Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys,

I have a r33 gts-t and have a FMIC kit from justjap :worship:

I have a mate that works in the fabrication area and he said he'll help me out with making a custom intercooler pipe that runs under the cooler and back to the stock pipes like the blitz LM cooler.

My question is (refer to image)

where the arrow is, along the straight part of the pipe that runs from each bend (left to right) could i make that section of pipe 2 or 2.5 inches and then leave rest of the piping 3 inches?

This will allow more clearance under the pipe from the ground. Or would this restrict flow and cause issues?

thanks in advance

post-23613-1194475694_thumb.jpg

Edited by Ricos
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/192726-fmic-intercooler-pipe/
Share on other sites

It will make very little difference in ground clearance reducing the pipe diameter where you've mentioned. Providing you mount the kit right you shouldn't have any issues. If your that worried, run the piping behind the cooler rather than under it. Also a 180 bend that tight will cause restriction, I'd be thinking about extending it a bit.

Thanks

the sketch isn't to scale :worship:

the 180 bend wont be so harsh as there needs to be room for the pipe to drop when it runs under the cooler. I can't run the pipe behind the cooler as there wont be room....other than that i dont no how to loosen up or extend the 180 bend....im really just copying the blitz LM piping, except my 180 bend will be situated on the pipe were as the blitz setup is on the core itself (see image)

post-23613-1194477123_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It's kind of interesting - They definitely do builds that split the difference between what they like and what will generate views and engagement. The NC Platform always surprises everyone in a good way, in an uncomfortably good way some may say. They could throw a LS in there and arguably have the best (and best performing) car of the entire stable. But that isn't necessarily what draws views, because people viewing don't want to accept the vegetables of a LS NC MX5 being a superior vehicle in every way (including fun) than a RB26 240Z. This is also why there's not a lot of content about the GR Yaris (on the web in general). They're too good, yet 'only a Yaris' The community doesn't want certain cars to be as good as they are - to beat their hero cars, and I believe the NC MX5 is absolutely one of those cars.
    • Yeah - My key still does the chime thing. I followed the procedure but it didn't activate on the (identical) third set of keyfob that I had. I vaguely remember the alarm saying you can only pair two keys with it. Now that I've dug it up, it appears that you very much can pair keyfobs to the alarm system. (which are the fobs I use to unlock the car). I have successfully diverted the thread and can probably not use the OEM keyfob ever again unless I use the aftermarket alarm and attempt to pair the OEM keyfob to it. Which might just work, or not :D. I definitely used the nissan method and not the aftermarket alarm method.
    • What makes it worse is that Nissan made keys in the same style, for example R34 and Stagea, but they work at different frequencies or something like that. So they look the same but the remotes are not interchangeable. I learned that from some guy selling aftermarket blank keys.
    • Does your door chime work when you have the key in the lock and open the door? I've had that disabled because it's f**king annoying and it is one thing that messes with the pairing. Because now the car doesn't detect key in ignition anymore and the slide-key-in-and-out sequence does not trigger the pairing mode anymore. The service manual has a section on the various bits involved in doing the syncing. I presume it'll be similar between Stagea and R34.
    • Agree, but meh, I think is is based more on LOLS than actually apples to apples, like, who would have thunk a turbo 4 cylinder would not beat a NA 4 cylinder  I think with just basic N/A mods, like a exhaust and tune, it would be equal to the Mini in its current form, maybe I know my current 2.5 would "chop the mini" as the midrange now has a night and day difference in power delivery compared to the tuned 2.0, by around 20kwatw and 30nm from around 2k rpm "ish"....... I'm kinda hoping that they do a N/A build, either with the MZR 2.0 or with whatever they decide to use If I recall correctly they did talk about K swapping one a while ago
×
×
  • Create New...