Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I like the system in NSW but, i kinda have respect for it, advertising the camera ensures they get the end result they want ie people slow down at a hot spot and isnt a simple money grab

Agree andy..

when i was driving around in NSW on the way too woollongong its soo tempting to speed up and down the mountains.. and the big mofo signs catch ur attention and send u back to reality.

might i ask wher are theses speed reading signs.. i havent seen any around .. but then again i dont venture more than 15kms from the M1.

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

For those who are concerned with fixed cameras, get a TomTom and add them as POI's(Points of interest) and you can set your TomTom to give you an audible alert everytime you are within x distance from them. I currently have this setup for Police stations so I know to have the car in a higher gear then needed to keep the sound down.

I think if they are signed like in NSW it is a good thing, as you see the signs and slow down so the desired outcome in high accident zones is achieved. Better than the mobile cameras that they hide in the shrubs!

Why doesn't any australian state make a defensive driving course a compulsory part of getting your Ps or full license? Germany does and look how few accidents they have for the population! They also have cops who go around recording on a video camera peoples bad driving. They then pull them over to explain why what they did was dangerous, not hand out fines. That would be so much more useful!

Tarragindi off-ramp (M1) on Brisbane's Southside

Bruce Highway at Burpengary

east-side of the Story Bridge targeting vehicles traveling from both directions.

Can anyone with a GPS give me the lat and long so I can store these in my Tom Tom?

Thanks :teehee:

Edited by CanberraR33

Biggest problem I see here in QLD James is the Police and government only seem to consirntrate on speeding and how to reduce speeding cars on the road.

I dont know the specific percentages, but I reckon at a good guess that speeding is probablly the cause in maby less than 20% of all accidents.

The fatal 4 as they say makes up for over 95% of all fatilities. So what are they doing to reduce people from driving tired? What about making car makers to install a system where the car wont start until the seat belts is clicked in? Also what about more random breath testing, I know I have not been pulled over for that in years.

I reckon the reason they concerntrate on speeding is because its raising money from tickets, and its easy to monitor and issue fines with the current technoligy around today.

I personally believe the state government and federal government need to spend some time and look into possible solutions to lowering fatilities in car accidents by looking at the other 3 major causes of accidents (Driving tired, seat belts and drink driving). The look at he federal black spots where there are always accidents and find a way to redesign the road to be more suitable to the conditions rain, hail or shine. If this means lowering the speed limit then do it. If it means putting in a cement barrier in the middle than do it, maby some extra signage and line marking might make a world of difference.

Anyway enough from me for now, I just believe they are not doing enough and spending the tax payers dollars in the wrong areas. Im not saying dont have speed cameras cause they are a deterant and very usefull to slow speeders down. But please look at other ways to reduce road tolls, look at a better way to spend the money raised from speeding fines and use it to improve black spots and most importantlly driver education.

Not to mention that any accident that usually ends up being driver inattentiveness tends to get marked as excessive speed because assholes don't own up to the fact that they weren't paying attention.

This also includes not driving to the road and traffic conditions.

what really annoys the shit outa me is people who do 70 in an 80 zone, then continue to do 70 after it has changed to a 60 zone. they just couldn't give a f**k about the rules just need to do their own thing grrrrrrrrr that rages me.

it sucks the enough is enough campaign has failed, i think the target was 320 deaths, which has been exceeded twice in the past two years. such a waste

I dont know the specific percentages, but I reckon at a good guess that speeding is probablly the cause in maby less than 20% of all accidents.

Speed doesn't cause accidents, failing to give way causes accidents. You can't run into other cars/pedestrians if you follow the road rules and give way where required. Speed can contribute to an accident (there is a big difference between causing and contributing) which is what the media will always focus on.

The fatal 4 as they say makes up for over 95% of all fatilities. So what are they doing to reduce people from driving tired? What about making car makers to install a system where the car wont start until the seat belts is clicked in? Also what about more random breath testing, I know I have not been pulled over for that in years.

I reckon the reason they concerntrate on speeding is because its raising money from tickets, and its easy to monitor and issue fines with the current technoligy around today.

Three pretty simple reasons for speed cameras:

1. Speed cameras are cheap, people are not. How many cameras can you buy for $50k? And that's a once off payment.

2. Speed cameras can fine multiple people per second in the right location. You can't raise those kinds of dollars with real police doing real police work.

3. People are so used to being bent over now we have grown to just accept it.

Anyway enough from me for now, I just believe they are not doing enough and spending the tax payers dollars in the wrong areas. Im not saying dont have speed cameras cause they are a deterant and very usefull to slow speeders down. But please look at other ways to reduce road tolls, look at a better way to spend the money raised from speeding fines and use it to improve black spots and most importantlly driver education.

I don't have a problem with speed cameras either as they serve a purpose. I have a problem with the government touting these cameras as "saving lives" which the ignorant public swallows hook, line and sinker. We have no one to blame but ourselves because we vote these people in and we accept the crap they dish out without question.

Join politics then Marki...

Have a no speed camera policy... :yes:

I can see it now;

VOTE 1 Marki Hanson

"I believe in doing 100 in a 60 zone and getting away with it, I believe in O plates for old people, I believe in 180sx's beating Skylines in hill climbs, I believe in having a relationship with your first cousin should be legal, I believe in Ben Cousins promise to kick the habbit"

Would be funny, like the "National Womens Party" or "The fishing party" whats with those right wing nutter on the ballet paper???

you heard the nazi mod. VOTE 1 Me..

hanson..?? i did not have sexual relations with that woman!!!... maybe

ive never been done for speeding its always RBTs and smacks for having mods on my car.. in the GTR.. i got pulled over for speeding up the back of a cop and backing off. he couldnt prove my speed so he smacked my wrist.. i enjoyed it

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They need to get a grip. R32 GTRs got as low as AU$8-10K at one point here.
    • You have just offended every teenage boy in America
    • Structured text and other high level PLC programing languages are not allowable in Functional Safety. They are very difficult to audit. My PLC stuff is almost exclusively oriented towards Burner Management Systems which are a particularly pernicious form of Safety Instrumented System, when implemented in an SPLC. Even the part of the code written to work in the non-safety logic part of the PLC, like with a Siemens S7-1500 series, still needs to be treated as if it was safety code, with access restrictions, code fingreprints and the like. And Allen Bradley can go EABODs. They ae full of shit. They have this whole lie going on where they say if you use a ControlLogix controller and its IO, and then just duplicate the IOs (ie, run in series or parallel depending on type, to try to make it "fail safe") and "use these programming styles and place these restrictions on what you do" that you can achieve SIL2. What a load of crap. They just get away with it because no-one in the US seems to understand the first thing about Functional Safety and carries on as if all they have to do is buy only SIL2 rated equipment and hey presto, it's a SIL2 system. Idiots. /rant
    • If you're really considering leaving it, a great question to ask is, is the magnet going to stick to the sump? The answer to the above is the same answer towards if I'd have any level of comfort leaving it... Personally, based on the cost of a motor if the magnet were to cause damage, I'd be fishing it out either way. Use the methods in here. It fit in through the plug hole, it'll come out.   PS, get a small actuatable claw for a bore scope. OR if you know a vet, they have really cool controllable scopes with hooks on the end. Supposedly they're like playing a video game. Ask if they can acquire you one of their scopes... Engine oil after all is just a different type of lube right? Will only make it easier on the next dog or cat...
    • All other (Boolean) logic functions though, are just built on those blocks above. Which does give you a lot of functionality in logic. It is basing that on using thresholds with analogue signals like GTS alluded to.   Not having things like timers will make it less useful for some of the ramp up logic you'd want, and again, on Haltecs capacity specifically, I'm not across anymore what you can / can't do with different tables.   I'm assuming, with your logic you want to implement, not only do you want your timing safeties, you're wanting to be able to derive the duty cycle for your solenoid, to maintain I'm assuming 175PSi? Or are you using a standalone WMI controller to maintain the DC correct, and you just want the Haltech working out which fuelling maps you should be on?
×
×
  • Create New...