Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If you don't have a hand controller it's also possible to setup the PFC so that it flashes the warning lights if knock exceeds a certain threshold.

I think it does anyways when it goes over 60. (default i think) I know my engine light flashes if it goes over 60.

our dog box used to set off the knock sensors something fierce before we changed to sm4. Like said earlier on, its not always the engine sometimes outside noises can set them off even when there is no detonation.

a power fc reading of 125 is false, if it was correct you would definately hear it even if you didnt know what knock is. The knock sensor has picked something else up and like explained above there are many things that create the "frequency" that the knock sensor is tuned to detect, even rocks/pebbles being flung up into the engine bay can set this off.

If you are driving around with the normal max knock sensor of 40 thats ok. Anything around a true knock reading of 80 or so and knocking or pinging whatever you like to call is audible. You'll know when it pings, its a very distint noise.

To make yourself sleep a bit easier, stick it on the dyno and get a pull done just to double check afr's and knock levels

cheers

So then, a reading of > 120 should be ignored...

A question, if it is something else causing it, why when I add more fuel in, drop the ignition timing, the knock value lowers it self to a respectable level?

knock sensors, readings, what they mean etc have been done to death

check out the powerfc faq in my signature for some extensive work on knocking and debugging it

dont ignore it - you may as well just buy new forged pistons now if you just keep ignoring it

So then, a reading of > 120 should be ignored...

A question, if it is something else causing it, why when I add more fuel in, drop the ignition timing, the knock value lowers it self to a respectable level?

i wouldnt believe a reading of 120 if i couldnt hear it, like i said knocking becomes quite clear around the 80 reading on the handcontroller. At 120 its pinging its nuts off and people in a car next you would also clearly hear it, thats how severe it is.

This isnt to say the car isnt suffering from detention even if the reading is incorrect, but to be safe take it to a dyno and then you can rest assure everything is ok

So then, a reading of > 120 should be ignored...

A question, if it is something else causing it, why when I add more fuel in, drop the ignition timing, the knock value lowers it self to a respectable level?

Haha, new Tetris High Score today, got 154. Fark. I really gotta get this shit sorted out. I hate having no money.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Structured text and other high level PLC programing languages are not allowable in Functional Safety. They are very difficult to audit. My PLC stuff is almost exclusively oriented towards Burner Management Systems which are a particularly pernicious form of Safety Instrumented System, when implemented in an SPLC. Even the part of the code written to work in the non-safety logic part of the PLC, like with a Siemens S7-1500 series, still needs to be treated as if it was safety code, with access restrictions, code fingreprints and the like. And Allen Bradley can go EABODs. They ae full of shit. They have this whole lie going on where they say if you use a ControlLogix controller and its IO, and then just duplicate the IOs (ie, run in series or parallel depending on type, to try to make it "fail safe") and "use these programming styles and place these restrictions on what you do" that you can achieve SIL2. What a load of crap. They just get away with it because no-one in the US seems to understand the first thing about Functional Safety and carries on as if all they have to do is buy only SIL2 rated equipment and hey presto, it's a SIL2 system. Idiots. /rant
    • If you're really considering leaving it, a great question to ask is, is the magnet going to stick to the sump? The answer to the above is the same answer towards if I'd have any level of comfort leaving it... Personally, based on the cost of a motor if the magnet were to cause damage, I'd be fishing it out either way. Use the methods in here. It fit in through the plug hole, it'll come out.   PS, get a small actuatable claw for a bore scope. OR if you know a vet, they have really cool controllable scopes with hooks on the end. Supposedly they're like playing a video game. Ask if they can acquire you one of their scopes... Engine oil after all is just a different type of lube right? Will only make it easier on the next dog or cat...
    • All other (Boolean) logic functions though, are just built on those blocks above. Which does give you a lot of functionality in logic. It is basing that on using thresholds with analogue signals like GTS alluded to.   Not having things like timers will make it less useful for some of the ramp up logic you'd want, and again, on Haltecs capacity specifically, I'm not across anymore what you can / can't do with different tables.   I'm assuming, with your logic you want to implement, not only do you want your timing safeties, you're wanting to be able to derive the duty cycle for your solenoid, to maintain I'm assuming 175PSi? Or are you using a standalone WMI controller to maintain the DC correct, and you just want the Haltech working out which fuelling maps you should be on?
    • It doesn't seem to follow revs. Oddly it seems to follow TPS a little bit from what I can see, but with some delay a bit. IE end of the graph, when he lets off throttle fully, pressure drops a lot, then slowly builds back up, but rpm is on a nice cruisey drop off. I do agree though, it seems very electrically.
    • I just try to entirely stay away from ladder now unless it's something basic maintained by electricians. Even then and to your point, it mostly ends up being blocks I wrote in structured text.  PLC's are slowly going towards C, C++ and C#. I just wish Allen-Bradley would jump on the bandwagon. 
×
×
  • Create New...