to each dump.

Apexi intake pipes and pods

ATM I'm favouring a RB26/30 hybrid for torque and powerband it enables the engine to have. Without having to do insane revs...

Although I have heard a 2.8HKS step 1 stroker kit is very good also...

Any advise from people who actually have such configurations in their GTR's or have some exp in dealing with such engine configerations.

Thanks in advance.

Rob

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/192520-rb26-engine-choices/
Share on other sites

I don't have any personal experience with this since mine is still 2.6L, but if the 3L appeals to you, rather than using an RB30 bottom end (which isn't as strong as the RB26 due to lack of internal bracing), how about an OS Giken 3L kit? It actually uses a big spacer between the head and block, increasing the stroke and retaining the RB26 bottom end.

The HKS 2.8L kit would probably get you what you want if you had smaller turbos (from videos I've seen with 2530 or 2540 turbos) but the OS 3L would get the 28 series or larger turbos spooling much quicker to get your punchy torquey mid-range.

I would personally probably go the OS 3L or HKS 2.8L before a RB26/30 hybrid.

From what I've heard, a HKS V-Cam system (variable valve timing on inlet side) would help in that area also, but I don't know if you can actually get hold of one. On one of my Hot Version DVD's Keichi Tsuchia drives an R34 with it turned off and then turned on, and it made a big difference to the rate of acceleration. It had a TO4Z though.

Good points, but have you actually priced any of these components, i believe an OS 3 lt is in the vicinity of $30k, and the HKS v cam is about $8k, and i dont think its made anymore. If you have the budget, and dont want to stuff around, the stroker cranks are probably the way to go, as they are far simpler than an rb30 conversion

Edited by Adriano

if it was me the hks 2.8l kit would be the way to go, every hybrid rb30 ive seen in a gtr has been a disaster

they usualy foul on everything and have oil issues and alot of them leak oil because of the spacer block for the sump

just my 2 cents

thanx brett

i dont think the os giken 3ltr kit is anywhere near that price, i know otomoto in syd sells os giken stuff, ok i was wrong these things are farkin expensive not 30k but close enough to it here's the link http://www.otomoto.com.au/osgiken/RB30_race_engine.htm

3ltr is 23.500k and the 3.1 ltr kit is 25.500k

and as r32-25t said 3ltr in a gtr has its issues, add an extra 30mm to the top of the engine for the extra capacity and add another 10mm to the bottom of the engine for the spacer plate (only need the spacer plate if you run an rb30 block) you cant really go to far moving the engine up or down in a gtr cause of the front drive shafts, move them to much and you chew the front wheel bearings :)

if you went the os giken way you just have to worry bout the 30mm on the top of the engine, mayby just raise the bonnet a bit if you had clearance issue's so you didnt have to mess with the orientation of the drive shafts.

anyway if i had a gtr and was making this decision id go the hks 2.8 kit, good internals, cheaper than the os kit, not as much stuffing around with the hight etc

hope this helps :glare:

I don't have any personal experience with this since mine is still 2.6L, but if the 3L appeals to you, rather than using an RB30 bottom end (which isn't as strong as the RB26 due to lack of internal bracing), how about an OS Giken 3L kit? It actually uses a big spacer between the head and block, increasing the stroke and retaining the RB26 bottom end.

The HKS 2.8L kit would probably get you what you want if you had smaller turbos (from videos I've seen with 2530 or 2540 turbos) but the OS 3L would get the 28 series or larger turbos spooling much quicker to get your punchy torquey mid-range.

I would personally probably go the OS 3L or HKS 2.8L before a RB26/30 hybrid.

From what I've heard, a HKS V-Cam system (variable valve timing on inlet side) would help in that area also, but I don't know if you can actually get hold of one. On one of my Hot Version DVD's Keichi Tsuchia drives an R34 with it turned off and then turned on, and it made a big difference to the rate of acceleration. It had a TO4Z though.

For the record the Rb30 block is every bit as strong as the RB26, it doesn't lack internal bracing.

Take some time to read up on this forum about this combination and how good it is, you will be plesantly suprised.

there is one crucial part missing here. budget? how much do you want to spend (this will become the min) and how much can you spend (this is your max!).

I mean if money is no object then for me the choice would be:

new N1 or GT block

HKS S3 2.8

enlarged sump

tomei oil pump

HKS 2530s or T04Z

manifolds

dumps

fully ported head, with new springs etc

V-cam

bobs you're uncle but you are now $50K or so poorer.

After reading alot of threads, posts and infomation from PM's I'm left feeling like my mind is scattered in a thousand directions, kinda like the result of a bull in a china shop.

So I guess I'm after abit of direction.... what better place then here:)

MY GOAL :

RB26 DETT Built to be responsive and very punchy.

Very torque’y through the mid range.

It’s paramount for ENGINE to be reliable AND STRONG.

Its main use will be a street weapon

ATM I'm favouring a RB26/30 hybrid for torque and powerband it enables the engine to have. Without having to do insane revs...

Although I have heard a 2.8HKS step 1 stroker kit is very good also...

Any advise from people who actually have such configurations in their GTR's or have some exp in dealing with such engine configerations.

Thanks in advance.

Rob

Hi Rob,

I'm in the process of building an Rb30 bottom end for my bunky gtr. I started going down this path some years ago for pretty much the same reasons you are now looking at it.

Really the Rb30 setup gives you a fantastic rod ratio as well as more capacity, so if you build it right you can have a fair whack of an rpm range as well as capacity.

I'm dobbing Sydneykid in for some very good guidance on doing a decent 26/30 build ( PM box will fill shortly --- sorry mate).

Cheers

Dave

HKS no longer sell a Step 1 2.8l kit. Step 3 or nothing anyway. :worship: You might find a Step 1 second hand or old stock but people snap them up from what i've seen. Also you can have a brand new HKS V-Cam system landed for well under $4k forget that $8k price tag. Still mega dollars though.

I personally wouldn't touch a 26/30 hybrid with ten 10 foot poles joined together. A lot of other guys will say the exact opposite though and love them to bits. Each to their own.

For the record the Rb30 block is every bit as strong as the RB26, it doesn't lack internal bracing.

Take some time to read up on this forum about this combination and how good it is, you will be plesantly suprised.

I wasn't saying it wasn't any good, just not AS good.

Just going off info I have read on these forums and magazines, I was lead to believe that the RB26 block had extra internal bracing to handle second (or third? can't remember) order harmonics present in the high end of the rev range (not entirely sure what revs, but somewhere around 8000). The RB30 was never meant to rev past about 7000, so as long as you don't go that far, the extra bracing probably isn't be needed. The RB26 however is designed to rev to over 8000 where second order harmonics are present, so the extra bracing was added to handle it, even as far as 10,000. The same can not be expected with an RB30 block.

Now I don't pretend to know much about engine harmonics, I'm just regurgitating what I've read, so if any of that is off, I'm qhite happy to have it staightened for me :huh:

Edited by EVIL TWIN
there is one crucial part missing here. budget? how much do you want to spend (this will become the min) and how much can you spend (this is your max!).

I mean if money is no object then for me the choice would be:

new N1 or GT block

HKS S3 2.8

enlarged sump

tomei oil pump

HKS 2530s or T04Z

manifolds

dumps

fully ported head, with new springs etc

V-cam

bobs you're uncle but you are now $50K or so poorer.

If funds were unlimited this is waht I would do. The HKS ultimate street car ran this setup with a T04Z and looked amazingly powerful and very driveable.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...