Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

FRP?

As for motor limit, same as everyone else mate. 300-330rwkw depending on condition.

opps soz i meant fuel pressure regulator.

Motor condition is good. When i got the car its done 60k and its dead stock. Not even an exhaust system.

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

im thinking lon term too. If holden decides to put out a smoking HSV with 400kw we can let the HSV smoke me right? So get the biggest injectors and when i want to use its there dont need to waste 2x the $$

its called power to weight ratio mate... sure the HSV has 400kw(thats at the fly)... and your car makes 320 (At the wheels!!) your car still weighs alot less!! and you got AWD.

if any HSV beats you, you should be ashamed haha.

Edited by -_-StRyDeR-_-
im thinking lon term too. If holden decides to put out a smoking HSV with 400kw we can let the HSV smoke me right? So get the biggest injectors and when i want to use its there dont need to waste 2x the $$

bigger isn't better. buy something appropriately sized. ie. listen to what you are being told by those that KNOW what they are talking about.

800cc is good for 800hp @ the flywheel. when you rebuild your engine to cope, a new set of injectors will be the least of your worries.

OK i will settel for a smaller injectors. A 555cc is enough? What capacity are the 555cc injectors working at if im pumping out say 320kw@wheels which is roughly 390kw@craml? I never like to max out a capacity of an equipment. I like to leave it at 80% capacity instead of having to work out max.

But i think now i will go for the 2860R -5. Should this be sufficient to make 320kw@wheels? And will the 555cc injectors match the turbos?

Im also confused between the terms GTSS and 2860R-5. Im presuming that the power output is fairly similar? And "GTSS" is just a garret turbo market. The euilvalent to the "GTSS" is the 2860R -5? Theres about A$800 difference between the 2turbos. Is it worth it to buy the Hks "GTSS"? Or just get the 2860R -5? Thanks guys for the input. What would i do without you guys.

800cc = 800hp?? damn how incorrect is that...

standard GTR injectors r what... 444cc?? so it has a max output of 444hp @ fly? lol ok champ no worries

sit down b4 u hurt urself :glare:

yeah chuckles that's right allowing about 85% duty cycle at standard rail pressure.

are you saying higher or lower?

Edited by wolverine

im sayin higher.. but its also dependant on the engine type and tuning.

My car atm is makin around 390hp @ 4 wheels... which is higher than 444hp @ fly.. MUCH higher.. drive train loss will be atleast 100hp on a conservative 25% loss.. it will be higher, but say its not. that puts the injectors @ 490hp flow and theyre not @ 85% yet. i think they were sittin @ 80? cant remember too well but it wasnt that high. I thikn i can get another 40hpish outta the injectors b4 i start runnin into duty cycle problems.

But depends on engine.. my last car was an rx7. i ran 4x 1600cc injectors.. ill be damnd if they could supply enough fuel for 1600hp lol... i think that one was makin around 700hp @ fly with injectors @ around 90% :glare:

as for losing 70kw over a 4wd system which using hydraulics to transfer torque to the front.. ur dreamin buddy.. 320 @ wheels is well over 450kw @ crank

Edited by Bumblebee
im thinking lon term too. If holden decides to put out a smoking HSV with 400kw we can let the HSV smoke me right? So get the biggest injectors and when i want to use its there dont need to waste 2x the $$

Yeah, but then you'd need to change turbo's, build a motor, etc etc. So basically another 15k :yes:

So if you dont really plan on that then 550's will be ample for the task at hand.

800cc = 800hp?? damn how incorrect is that...

Not incorrect at all, read the next section of this post.

im sayin higher.. but its also dependant on the engine type and tuning.

My car atm is makin around 390hp @ 4 wheels... which is higher than 444hp @ fly.. MUCH higher.. drive train loss will be atleast 100hp on a conservative 25% loss.. it will be higher, but say its not. that puts the injectors @ 490hp flow and theyre not @ 85% yet. i think they were sittin @ 80? cant remember too well but it wasnt that high. I thikn i can get another 40hpish outta the injectors b4 i start runnin into duty cycle problems.

But depends on engine.. my last car was an rx7. i ran 4x 1600cc injectors.. ill be damnd if they could supply enough fuel for 1600hp lol... i think that one was makin around 700hp @ fly with injectors @ around 90% :glare:

as for losing 70kw over a 4wd system which using hydraulics to transfer torque to the front.. ur dreamin buddy.. 320 @ wheels is well over 450kw @ crank

You dont get 25% drivetrain loss, what are you on about mate?

I think someone has been feeding you some wrong information.

320rwkw is NOT 'well over' 450kw @ the crank. Not even close, your honestly beyond wrong on that.

Its probably closer to 380-390kw @ the crank or there abouts.

In a 6 cylinder motor, its pretty basic for injectors. 550cc = 550hp for the sake of the point.

Yes its not an "exact" calculation, but its near enough for what we need to discuss.

Obviously you can 'squeeze' more out of the injectors if you bump the rail pressure, but im keeping it simple as there isn't a need for that detail here.

Im also confused between the terms GTSS and 2860R-5. Im presuming that the power output is fairly similar? And "GTSS" is just a garret turbo market. The euilvalent to the "GTSS" is the 2860R -5? Theres about A$800 difference between the 2turbos. Is it worth it to buy the Hks "GTSS"? Or just get the 2860R -5? Thanks guys for the input. What would i do without you guys.

Garretts come with just the turbos.

HKS come in a kit with all the parts.

By the time you purchase all the things like gaskets, washers and so on.

The actual difference in price is only as few hundred as GT-SS for the RB26 are cheap due to the good Yen price at the moment.

So its upto you for that as the price really isnt that much different. Maybe $400 at the end of the day (rough stab)

25% incorrect? ROFL ok champ :glare:

a RWD car loses between 20-30% power through the drivetrain and axles from the crank.. from crank it goes into flywheel, clutch, gears, tail shaft, diff then axles

the industry NORM is 20-30%

Thats RWD

a AWD loses a shitload more then that. Its not wrong info. its facts. a 300kw rwd car makes about 210-220rwkw. Thats a lose of roughly 80kw. And thats from going from engine dyno.. to a chassis dyno. thats higher than 20%

a FWD car which makes roughyl 140kw @ crank, makes roughly 100-105kw @ wheels.. thats more than 20%

If u think the losses on an AWD car which uses a pump thats virtually the same as an automatic torque converter loses LESS.. ur a dreamer in ur own right.

How about then you go do some testing please?

GTR RWD to AWD - minimal difference in power loss, and its been seen time and time again by people who drop the front shaft. Do a few runs, then put the shaft back in and do a few runs.

I realise you semi-new here so you've probably missed the dozen threads on it.

ATTESSA doesn't transfer power if it has traction at the rear. Do you not even understand how the car works or what?

To say 320rwkw is MUCH MORE than 450kw @ the fly is wrong. That makes it at over 600hp, and that's rubbish.

it wasnt supposed to be 320rwkw... it was meant to be 320awkw.. and u dont lose much power goin from rwd to awd?

so why is it.. i cant crack 300kw in awd.. but in rwd i can easily crack 300kw? not much difference?? no worries CHAMP

im a mechanic and i know exactly how the transfer case works on the GTR and any other car on this planet, given that i have seen it. :glare:

on a DYNO the GTR will put power to the front hweels because.. it "slips" the rears.. on a dyno.. the rears move and the fronts dont.. the comp see's loss of traction and engages the front.

sorry dude.. but i seen the dyno figures over and over and over again and i cbf arguing with u or u internet buddies.

u will always lose power going from rwd/fwd to awd

So where did the 600hp+ argument go all of a sudden, no mention of it in your post? (conveniently)

After all, that is the main issue here that you think 320kw @ the wheels is well over 600hp @ the fly.

Anyway, back on topic......

With advances in turbo technology the makers have also moved toward a longer life bearing, that of the ball bearing. While there may be some evidence that a BB will spool faster, I consider that is due to the improved geometry in the modern turbos running BB. I'm yet to see any real testing that proves that exactly the same turbos except with journal or BB would be very different. In fact, the journal, running perfectly is only riding on a film of oil, while a BB has to also accelerate the bearings at a greater radius, and so would by every engineering principle be slower to spool if everything else was equal.

Given that cheaper highflows aren't as economical as they used to be when Slide did them I would Highly recommend the GTSS or 2860 setup.

Also common practice is to assume between 25-30% losses through drivetrain and tyres on a dyno unless it is a direct connection to the hubs, such as Dynapack.

No sense arguing with Ash, he only repeats what others say, although he is an authority on prices, especially for others doing the work, so worth listening there.

But depends on engine.. my last car was an rx7. i ran 4x 1600cc injectors.. ill be damnd if they could supply enough fuel for 1600hp lol.
and
im a mechanic

as a mechanic you should know better that the number of cylinders is an important difference when talking about injectors (and rail pressure).

back on topic, 800cc injectors are overkill for this application and smaller injectors should be a better choice. i'm sure bumblebee can help get the correct size for you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi everyone, Apologies in advance if this feels like a topic covered multiple times. I'm only asking because some of the old topics I found are missing images now. I'm in the process of getting a manual boost controller (BC). Nothing fancy, just getting a manual one for now as I don't plan to go crazy with it and would not go over 10 PSI. My car is not jacked up on boost steroids to do crazy numbers. I want to understand the OEM setup of the boost solenoid and vacuum lines on the R34 GTT so I know what needs to be changed when I do install the BC. I sketched the current setup to the best I could see and it's on the diagram attached. If the boost controller 'Wastegate Arrow' goes from nipple 1 to 2. My understanding is that the red vacuum line's "F" connector-end should be connected to BC nipple #2? Nipple #1 is meant to have the "pressure source" so what vacuum line would that be? Is it the green vacuum line?  From what I have read here, the OEM boost solenoid is not used at this point. So that can come out and then I can just plug the nipple that usually connects to the blue vacuum line?  So would the final setup look something like this?   Thanks in advance. I don't want to already be knee-deep into pulling out vacuum lines before understanding this. I'm a noob when it comes to boost setups so trying to learn as I go.
    • Initial/early bite is a feature of.....generic pads. Things that work cold. Just put Bendix Ultimate in it. If you don't like them, it's only $3.50 wasted and an hour to change them. I've been using Intima SR, and they seem to be a good performance pad. Street friendly and able to take at least a little beating.
    • This is my first post after registering.. I hope i can find useful resources on this forum. Great forum. 
    • As I implied in my post, I have NO idea what the were. But in case I didn't make it clear, the way they performed was brilliant; whatever the brand was. I think it was the compound that made the difference. And if they were Bendix, then sign me up, I want another set. I did drive down mount Ousley (just outside of the Gong) a few times, and they showed no untowards performance.   Its not the low dust that I am looking for NOW. At the time I needed low dust, but now I have no issues with dust but want the initial/early bite of the pads that were used. Yeah, the early cold squeal may of been due to a missing shim or such.  And to repeat, its not the low dust I am seeking, its the initial bite of the pads and increase in bite as  the warmed up during each breaking. As soon as I let off, I don't remember the breaks being extra sticky if I used them again soon after. But I also did not test that theory.   Thanks for the recommendation, But I would prefer to choose something specifically with the behaviour I described.   I assume that they didn't use the default compound off the shelf, as we discussed the dust issue at length. And the early squeal when cold, I have seen the sound is more of an issue with some pad compounds. Mostly ceramic, which also are said to produce less dust.
    • Well, in 2007 he must have been charging about $1800 an hour. He only looked at the car for 5 minutes. And another 4 to write the report wrong, and another minute to correct it. Mind you, this was for a car that was: Stock engine, fmic (hole in drivers guard), all alloy intake and custom air box, 3 inch turbo back exhaust, lowered, and a set of 17" Advans (255/40/17 rear and 235/45/17 front). It was nothing crazy. The blue slipper wanted the "hole in the guard" engineered. But that was because he got the shits that I wouldn't "relocate the battery from the boot, back to the factory position in the engine bay"... In an R33 GTST...     Also for emissions, E85, and don't go wild on timing. It's amazing how the closer you get ignition timing towards max torque, the last couple of degrees really throw NOx counts right up. And for the huge increase in emissions, it's only a small increase in torque.
×
×
  • Create New...