Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Item: 2 garrett 2871R-10's Basicly these are HKS GTR-S' Garrett specs can be found on their web site.

They are up for sale as im now going larger since the engine is run in and ready to go.

Age: They have done 1000Km's on my Brand new engine to run it in, Have been stripped, cleaned and Are basicly in Brand new condition.

To Fit: They are a BOLT on upgrade for the RB26. Ill supply the relevant drain fittings for them as well

Location: Located in sydney but prepared to work out shipping costs with buyer

Contact: Via PM, or in here.

Price I want $2500 neg. They are significantly more new and these are basicly brand new turbos so your saving a lot of money with them.

These were sold last week however looks like the buys have fallen through so back up for sale.

turbos2.jpg

turbos1.jpg

Garretts.jpg

CHRAnumbers.jpg

turbo.jpg

exhausthousing2.jpg

Exhausthousing.jpg

Picture082.jpg

Edited by Risking
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/194675-gtr-bolt-on-turbos/
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Does that price include the rack time to straighten the frame and body and replacement of parts and paint, as well as the noise and emmisions testing  The last engineering certificate I had done, albeit about 15 years ago, was around $1000 for a few inspections and the certificate 
    • 😂 thanks guys. The diagram i had did not have the breather on it at all. Much appreciated.  
    • Geez, engineers fees have definitely gone up. Mine back 2007 cost me all of $300. Mind you, I had to go back to him a few times to get him to write the correct things on the report after he'd inspected it. Things like wrong exhaust size, wrong wheel sizes, etc etc.
    • Can we see a scan of the original quote? The problem with engineers (and by this, I mean, all engineers across all engineering industries) is that there are "engineers" and there are "engineers" (you'll have to imagine the two different vocal emphases on those two versions of the same word. Engineering is a mindset - your farm kid who spent his life rebuilding the tractor will likely make a good engineer. The farm kid who spent his life taking photos of butterflies.. perhaps not. But on top of that mindset, the modern engineer has to learn how to write so that there is absolutely no way of being misunderstood. Proposals/budget estimates/quotations are one place where this is absolutely vital. You have to delineate your scope of supply with extremely hard boundaries, and anywhere where there is any possibility of not being able to have such a hard boundary, you need to write language that will cover you from scope creep, cost overruns, the inevitable interference of the client or their "engineer", etc etc. Now, if your clients are the BHPs and the Rio Tintos of the world, and similar, then you get good at this. If you are an automotive engineer, pitching work to the great unwashed masses, your skills in this area might not be well developed, because you're only dealing with knuckle draggers trying to get a big block legal in a Torana. And when I say "might not"....I'd suggest there's a better than even chance that any such skills might be completely absent. So, we might be able to look at your quote and see what the opportunities are for rebuttal.
×
×
  • Create New...