Jump to content
SAU Community

RB20DETT TwinTurbo2Litre


Recommended Posts

Hi guys, After blowing a turbo gasket, I’m in the process of fitting 2 stock RB20 turbos to my Nissan Syline R32 GTSt. All the work is been done at a engineering firm in Bunbury WA where my dad works.

We are making 2 separate manifolds one for each turbo. Front 3 exhaust outlets to one and the back 3 to the other turbo. There is going to be a balance pipe that goes between both manifolds to equalise pressure into both turbos. We see there is no need to have 2 wastegates so one will be blocked off. All water and oil lines are been ‘T’ . There will be 3” pipes coming off the back of the turbos converging into a 4” exhaust system. Air intake for the turbos will consist on the 1 pod filter, splitting into 2 pipes after the afm then to the turbos. The outlets for the turbos will converge into one tube entering the front mount intercooler then engine.

This project is well underway, and if all goes well will be completed in a month. Before starting this project I had 200bhp running a stock turbo with 13psi, with the intercooler and a 3” exhaust. I have had it down the drag strip with a time of 13.7 @ 167km/h.

I was interested if any one had any comments on how laggy it will be, the power output I might achieve, or any concerns about what im doing. All comments will be appreciated. thanks, Ewan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 141
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

the stock RB20 turbos are a tad larger than the factory gtr ones and will come on boost and make full boost at approximately a tad over double the rpm they would as a single (probably add another 500rpm or so).

So thats about 5500-6000rpm?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did some reading on twin turbo setups. Where twins will help, if run in parrallel, not talking about sequential, is if you are aiming for xxx amount of flow (power), rather than fitting one large turbo, two smaller ones with a combined flowequal to the flow of the larger one will spool up quicker - that is if the turbine wheels are half the size etc. Its not exact in the real world, because of so many other variables, anyway starting to digress....

This has to do with the energy required to move the wheel varying exponentially, rather than linearly, as the radius increases - so two smaller wheels (turbine) require less energy to spin at the same speed as one larger wheel.

So, where the advantage will lie, is if you were wanting to fit, for exampe, one 500 hp turbo, two 250hp turbos of half the size exactly, will come on boost quicker than the one bigger turbo.

Perhaps it would be worth seeing if you cannot find a couple of smaller turbos to fit?, second hand GTR ones or even smaller if possible? This would give you boost alot quicker. Remeber that while the rb20 turbo isnt huge, it is designed for a 2L engine, so if you put 2 of them on, you probably have a car that would be good for the drags, not so much of a streeter.

For wastegate, perhaps it would be possible to run one wastegate on the crossover pipe between the manifolds? but probably alot better to just use the stadard wastegate on the turbos - these could be controlled by one boost controller, with the line t-ed no probs.

As rev suggested, exhaust cam, also a good manifold design, decent dump pipes, good exhaust, 'high' flow cat etc will all make boost earlier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw the other thread on the same topic first, but rev210 is exactly right. Each turbo will have to spin up to the original shaft RPM to generate the original boost, but with only half the exhaust volume to do it. As a result boost threshold RPM will double, and rate of boost rise will be just about half.

It will be pretty awsome at the very top end though. Some smaller a/r exhaust housings would be what I would be looking for, or a couple of stock GTR turbos at a friendly price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Further to Steve's comments on large single versus twins has to do with the relative needs of airflow and boost pressure for various engines.

If you look at any flow map it leans to the right, with the most efficient operating islands in the middle somewhere. Now this means a given sized turbo will give you more available flow as the pressure increases, and you operate higher on the flow-map.

It also means that at low boost levels, there will be a far lower efficient flow available.

Now suppose you have a fairly large capacity engine and you only want to run low boost. You could either fit a huge single, or two smaller turbos, each supplying only half the flow.

Ford on the XR6 have gone the huge single way with a monstrous GT40 turbo, which everyone thinks is oversized, but almost certainly is not. Or Nissan with the GTR have two very small turbos to do much the same thing. In each case there is pretty high airflow requirement at fairly low stock type boost levels.

On the other hand if you have a small capacity engine and you want to run very high boost, a large single is going to be better because it will fit better onto the flow-map. High flow and high boost go well together with a large single.

So as Steve says, if you want 500 BHP it really depends on the boost level you need to make that power. If it is going on an eight litre monster that only needs 4psi boost, go multiple turbos.

If its a one litre engine running 50 psi boost or something, a single will get it done best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AFM will be dependant on how much air flow, ie, how much power you are making - no point forking out dollars if you havent had the car on a dyno. Lots of other things to consider, like fuel system, clutch, ECU, gearbox (perhaps) etc - more important than doing an AFM straight up.

What other mods do you have already?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

R32 GTSTT, what sort of power are you looking for? RB20/25 afm's are good for ~370bhp (thats at the engine). If you want any more, you'll need a Z32 or better afm. Whats your power goal? Chasing power without setting a power goal is always going to end in disaster.

A twin turbo RB20 is a different way to go about things and I like it. Twin RB20 turbos is the wrong choice though. Look for twin RB26DETT turbs (T28 flange) or twin VG30DETT turbs (T25 flange), they'll be a better match.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by broken

i would get a aftermarket computer and ditch the airflow meter completely for a map sensor.

Why? A 80mm pipe with filament running down the centre isn't going to be a physical restriction, and afm's are much better at measuring engine load than map sensors. Work with the ecu you've got R32 GTSTT. Its more than capable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Latest Posts

    • I am currently going this route. I am curious how much horse power you put behind the cut bell housing? Collins was telling me I am going to crack it and bluh bluh bluh. Because I didn’t buy the custom fly wheel from him. I am looking for somewhere around like 500 hp
    • Forgot to mention that these are the before pics when I first got it!
    • Thanks @PranK for the updated member status, much appreciated! 👍🏼 Now, about those pics… Unfortunately I could only find ones that I took in the dark. I was soon to discover that underneath it wasn’t in the best shape, but it was mine and that’s all I cared about at the time 😆
    • Oh, and only having done this task yesterday, I've now driven the car ~60km since, and while it is hard to avoid placebo effect and confirmation bias, I reckon that some annoyances I had with the way the car has been behaving have improved. Which....kinda makes sense, I guess. If the bushes were really stiff and resisting rotation, they would have been contributing to the effective wheel rate. And if it was more so on one side (which it was, because one side was worse than the other) then.... you might imagine that the additional rate would be asymmetric, and potentially even different between compression and rebound. And so... the car has been twitchy at higher speeds - like freeway on ramps. It really shouldn't be. The wheel alignment is good and there are no (other) known problems elsewhere in the suspension. But at 90-100 on a long sweeping ramp, tiny steering wheel motions would make it feel like it wanted to rear steer. Quite nervous. At lower speeds it would heave about in a manner that it didn't use to. Didn't want to put power down, etc etc. Now...seems to behave better. Am going to have to concentrate on the various corners where it has exhibited weirdness, on the rare occasions when I can get a decent run at them without Methanial getting in the way in his D-Max/Ranger/LDV Van/etc.
×
×
  • Create New...