Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 153
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Wow I can't believe your putting NOS in. I doubt it will make 200kw...well not at the wheels anyway.

The bad thing about some NOS systems is they're not progressive and come on too strongly, 75hp sounds alright.

If you insist on staying N/A and not going FI, bang for your buck - cams and power fc ... it would make the engine much more elastic in the rev range, might lose a bit of bottom end depending on what cams you going.

Little concerned about the placment of the NOS jet Cara, being in only one side of the two intakes you may not get an even distribution to all cylinders. As a general rule of thumb they should always be at least 6 to 8 inches before the throttle body for an even distribution to all cylinders.

I was at High tech dyno today fiddling with the fueling on the dyno as my tune was alittle too rich, just on idle chatter about various cars with one of the tuners, your atmo Nitrous+PFC subject came up and coincidentally I see the topic here today.

Very interesting to say the least, good luck with everything :)

true but go race a turbod car. :)

See how it goes.

why? i don't like the smug tone of your post.

race your car against an F430, see how it goes.

this is the naturally aspirated section and more specifically cara's thread about her nitrous progress... please keep it on topic.

why? i don't like the smug tone of your post.

race your car against an F430, see how it goes.

this is the naturally aspirated section and more specifically cara's thread about her nitrous progress... please keep it on topic.

You got the wrong tone.

I'm pretty sure i read clearly that this is the NA section also, what this thread is on.

I'd be more than happy to go up against a F430. Wouldn't you want to try?

Have i said something off topic? I was just saying to take it against a turbod car and see how the nos goes.

I wasn't saying, that this idea was stupid and that putting it up against a turbo it still would have no chance.

Geez.

if that's the case then i take back my comment and offer my apologies.

very often we get people in here who preach 'turbo'. reading your post in different light, i agree - that would be a test to try out. however where do you draw the line in terms of comparison? same power output or same amout of money spent?

with what you said, going head to head with a mild GTSt/GTT would be evenly matched - driver pending.

CARA!

YOU SAID YOU WONT BE STINGY ON THE PICS!

:nyaanyaa:

Hows she go?

agree with john. i think 3 & 4 would get a larger amount of nitrous than the others.

direct port injection :w00t:

I dont think so.. The pistons cause vacume and hence suction at different times.. the valves will be open to allow the piston to create suction and taking in the bulk of the NOS. Because not all 6 cyl's are creating suction at the same time ther isnt much "comptetiton" from others. Residue may be left near cylinders 3 and 4. But they wont be getting significantly more NOS than the others..

Not sure if this makes sence.. cos I have a feeling it dosnt..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • What are your plans for your blow off valves? Purely plumb back? How soft will the spring in them be? AFM can be tricky to get super smooth and nice, especially depending on the rest of the system, and then can be very easily upset if something slightly changes. IE, even if you run recirc blow off valves, you could still see issues getting it to behave at certain load points as turbos might start to spool, but you release the throttle but it's not enough pressure to crack the bov open to recirc, and you can end up with reversion which can cause double metering, and hence dumping of fuel into the system, and stalling the engine.   If you're going to run a map sensor for closed loop boost control from the ECU, what makes you want to keep the AFM?    
    • It's not bad, it's just not flexible. And say if you have any leaks between the MAF and plenum, well then your load axis goes out the window. Here's a real world scenario, I blew off an intercooler hose last track day, as the clamp decided to Bluetooth itself somewhere. Still continued to do 2 laps and drive it to the pub for a couple of beers then home. Good luck doing that with a MAF setup 
    • Is MAF load really that bad? I'm not trying to do big power, my only real desire is VCAM and flex fuel support so I'm not terrified of blowing my engine apart from CA's appalling 95 RON "premium" fuel. Stuff like playing with closed loop boost control and really dialing in my transient fueling and ignition are frankly just to prove to myself I remembered something from uni.
    • Thats what ive been doing. Ive got a million questions but i know theyve probably all been answered before at some stage. Todays research included nismo heritage seat covers, s3 projector headlight retrofits and how to remove/paint the rocker covers 
×
×
  • Create New...