Jump to content
SAU Community

Rb25det Max Rwkw With Stock Bottom End?


GTRsean
 Share

Recommended Posts

On behalf of a mate who has an R34GTT.

What is the most RWKW you have managed to get from an internally stock(pistons and rods) RB25DET, R33 or R34.

Stock RB25DET NEO,

tomei 260 poncams,

plazmaman intake manifold

High mount mainfold with TO4Z

800cc injectors

044 pump

pressure reg

363RWKW @22PSI Dyno dynamics shootout without nos.

Cheers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's make a bet. I'm putting $20 it won't even do a WSID warm-up run

:thumbsup:

So long as it has a thicker headgasket and a good tune it should hold on for a while. I know a few around here who have done them - not sure how it'd relate to the dyno referred to here but the cars in question were running high 120/low 130mph trap speeds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im pretty sure whoever built this setup knows how long that sort of boost,turbo,power would last on a stock RB25 otherwise it would have run less boost etc if they were worrying about blowing the engine. He is obviously wondering how much MAX power other RB25 users have made before detonation. Obviously he knows what happens when you run that power through a stock motor. Happy dyno or not that is an Awesome figure & probably a good tuner! Sean let us know how long the setup lasts even if your mate runs low boost settings most of the time..

RB25 FTW!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are ppl having a go at him ? I think its awesome its making 486rwhp on a stock engine. Who cares it if might break in the future. Then he can build it. I know multiple rb25's with stock internals making mid 400's hp and been going for a long time as long as the tune is safe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why would it break?

it will only break if it detonates, if its tuned correctly it will last for a very long time.

maybe it runs race fuel or toluene all the time as a safety measure.

rbs are a well built and engineered engine from factory, unsure why everyone is so paranoid, crap tuning kills them, not power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it does break, for god's sake do not rebuild it. Just get another stocker and have another 6 months more fun. Will be cheaper and less headaches.

Oh and like I mentioned before, the rods will be the weak link in the equation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, this thread got off topic quick. Time to start a new thread with no chit chat or debate, and just #'s (like the dyno stickies). I personaly think it's all in the tune untill around 600bhp when you start getting close to lifting the head or snapping a con-rod. Also, do you guys have a good hp to KW calculator us Yankees can use?

Anywho, with my old setup, I made 400rwhp with a completly stock motor. Stock headgasket, cams, pistons, rods, intake manifold, throttle body, etc with a TO4e @ 1.2 bar (dropping off to around .9 at the end). I ran it like this for around 8 months.

I'm now running a Holset HX35/40 hybrid @ 1.5bar. I haven't had it to the dyno yet (maybe next week) but it feels a good 60-100hp faster with my hyper accurate butt-o-meter. I guess I will find out.

Also, I have a friend who is made 480rwhp with one of those ebay special "Super T70" crappy turbos (although it did last 3 years on 2 different cars before it finaly walked the exhaust wheel into the housing). He also has a completly stock long block, but he has a custom intake manifold made with RB25 runners and a RB26 surge tank, and a Q45 TB. He also beats the snot out of his car and shifts around 8k. I've got money on his blowing up soon, but that's more because of how he treats it. I shift around 7.5k and don't bounce it off the rev limiter doing donuts and burnouts like him. Fun to watch though :D I think we are a little more daring with our cars when a stock long block is $300 USD from any junk yard around here (Okinawa).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...