Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys, this is probably the billionth post like this...but i got this turbo, its only done a 1000km. I plan on bolting it to my rb25det in the meantime before the whole gt35r thing....

i need someone to tell me whats the deal with this turbo, good or bad, responsive or not...

all the info i have is its an rb25 rear housing with a machined wheel, a/r60 front cover t04???

part number on the core is 446179-5032 it says garrett.

here's a few pics.

thanks guys, appreciated..

also, if you guys did need wheel sizes etc...whats the deal? just get some verniers onto em?

post-23597-1196672463_thumb.jpg

post-23597-1196672492_thumb.jpg

Edited by Ryanrb25
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/196170-what-is-this-turbo/
Share on other sites

part number on the core is 446179-5032 it says garrett.
Seems to be the 56T GT2871R. Should be pretty responsive!

Yes, that CHRA number = 56T GT2871 cartridge. With the larger (compared to 48T version) inducer size on the compressor, it should provide a responsive 240kW (maybe a bit more) on an RB25. Compared to the 48T version, it won't offer quite the same transient response (ie very close to stock-feel) but pretty good.

Any idea why your mate pulled it off the RB20, and/or what it drove like with that turbo fitted?

hey mate

I've just had a look at this turbo on my Garrett Master spreadsheet, and it appears as Simon-R32 said - a 56 trim GT2871. I know that the 48trim version makes 220rwkw at 15psi, just send a PM to Dale_FZ1 as he has one and has done extensive testing. I will certainly point him at this thread, as he'll be very interested to see your results.

I've driven his car and it makes a full 15psi by 2800rpm on the RB25. Very responsive.

This would probably make full boost by 3,000rpm (a little later due to the more agressive 56trim) and yeah, I estimate would make about 240rwkw and *maybe* 250rwkw if you squeeze her a little more. Depends on the exhaust housing though, as they are restrictive as hell and the RB25 housing on my GT3076 only managed 240rwkw due to it being too small.

But this is definately a f**ken fantastic upgrade for a RB25.

Edited by The Mafia

ah great news guys, cheers for your input, i got the turbo real cheap, its only done a 1000km so its still fresh..the pictures are bad i know but that actual rear wheel is as large as you can fit in that housing by the looks of how much its machined out...

my mate removed it off his rb20 due to the rings on number one going, he's currently forgie rebuilding it and wackin on a gt3540 off xr6t, not sure the rear they run i think .82 or something....but yea thats a different sorry.

The turbo on the 20 was a little laggy (rb20 nature anyway) came on strong at about 3700.

im about a week or so away from eventually fitting the gear so will have results soon for you guys.

anyone know if this core needs different fittings for oil, coolant etc..or will the standard rb25 lines suit? or is it just a matter of buying lines to suit gt2871r cores?

cheers for the info guys, really helpful, keep ya posted with results

  • 3 weeks later...

guys, wacked on this turbo over the weekend, running 7psi through stock tune with Power FC and already am i amazed at the responce, pickup and kick of torque.....such a smooth torque band even without a tune and on 7psi....Putting injectors, z32, fuelpump in very soon, will keep you posted.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey, it's a GT-R, it's just as significant a moment as mine😁 It's not ideal when things are uncertain; I'm the type of person that always has a set plan for things in life so being unsure of this plan puts me in a weird place mentally.
    • Hows your intake piping? Are you still running stock? Having in the stock AFM position would mean, if the BOV was shut/venting out, it'd create the almost stalling kind of effect right // "the rich pulse behaviour" due to MAF thinking air is flowing ? But this would be better than having the bov in the stock position + MAF on/just before cross over piping right?
    • Essentially, yes. Although I wouldn't put the AFM on the crossover pipe. I'd want to put it into what amounts to the correct size tube, which is more easily done in the intercooler pipework. I bought a mount tube for card style AFM that replaces the stock AFM - although being a cheap AliExpress knockoff, it had no flange and I had to make and weld my own. But it is the same length and diameter as the stock RB AFM, goes on my airbox, etc etc. I don't have a sick enough rig to warrant anything different, and the swap will take 5 minutes (when I finally get around to it and the injectors & the dyno tune).
    • So to summarise, the best thing to do is to move recirc to between turbo and IC, and maf on the crossover pipe. Meaning I'd need a recirc flange, drill a hole in the piping on turbo outlet area. And drill hole on crossover to fit/weld maf sensor? Either that or put the MAF on the turbo inlet right?  Is an aftermarket recirc/blowoff valve recommended? Do currently have family in Japan so could probably bring something back with maybe a cheeky lil SuperAutobacs run?
    • Yep, so far most have said that it looks like corrosion on the wall from piston not moving. Which then has probably damaged the oil rings and caused those vertical marks. The longest the engine was still after the rebuild, was the winter of 2018 - 2019, plus the boat trip to Japan. When I shipped the car, it had normal gas in the tank but before that winter pause, it had E85 in tank.  In any case, even if either one of those was the cause, it happened close to 6 years ago and the car has been driven something like 30 000kms after the fact. Again, apart from the plugs and the dip stick, there is nothing in the way the car runs that would indicate what has been going on in the engine. I am going to consult a shop and ask their opinion, what would be the best approach. I do have some access to a garage I could use to diagnose further myself, but time is very restrictive. Might end up buying another engine that could be used while this one is being remedied. Without pulling the head, it will be impossible to find out if it needs another bore, but here's to hoping a hone would suffice.  Goddamnit, I would really have preferred this not happening.  
×
×
  • Create New...