Jump to content
SAU Community

Ps3 Or Xbox


Abo Bob
 Share

PS3 or XBox  

95 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Last day off for me :P... Back to work tomorrow. Oh well.

GT5 looks awesome. I think I'd buy the ps3 for that alone.

xbox360 has a lot of cool games apparently.

Oh, and you can't get the 60GB ps3 anymore (which could play ps2 games). You can only get the 40GB which isn't backwards compatible.

Gran Turismo 5 wont be coming out on Xbox so that decided it for me..

Xbox has more games, but seriously, how many games are you actually gonna buy at $80-$100 per game?? :P

The only shit thing about the current PS3 is that it isnt backward compatible... but if you've got PS2 games then you should have a PS2 to play them on anyway i guess.

IMO Blueray is going to win the 'war', so PS3 with the Blueray player was my choice.

Neither can be chipped yet (that I know of).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ps3 for me im not a fanboy of either machine as I own a Wii as well. But the people that say 360 has more games than ps3 have a look at how long its been out for... of course it should have alot more games. Both a pretty even with the 360 being easy to program for but I guess things will change when developers know how to exploit the PS3's capabilities.

Blu ray format is another positive not just for movies but allows alot more storage space for games compared to the DVD-9 format on 360. It depends really on what games you like. All of my favorite games are sony exclusives so that sealed the deal for me plus I got a blu ray player out of it as well.

FYI I have a 60gb version so backward compatiblilty isnt a problem for me.

When I was going to buy the Wii I tossed up on if I should get a 360 instead but the fact (at the time) they had problems with reliabilty decided to steer me clear of the 360.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm planing to buy a PS3. Simply becos of final fantasy and tekken games will come out! Also u can buy Midnight maximum tune on the Ps3...if you like playing the arcade version. Ps3 is more sexy looking!! 360 is basically a PC!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PS3's online is free to play games.. to most degrees. you still pay a fee to buy stuff if you want.. eg big cheat 'patches' etc.

you have to pay on 360 to play games online at all.

big plus for ps3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

360 makes way too much noise as it constantly keeps the disc spining at flat out speeds. Sounds like a shitty CDROM in a PC at 50x. Took it back the next day...

Got the PS3 now, whisper quiet and ive gotta say, the controllers are much better.... That fact that ive had PS and PS2 prevously might have something to do with that :woot:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally have the 360 and i love it. The controllers are much better to use, there are a lot more games available, and there IS a chip for the xbox. Well, not really a chip but they "flash" the DVD drive. I don't know exactly what it does, but you play copied games because of that. I've had it for about a year, got about 10 games (all copied) and i wont buy a single original games. I buy each game for about $8, whereas you can get a PS3 and buy each game for $100+.

The Blu-Ray thing doesn't bother me. When the time comes, i'll get a Blu-Ray player - not a PS3. Anyone with a PS1 or PS2 knows that the laser eventually F's itself and thats it for the system - it's as good as the dirt on your front lawn. Sony focuses too much on TV's/Sterio's/Car Audio/Computer bits/Mobile Phones/then the PS3. The market for Sony is too big, they really don't care about the quality of their "other" products.

The only downside with the Xbox 360 is the Xbox live. You have to buy an external wireless adaptor so you can play against other people on the net. Other then that, the Xbox is made to perfection!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being a fanboy of the Xbox, people would assume i would choose that. I own both systems but have more games on the 360.

In this generation, I would have to opt for the ps3. At the current time, the 360 has alooooooot more games and more people have a 360 (probably because of price). The 360 had alot of downsides when it came out. For one, it is noisy. Too noisy lol. Second, to have a decent long session of gaming you should probably buy an intercooler for the 360 as it overheats really easily.

The ps3 can overheat also, but only if you have it stored in the inside of a cupboard. The ps3 is basically future proof. It has a Blu-ray and given a few years, will easily have better graphics then the 360. At the moment developers are just finding it hard to produce a game onto the blu-ray format. That's why most multi-platform games are first made for the 360, then ported over to the ps3. The ps3 given a year or so, will have a very good lineup of games, and the graphics will improve dramitcally.

This battle is basically like the last-gen battle but in reverse. Sony had a headstart on Microsoft, and therefore had a major part of the sales due to the amount of consoles sold. The xbox however, was more powerful then the ps2 and could run more powerful games. I believe that this is the opposite case now, xbox had a start and the ps3 is more powerful and future-proof.

So i would say a ps3. Personal oppinion, remembering im a xbox fanboy. :nyaanyaa:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I plan on getting a PS3, no real reason for it, just want to...

I don't have a super mega awesome TV as of yet, so the fact that it is blue ray really doesn't mean shit to me, I can't even make DVDs look any better then tapes...

But I love my 360... Maybe I'm just used to loud shit, but it isn't that noisy, mine has NEVER over heated (and man I have played the SHIT out of it before... left it in for days on some long Forza 2 races) and never skipped a beat... and i treat the thing damn rough too...

First Xbox I have ever had too, had both the PSX and the PS2 before the Xbox (both were fantastic, PS2 was our first DVD player... LOVED IT!) I might look into chipping the xbox...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hard to say.If Sony still had the 60gig version with the SD card reader id say get the playstation.

So 50/50.

My brother has a 360 and i have played the ps3 they both look the same graphics wise but the 360 has all the numbers when it comes to games.

Some people buy the playstation for the fact its both a gaming console and a Blue Ray player.

So if your presentee is keen on Dvds and has a decent LCD or plasma go the ps3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PS3 hands down...

it is backward compatible with some games...not a lot though, mainly more recent titles..

Graphics are superior, just depends on the game as some dont show as much as others...

I worked for Krome Studios...dnt know if anyone knows of them, but it was pretty much PS3 for the win, i worked on 'Hellboy: The science of evil' which was on both 360 and PS3 and the PS3 did show clearer crisper graphics.

360 controllers are a cheap rip on Playstation controllers IN MY OPINION...

not to mention the PS3 controls are much lighter (obviously because they removed the vibration function), which is awesome, and they also have the six-axis function, which isnt that much of a major feature but is kind of cool (im sure it could come in handy for those who like to tilt to the side when playing racing games etc...)

as was covered 360 has more next gen titles, but a lot of the best games are PS3 only...well my favs ie...Final Fantasy, Metal Gear Solid 4, GT 5... the list goes on

360 is a good console none the less, but i think the main reason a lot of people (and this is going back a fair while) chose 360 over PS3 had to do with the fact that sony kept pushing back the date, which as im sure evry1 will agree was freakin annoying... and im sure this cost them a lot of support as the hype died due to the constant promise that it would be out and then knocking it back again...

any how thas my 2 cents...(more like $20) :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Latest Posts

    • As someone who has been playing with turbo things for some time now, be prepared for this to not be the first time feeling this way    I'm busy as atm, but if no one else covers the things I'm realising are worth mentioning to you then I will when I have a chance as it seems like I overestimated your knowledge on how turbos and wastegates work.  Otherwise I recommend having a look around how wastegates and boost control work, really anything on understanding the general mechanism of boost control as it will help you find the answers to the questions you're looking for.  Your initial question jumps some fundamentals.
    • I don't understand anything anymore.
    • so this is an anomaly??? I thought it was a voluntary increase
    • we can only guess exactly what happened from our keyboards, but to me it looks like they were targeting 27 but the wastegate was too small or poorly controlled and the boost crept up, that is quite common
    • Good points!  Took those for granted - though I *did* actually give an example of winding boost up more than it had been before where I wasn't actually specifically looking for more peak power.  The Toyota Starlet dyno plot that I shared and mentioned showed an overlay from the previous tune it had and the one I'd redone, I left the boost targetting the same as the old tune but then after peak power I ramped boost up by a good 5psi or so over what the old tune had at the same rpm. The reason I felt comfortable with this (though the owner of the car had a "are you sure?" moment when I suggested it) is that the setup wasn't turbo limited, it was largely head sealing limited and the owner was a bit concerned as for the last few seasons he'd had issues with head lifting - sometimes not completing an event without having some headgasket issue, so he didn't want to run any more boost than it was. The reasons I was ok with raising the boost a good 5+psi MORE than that was that I left it where it was in the middle, and only increased it where VE (and therefore cylinder pressure vs psi) were dropping hard and I didn't stop the torque from dropping, just reduced the drop.  Well, there is that and the fact that the previous tuner had it overtimed by near 7degrees at peak torque - but that's another story haha.    I didn't really go into detail about that "turning it up more" thing but now you've mentioned the "not detuning", sometimes the boost *can* be turned up higher than you'd expect if the setup allows for it and you do it smartly.  I've tuned things to run 30psi on BP98 "safely" that a few years ago (or still?) people would cry that it was a stupid idea - but given they were well intercooled, low EMAP turbos and only doing that kind of boost where VE is dropping etc I was pretty confident it wasn't as cowboy as it sounded at face value and we never ended up with issues as a result of it.     
×
×
  • Create New...